Thursday, April 29, 2010

John Kozy: Western Civilization is Doomed

From: Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 Subject: John Kozy: Western Civilization is Doomed
All good but if you don't have time just short version will do (last paragraph)...KD


The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty: Last Gasp of a Moribund Civilization
By Prof. John Kozy


Global Research, April 27, 2010


"Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can only be attained through understanding." Ralph Waldo Emerson
When I was a boy, I knew a man who repaired clocks and watches as a hobby. (Quartz watches had not yet been invented.) I often sat for hours in utter fascination watching him work. Then one day, I asked, "Frank, how do you know how to do that?" He answered, "Johnny, what man has done, man can do." Therein lies the fallacy of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Science and technology is a Pandora's Box. Once opened by one man, company, or country, what is emitted soon becomes everyone's.

The United States made the first atomic bomb in 1945. The first attempt at non-proliferation was limited to trying to keep the knowledge of how to build the bomb secret. It failed, and within a decade, the USSR (1949), the UK (1952), France (1960), and China (1964) had built bombs. Since then India (1974), Israel (1979), Pakistan (1998), and North Korea (2006) have become nuclear powers, and South Africa has the capability, having produced six nuclear weapons in the 1980s but later disassembled them. Now the know-how is widespread.

Only two nations benefited from World War II: Russia and America. The other nations that made up what is called Western Civilization had become American vassal states; they could no longer act alone. Their national policies become subject to American approval, and when America calls, they, if reluctantly, become part of some coalition that America decides to build. At the end of World War II, America had become the predominant Western power. But being the predominant Western power did not mean it had become the predominant power, and the non-western world soon realized it even although Americans assumed it had.

The United Nations was ostensibly established:  


* to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and
* to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and
* to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and
* to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
AND FOR THESE ENDS
* to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours, and
* to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and
* to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and
* to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples. . . .

Obviously, it has failed. But although those words come from the Charter, they were and are sheer propaganda. The organization was formed by World War II's victorious powers in an attempt to control the world. The Security Council was established in a way that gave those nations absolute control over the organization. Each of the five permanent members of the Council can veto any resolution it disapproves of.

The five permanent members are China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States—all nuclear powers. Originally they were Nationalist China, France, the USSR, the UK, and the USA—the countries that made up the allied coalition that defeated the axis in World War II. But most of these nations were no longer really great powers. France and the UK had become vassal states of the USA. Nationalist China had been reduced to an island; the real China was Communist and occupied the mainland. The USSR was a Communist world power, that has now been superceded by the Russian Federation. The cooperation that the United States expected from the other members of the Security Council dissipated.

When North Korea invaded the South in an attempt to unify the nation which had been bifurcated for political reasons at the end of World War II, the UN Security Council, at the request of the US and minus the absent Soviet delegate, passed a resolution calling for the assistance of all UN members in halting the North Koreans. The UN coalition consisted of sixteen mostly Western nations: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Ethiopia, France, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, the UK, and the USA. Although never totally defeated, the coalition managed only to preserve the status quo that preceded the invasion. But the war demonstrated that the Western powers that were victorious in World War II were not invincible, and the French and American debacles in Viet Nam confirmed this vincibility.

The Persian Gulf War (Desert Storm) was again initiated with United Nations authorization by a coalition force from 34 nations to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait after it was invaded. (Twenty-six nations contributed personnel, many in non-combative roles: the USA, Afghanistan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, the UK, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Egypt, France, Germany, Honduras, Italy, Kuwait, New Zealand, Niger, Oman, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, and South Korea. More than sixty percent of the personnel came from the USA. Although totally victorious over Iraq's conventional army, for political reasons, the war again merely reestablished the status quo. (In this conflict, South Korea, whose existence was preserved by a similar war fought by a similar coalition, contributed merely one medical battalion. Interesting! Was this really a coalition of the "willing"?)

Since then, US forces have been driven out of Lebanon (1983) and Somalia (1993) and have been bogged down along with other coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan for more than eight years. What has become obvious to the rest of the world, and perhaps even American diplomats, is that the armed forces of Western coalitions and other coalition partners are not invincible. Western Civilization can no longer advance its goals using conventional military means. But the major Western nations are still members of the nuclear club. The last option these nations have of maintaining their control is keeping the nuclear club limited to Western nations as far as possible by means of the NPT and using their nuclear power as a threat.

But American policies alone have made this impossible; it shared its atomic weapons with NATO allies; Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey store and can deploy atomic bombs. Now although some of these countries have asked the US to remove these weapons, the US refuses to. And although the US hopes to force North Korea to relinquish its weapons and to keep Iran from acquiring them, Americans say nothing about Israeli, Indian, and Pakistani nuclear capabilities. The result, of course, is an argument for the NPT that is seen as disingenuous; it carries no conviction, and American and Western influence on the world wanes.

The North Koreans and Iranians are not moved by American protestations. Israel routinely rejects American policy initiatives. The Russians and the Chinese are, at best, lukewarm about sanctioning Iran, and the Chinese openly laugh at American diplomats who speak in China. Even the peoples of many Western nations deride American policy initiatives. America has lost its preeminent position. It has now become a vassal state of its own making. Everything it wants to do requires the cooperation of its coalitions, and even when it gets it, the initiatives often fail.
Can the expansion and enforcement of the NPT succeed? Doubtful! The knowledge of how to build atomic weapons is widespread; it can no longer be contained. So the policy now is to maintain control of the fissionable material needed to make the bombs. But that has little chance of succeeding. Western policies are too contradictory. As Emerson so aptly put it, "What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say."

The United States with all of its policing powers has demonstrated that even it cannot stop the smuggling of contraband into its own land. The nations from which the contraband comes can not stop it, even with American help. How can the US expect other nations to stop it? In many parts of the world, especially the non-Western parts, smuggling has been carried on for centuries. Even Western businesses are often complicit is defying American export controls and sanctions. The initiative is a fool's errand, the last gasp of a moribund civilization. The only hope of avoiding a future nuclear war is the total abolition of nuclear weapons. But once the nations that comprise the Western world do that, their worldly control vanishes.

No civilization in history that collapsed after a period of greatness has ever regained its dominance. Egypt lasted for three millennia; today it is little more than a field for archeological study. The Persian Empire, which lasted for more than three hundred years, became the largest and most powerful empire of its time; today, all that remains is Iran. Greece has never recovered from its collapse after its Golden Age, and the greatness of Rome has been reduced to Italy. When Mussolini tried to revive Roman greatness, he failed miserably. The Spanish, Dutch, French, and English empires have expired and these nations are now mere vassals states, although France and England still pretend to be world powers. Lasting greatness is not attained by the imposition of power. As with all the great civilizations of the past, Western Civilization is doomed as long as it continues to pursue this method of dominance. The NPT won't save it.

John Kozy is a retired professor of philosophy and logic who blogs on social, political, and economic issues. After serving in the U.S. Army during the Korean War, he spent 20 years as a university professor and another 20 years working as a writer. He has published a textbook in formal logic commercially, in academic journals and a small number of commercial magazines, and has written a number of guest editorials for newspapers. His on-line pieces can be found on http://www.jkozy.com/ and he can be emailed from that site's homepage.

Please support Global Research - Global Research relies on the financial support of its readers.
 Your endorsement is greatly appreciated


Subscribe to the Global Research e-newsletter



Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained iPublish Postn this article.

To become a Member of Global Research


The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com


www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries:
crgeditor@yahoo.com © Copyright John Kozy, Global Research, 2010
The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=18889

© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007


The Reverend James Manning, PhD - 2012 Elect: Boots On The Ground

From: ATLAH Ministries  Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 Subject: 2012 Elect: Boots On The Ground

I remember the awful feeling of disgust and contempt on the election night of 4th Nov. 2008.

"How could America go so wrong, why," was my faint response.
Obama sits in the Whitehouse confident that nobody in America will call him the criminal and usurper he is.
I have called for a trial under the power of 10th amendment of the U.S. Constitution to present in a legal forum the overwhelming evidence of his crimes and guilt.
In tandem with the trial, I have called for a seven day march around Columbia University right here in Harlem.
I have found the open door to unseal all his sealed records, that door is Columbia University.
I have need of only one thing; that you make the sacrifice to be here on 14th of May for the start of the march and the fall of the gavel.
We need each others strength. I am your brother, stand with me in this most historical and critical hour.
Do not desert America at this revolutionary hour.
Log onto Atlah.org for trial and Columbia march updates .

In The Service Of America, A Natural Born Citizen, Rev. James David Manning, PhD
 
If you would like to contact us please email enewsletter@atlah.org. Call us toll free at 1-877-777-0734. Visit our website: atlah.org. Or you can mail us at ATLAH Ministries, 38 West 123rd Street, ATLAH, New York 10027. © 2010 ATLAH Ministries. All Rights Reserved.  ATLAH Ministries, Inc., 38 West 123rd Street ATLAH, NY 10027, Attn: IT Department


Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Life & Death - Surviving Abortion: Tough little guy, entered the world at the wrong time, he had no choice...KD (REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER)

From: kd Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 Subject: Surviving Abortion

     Tough little guy, entered the world at the wrong time, he had no choice...KD
"A baby boy abandoned by doctors to die after a botched abortion was found alive nearly a day later."
By Simon Caldwell - Published: 4:29PM BST 28 Apr 2010
The 22-week infant died one day later in intensive care at a hospital in the mother's home town of Rossano in southern Italy.

The mother, pregnant for the first time, had opted for an abortion after prenatal scans suggested that her baby was disabled.

However, the infant survived the procedure, carried out on Saturday in the Rossano Calabro hospital, and was left by doctors to die.

He was discovered alive the following day – some 20 hours after the operation – by Father Antonio Martello, the hospital chaplain, who had gone to pray beside his body.

He found that the baby, wrapped in a sheet with his umbilical cord still attached, was moving and breathing.
The priest raised the alarm and doctors immediately arranged for the infant to be taken to a specialist neo-natal unit at the neighbouring Cosenza hospital, where he died on Monday morning.

Italian police are investigating the case for "homicide" because infanticide is illegal in Italy.  The law means that doctors have had an obligation to try to preserve the life of the child once he had survived the abortion.

The Italian government is also considering an inquiry into the conduct of the hospital staff.

Eugenia Roccella, the under-secretary of state in the health department, on Wednesday night promised a government inquiry into the incident.  "The minister of health will send inspectors to the hospital in Rossano Calabro to investigate what actually happened, and to see if the Law 194, which prohibits abortion when there is a possibility of the foetus living separately from the mother, and permits it only when the continuation of the pregnancy would result in life-threatening danger to the mother."  She said that if initial information is correct, "this would be a case of deliberate abandonment of a seriously premature neonate, possibly also with some form of disability, an act contrary to any sense of human compassion but also of any accepted professional medical practice".  She added: "We must remember that a baby, once born, is an Italian citizen equal to all the others, and is entitled to all fundamental rights, including the right to health and therefore to be given full support."

The case has reignited controversy on the legality of abortion in the Roman Catholic country.

It could also raise questions in Britain over the legal upper limits for abortion and the viability of the foetus – or its ability to survive outside of the womb.

A spokesman for the ProLife Alliance said: "There cannot be anybody in the world who is not horrified by a story like this nor anybody in the UK who would not support a massive reduction in the upper limit for abortion."

Most abortions at 22 weeks simply involve the induction of the birth which normally results in the death of a young foetus.

The case is causing uproar in Italy because it is the second involving a foetus of that age surviving the procedure in just three years.  The other involved a baby in Florence who weighed just 17oz when he was aborted at 22 weeks because of a suspected genetic disorder, but lived for three days.

Since 1978, abortion has been available on demand in Italy in the first three months of pregnancy but is restricted to specific circumstances – such as disability- in the second trimester. The government is considering a review of the working of the laws.

The case also comes as figures in Britain revealed last week that the number of babies born weighing only 2lbs has more than doubled in just two years.  Yet the proportion of tiny babies born stillborn has nearly halved, the health service statistics have shown.  The figures do not reveal at what stage the babies were born but a child weighing under 2lbs is likely to have been born at least three months early.  They will inevitably include some born alive at an age when they could, in other circumstances, have been aborted.

More than 200,000 abortions are performed each year, most for non-medical reasons within the legal upper limit of 24 weeks gestation.

The increasing number of babies surviving below 24 weeks, partly because of advances in medicine, has led to widespread calls for the legal upper limit to be further reduced.

Attempts to lower the limit failed in Parliament in 2008.

In 2005 a baby boy in Manchester was born alive at 24 weeks after surviving three attempts to abort him. He is now a five-year-old schoolboy.

Related Articles

opine - Washington Takes A Break From Porn Surfing to Bail Out Wall Street (Ann Coulter, We.28Apr10)

From: kd Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 Subject: Bad PR
     Not bad PR just government controlled media....KD
 ANN COULTER
http://www.anncoulter.com 
  http://www.anncoulter.com

WASHINGTON TAKES BREAK FROM PORN SURFING TO BAIL OUT WALL STREET by Ann Coulter, April 28, 2010
Print Version: http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/printer_friendly.cgi?article=366

Democrats have decided that in order to prevent Wall Street from starting more financial meltdowns, wrecking the economy and leaving the American taxpayer holding the bag, we need to give more oversight authority to the same government employees who were busy surfing Internet porn as private investors frantically tried to warn them about Bernie Madoff.

The Democrats' financial "reform" bill also includes a $50 billion bailout fund -- that's million with a "B" -- that will save the Democrats from the unpleasant task of having to go on record voting for another Wall Street bailout.

Under the Democrats' bill, the FDIC will distribute the bailout money to Wall Street bankers without Congress having to take any action at all. (In the House version, the slush fund for the Democrats' Wall Street friends is $150 billion.)

True, the billions of dollars will be doled out to banks for the purpose of "dissolving" them. So what? They'll come back under a new name. But the guilty parties will lose no money for making bad bets -- although if the bets paid off, they'd take all the profits. That's what Democrats mean by "accountability."

Not surprisingly, the only politicians opposed to a permanent bailout fund for bankers are the politicians not owned by Wall Street -- that is, most Republicans, and one socialist, Bernie Sanders of Vermont.

The Democrats' defense of Wall Street's golden parachute is to say Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell used a "talking point" formulated for him by pollster Frank Luntz in opposing the bailout fund.

As Frank Rich explained in The New York Times, the bailout fund is not a bailout fund because "Sen. Mitch McConnell went on CNN to flog his big lie that the Senate reform bill somehow guaranteed bank bailouts -- a talking point long ago concocted for the GOP by its favorite spin strategist, Frank Luntz."

In other words, it must be a lie because ... because Frank Luntz told McConnell what to say and then McConnell said it on CNN!

Yes, and Steve Jobs gets his best ideas from parishilton.com.

Sen. McConnell doesn't need Frank Luntz to explain anything to him, least of all the financial reform bill. A fifth-grader could find out about the permanent bailout fund simply by reading the bill.

You will notice that neither Rich nor any of Wall Street's defenders specifically deny the existence of a permanent bank bailout fund in the Democrats' bill. They just say McConnell used a "talking point" to denounce it. (You might say this has become a "talking point" for Democrats defending the bill.)

Wall Street's defenders also crow that the money in the bailout fund won't come from taxpayers! (There's a newfound sympathy.) No sir, it will come from "the banks."

That's like saying that the original bailout money didn't come from the taxpayers -- it came from the government! Where do Democrats imagine banks and the government get their money?

Banks, like the government, are entities that spend money they collect from human beings. We'll all be charged up front to cover Gordon Gekko's future bad bets.

In other words, the Wall Street slush fund will be paid for by a group of despicable fat cats recently discovered by the Democrats known as People Who Have Bank Accounts. Damn them!

Another idea, based on the ancient concept of personal responsibility, comes from financial writer James Grant. He proposes that the bankers -- are you sitting down? -- take their own losses.

Let them keep their humongous salaries, Grant writes, but if their bank fails, "let the bankers themselves fail. Let the value of their houses, cars, yachts, paintings, etc. be assigned to the firm's creditors."

There's nothing wrong with speculation, creating derivatives or selling them, especially to sophisticated investors. The problem is that when the bets go bad, the speculators keep being back-stopped by the government -- i.e., "by me and people like me."

Strangely enough -- for a bill that allegedly sticks it to Wall Street -- during the Senate Banking Committee hearing this week, Goldman Sachs chairman Lloyd Blankfein endorsed the Dodd bill. Someone should have asked him who from Goldman wrote it.

In 2008, Goldman employees gave a record-breaking $1,007,370 to the Obama campaign.

This year, the "securities and investment" industry has already given twice as much money to the Democrats as to the Republicans.

ABC News reports that "the five biggest hedge fund donors all gave almost all their donations to Democrats." Among the biggest recipients of hedge fund money were Senators Harry Reid (Democrat), Chris Dodd (Democrat) and Charles Schumer (Democrat).

Even with the evidence right in front of their eyes, people still believe that it's the Republicans who are in Wall Street's pocket.

How out of touch with reality would a comedy writer have to be to write the following joke for Jay Leno this week: "The head of Goldman Sachs was going through security and was asked to empty his pockets -- and five Republican senators fell out."

Why didn't Barack Obama or Chuck Schumer fall out? Why not Rahm Emanuel, who worked for Goldman? Or Greg Craig, who used to work for Obama but just took a job with Goldman?

The fact that anyone laughed at that joke proves that Republicans have a serious PR problem.

COPYRIGHT 2010 ANN COULTER at http://www.anncoulter.com DISTRIBUTED BY UNIVERSAL UCLICK, 1130 Walnut, Kansas City, MO 64106

W Ketchup Urges Americans to Defeat Obamacare by Buying Gold


From: W Ketchup News Release  Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 Subject: W Ketchup Urges Americans to Defeat Obamacare by Buying Gold

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: For media inquiries contact Bill Zachary (917) 733-3038
If you are having trouble reading this press release, please go to this link: http://www.wketchup.com/newsreleases/091217.php
 

W Ketchup Urges Americans to Defeat Obamacare by Buying Gold

Eagle Bridge, NY - April 28, 2010 - In the Coinage Act of 1792, the first Congress of the United States fixed the value of a dollar to 24.725 grains of gold, valuing gold at $17.67 per ounce.  Under the Act, the government was required to exchange dollars for gold, and gold for dollars, for the public on demand at the fixed price at no cost.  Section 19 of the Act declared that any person who debased the coinage "shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and shall suffer death." From 1792 to 1933, Americans were free to choose if they wanted to hold dollars or gold.  During times of responsible government, most people choose the convenience of dollars, secured by the promise of government to convert their dollars back to gold on demand.  During deficit spending of irresponsible government, nervous citizens would quickly exchange their dollars for gold, which would drain the capital reserves of the Treasury and the banking system.  In order to entice people not to demand more gold, the Treasury would be forced to raise interest rates, in effect paying people for the risk of holding dollars.  The more irresponsible the government, the higher interest rates would need to climb to keep the state solvent. When governments engage in deficit spending, they require low interest rates to keep interest payments manageable.  High interest rates require greater interest payments on the same amount of debt, and negate the ability of politicians to increase spending.Thus the people, operating through the free market, could control the size of government. According to Bill Zachary, Chairman of W Ketchup: "The gold standard of the 19th century was an elegant system founded on individual liberty designed to maintain limited government by keeping state spending in check.  Disorganized individuals could defeat organized government factions simply by redeeming their dollars for gold and starving the state of capital. Limited government enforced by the gold standard was a primary cause of America?s rapid rise to economic greatness."
In 1793, during the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution, Robespierre made possession of gold punishable by death.  In 1917, during the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks confiscated all private gold for the benefit of the state.  In the 1930s, the Nazis passed a series of laws confiscating gold from large segments of its population. In 1933, the Democratic Party took control of the Federal government and criminalized individual ownership of gold, allowing massive expansion of the state.  Government spending grew from 11% of the economy in 1929 to 40% by 2009.  The Democratic Party, lead by President Obama, is currently increasing the size of government still further with initiatives such as Obamacare and the proposed Cap & Trade tax. Dan Oliver, CEO of W Ketchup, exhorts all Americans to buy gold now, saying: "Although the United States is no longer on a gold standard, the economic principles remain unchanged.  Every gold coin that an American buys puts upward pressure on the value of gold and downward pressure on the value of the currency - the exact same effect as during the gold standard.  As more individuals convert their dollars, the Fed will either raise interest rates to protect the currency, or allow the value of the currency to plummet.  Either path will bankrupt the state and end the forced march to socialism."
Oliver continued: "We do not call on Americans to buy gold to seek speculative profit, but as a mechanism to preserve individual wealth and to drive a stake through the heart of the Leviathan.  Our great nation was built on individual liberty and self-responsibility, including the duty for each American to understand basic monetary principles.  The failure of the conservative movement to shrink Washington demonstrates the futility of trusting in politicians or political movements.  Individuals at large buying gold forces the adoption of limited government through the free market.  We view the impending collapse of the dollar as a repudiation of big government that will provide a foundation for the restitution of our founding principles."
W Ketchup recommends all its customers keep a healthy supply of W Ketchup on hand at all times. To order delicious W Ketchup, please click on the link:  Order Ketchup
 
W Ketchup donates a portion of every purchase to the Freedom Alliance Scholarship Fund, which helps fund college tuition for the children of America's fallen heroes.

Founded in 2004, W Ketchup is a private company that makes ketchup in America solely from ingredients grown in the USA and does not support any liberal agendas.  Unlike other leading brands, W Ketchup does not own any subsidiaries that harm dolphins.  For more information contact 1-866-WKETCHUP, or write to 954 Lexington Ave, #236, New York, NY 10021-5013  Back to News

© 2004 W Ketchup,

Victory! Virginia Governor restores Jesus-prayers by Police Chaplains

From: Chaplain Klingenschmitt Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 Subject: Victory! Virginia Governor restores Jesus-prayers by Police Chaplains
PRESS RELEASE: Victory! Virginia Governor Restores Jesus-Prayers of Police Chaplains
Also breaking in the Washington Post now, read here: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/virginiapolitics/2010/04/mcdonnell_lifts_ban_on_state_p.html

             (Please forward this email to TV, radio, newspaper, blog reporters you know.)

Contact: Chaplain Klingenschmitt, www.PrayInJesusName.org, 719-360-5132, chaplaingate@yahoo.com

MEDIA ADVISORY, April 28 /Christian Newswire/ --

The Governor of Virginia Bob McDonnell has restored the rights of six State Police Chaplains to pray publicly "in Jesus name," reversing the policy of his predecessor Governor Tim Kaine who forced the chaplains to deny Christ or resign from their jobs.

"This victory comes after our two-year campaign for Jesus name," said Chaplain Klingenschmitt, who led a 1,000 person rally outside the Governor's mansion in 2008, then submitted up to 15,000 petitions to reinstate the chaplains jobs and free speech.

"We faxed voter guides to 2300+ Virginia pastors last summer, comparing Bob McDonnell, who campaigned for chaplains rights to pray in Jesus name, to his opponent Creigh Deeds who voted against Jesus prayers in the Senate. Those pastors helped us move the polls from 47-44% before our faxes, to the 59-41% victory for McDonnell on election day, because of this issue."

Now that McDonnell has fulfilled his campaign pledge, the six chaplain heroes including Rex Carter and Mike Honaker, who had turned in their badges rather than deny Christ, will be invited back to their chaplain jobs, and given free speech to pray "in Jesus name."

Chaplain Klingenschmitt will hold a press conference at noon on Monday, 3 May near the corner of 12th and Broad in Richmond Virginia (outside the Patrick Henry Building), to display the 15,000 petitions that helped Gov. McDonnell restore chaplains rights. Police chaplains are invited to come meet the media. For interviews now or then, call or email Chaplain Klingenschmitt at 719-360-5132 cell, chaplaingate@yahoo.com or Don Blake of the Virginia Christian Alliance, at 804-651-1700.
To read some of the 15,000 petitions we collected, visit:

http://prayinjesusname.org/blog_post/show/14/#

PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO TV, Radio, News, Blog REPORTERS YOU KNOW.
God Bless you, in Jesus' name, Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt

WE SPENT $28,000 FOR THIS VICTORY, BUT ONLY RAISED ABOUT $16,000 FOR EXPENSES.  CAN YOU PLEASE DONATE HERE TODAY?  EVERY LITTLE BIT HELPS! 
Disclaimer: The views of Chaplain Klingenschmitt, who was honorably but involuntarily discharged from the Navy in 2007 after facing court-martial for praying "in Jesus name" in uniform, (but was later vindicated by Congress), are his own personal views, not the views of any political party, government, or organization.
Constitution Society: Founding Documents Online Books+Federalist Papers History+Documents Quotations+American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta Declaration of Arbroathsmall speaker icon "Scots Wha Hae" History of: The US Bill of Rights Constitution+more Amendments

2nd Amendment - Why I Carry A Gun. [redux]

From: jrp Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010


Why I Carry a Gun


My old grandpa said to me 'Son, there comes a time in every man's life when he stops bustin' knuckles and starts bustin' caps and usually it's when he becomes too old to take a whoopin.'

I don't carry a gun to kill people.

I carry a gun to keep from being killed.

I don't carry a gun to scare people.
I carry a gun because sometimes this world can be a scary place.

I  don't carry a gun because I'm paranoid.
I carry a gun because there are real threats in the world..

I don't carry a gun because I'm evil.
I carry a gun  because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the world.

I don't carry a gun because I hate the government.
I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.

I don't carry a gun because I'm angry.
I carry a gun so that I don't have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be prepared.

I don't carry a gun because I want to shoot someone.
I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed, and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.

I don't carry a gun because I'm a cowboy.
I carry a gun because, when I die and go to heaven, I want to be a cowboy.

I don't carry a gun to make me feel like a man.
I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love.

I don't carry a gun because I feel inadequate.
I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.

I don't carry a gun because I love it.
I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me.

Police protection is an oxymoron.  Free citizens must protect themselves.
Police do not protect you from crime, they usually just investigate the crime after it happens and then call someone in to clean up the mess. 

Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take a whoopin'.
Constitution Society: Founding Documents Online Books+Federalist Papers History+Documents Quotations+American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta Declaration of Arbroathsmall speaker icon "Scots Wha Hae" History of: The US Bill of Rights Constitution+more Amendments

o'humor - Barrack Bingo

From: piloto Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010
Here is something to help make Obama's speeches more interesting. Just print out this page, distribute it to your friends, and go listen...(be sure to read directions at the bottom)





Rules for Barack's Bingo 
1. Before Barrack Obama's next televised speech, print your "O'Bingo" 
2. Check off the appropriate block when you hear one of those words/phrases. 
3. When you get five blocks horizontally, vertically, or diagonally, stand up and shout "BULL!"

Testimonials from past satisfied "O'Bingo" players:
"I had been listening to the speech for only five minutes when I won." - Jack W.,Boston

"My attention span during speeches has improved dramatically." - David D., Florida

"What a gas! Speeches will never be the same for me after my first win." - Bill R., New York City

The atmosphere was tense in the last speech as 14 of us waited for the fifth box." - Ben G., Denver

"The speaker was stunned as eight of us screamed "BULL!" for the third time in two hours." - Harry A, Chantilly

"This is the most fun I have ever had with my pants up!" Robert H. Portland

2010 & 2012 - Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr: Time for the 28th Amendment

From: guerra Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010
Congressman John Fleming -   Representing the 4th District of Louisiana
Go to this congressman's web site http://fleming.house.gov/HRes615/ and you will find out that our congress is attempting to tweak the HR 615 Bill that forces them to take Obama Care Insurance.  They are trying to worm their way out of it and keep their Federal Employee Health Benefits Insurance 
GRRRRRRRRRR.....! I'm MAD AND YOU WILL BE TOO! 
Your   U.S.  House & Senate have voted themselves raises at $4,700 in the House and $5,300 in the Senate.

1.     They voted to not give you Social Security cost of living raise in 2010 and 2011 


2.     Your Medicare premiums will go up $285.60 for the 2-years and you will not get the 3% COLA: $660/yrYour total 2-yr loss and cost is -$1,600 each or -$3,200 for husband and wife. 
3.     Over 2-yrs The House & Senate each get $10,000 raises.







4.     Do you feel

SCREWED? 









5.    WILL your cost of drugs - doctor fees - local taxes - food, etc., increase?  You better believe they will!  WILL THEIRS?   NO WAY .. They have a raise and better benefits. Why care about you? You never did anything about it in the past. You're obviously too stupid or don't care No offense; just making a point! 
6.     Do you really think that Nancy, Harry, Chris, Charlie, Barnie, et al, care about you? 
SEND THE MESSAGE  You're FIRED.


IN 2010 YOU WILL HAVE A CHANCE TO GET RID OF THE SITTING CONGRESS, THAT IS 1/3 OF THE SENATE, AND 100% OF THE HOUSE MAKE SURE YOU'RE STILL MAD IN NOVEMBER 2010 AND TELL THEIR REPLACEMENTS NOT TO SCREW UP.It is ok to forward this to your sphere of influence if you are finally tired of the abuse.

Maybe it's time for the........ 28th Amendment
"Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States."
Let's get this passed around, folks - these people in Washington have brought this upon themselves!!!  It's time for retribution.  Let's take back America.
Constitution Society: Founding Documents Online Books+Federalist Papers History+Documents Quotations+American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta Declaration of Arbroathsmall speaker icon "Scots Wha Hae" History of: The US Bill of Rights Constitution+more Amendments