war, the long war - "Send 'em up, I'll wait!" (photo)

From: baja Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 

Love it!  This  has got to be one of the greatest quotes of all time. I thought this might make you smile. :-)   ...conversation overheard on the VHF Guard (emergency) frequency 121.5 MHz while flying from Europe to Dubai .

Iranian Air Defense Site: 'Unknown aircraft you are in Iranian airspace. Identify yourself.' 
Aircraft: 'This is a United States aircraft. I am in Iraqi airspace.' 
Air Defense Site: 'You are in Iranian airspace. If you do not depart our airspace we will launch interceptor aircraft!' 
Aircraft: 'This is a United States Marine Corps FA-18 fighter.  Send 'em up, I'll wait!' 
Air Defense Site: ( .... total silence) 
God bless our troops.
There is something about a Marine that makes other countries listen to reason.


Support our Troops:  http://harrold.org/rfhextra/support_our_troops.html

---

o'traveller- during the oil spill ... a photo timeline from the 1st day 1Apr10 'till 19Jun10!

From: burd Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010

He has been busy!  A "photo calendar" of o'il slick's travels.

We have been assured by the "President" that he has been on top of this thing (national tragedy) from day one. His speech (written some time in advance by those in control) was given by man who seemed be a little uneasy with his ability to continue the scam.

Obama during the oil spill ..... in photos

From PolitiPage.com

Obama during oil spill — golf, parties, photo-ops… and more golf! (photos)

Posted on PolitiPage.com by Kevin Kristy Headlines, Latest News, The O Spill on May 28, 2010

By The Numbers
Rounds of golf: 8 – 4/23, 4/24, 5/8, 5/15, 5/16, 5/22, 6/13, 6/19
States visited before stepping foot in Louisiana: 6 – NC, NY, IL, CA, IA, MO
Concerts: 2 – 6/2 (McCartney), 6/6 (Kelly Clarkson)
Comedy shows: 2 - 5/1 (Leno), 6/6 (George Lopez)
Vacations: 2 – 4/23-4/25 (Asheville, NC), 5/28-5/31 (Chicago)

The Gulf oil spill began on April 20, 2010.  Robert Gibbs can't explain how engaged Barack H. Obama was after these photos  appeared on the Internet.:

Check here to see the photo montage:  http://politipage.com/2010/05/28/obamas-days

Folks on the Gulf Coast can't be happy as they view those photos.

---

o'confused - One father too many

 

From: Focus on the Family Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 Subject:  One father too many

 

article source: http://www.focusonlinecommunities.com/blogs/Finding_Home/2010/06/23/one-father-too-many

This message contains graphics. If you do not see the graphics, click here to view

Marriage | Parenting | Online Communities | Media Center | Family Store | Support Family Ministry         Dear Friend, This past weekend, our country took time to celebrate Father's Day and the unique impact our fathers have had in our lives. What you may not know is that President Obama's Father's Day proclamation equated two-father families to those headed by a married mother and father. Here at Focus on the Family®, we know that kids need both a mother and a father, and two fathers cannot make up for not having a mother. Focus President Jim Daly addressed President Obama's proclamation in a recent post, originally published in The Washington Post's "On Faith" blog. Please take a moment to read it below. For faith and family, Tom Minnery , Senior Vice President, Government & Public Policy   One Father Too Many Jim Daly President, Focus on the Family The Obama administration is actively changing the cultural norms of our country. Equally troubling, the nation's chief executive is doing so at the expense of our most vulnerable—the rising ranks of fatherless children. I'm disappointed President Obama has marred an otherwise noble initiative designed to raise awareness of, and offer solutions for, father absence with a political tip of the cap to advocates of homosexual parenting. This past Sunday, the 100th anniversary of Father's Day, within the  traditional White House proclamation, the president included a single incendiary sentence that not only undermines the unique and complementary roles of mothers and fathers, but also one which science simply does not support. "Nurturing families come in many forms," wrote the president, "and children may be raised by a father and mother, a single father, two fathers, a step father, a grandfather, or caring guardian." It was only last month, on the occasion of Mother's Day, that the president offered a similar nod to lesbians by adding "two mothers" to the myriad of traditional parenting options. Literally speaking, he is right, of course. Children can be, and are, raised by numerous combinations of relatives and other authoritative figures of various sexual orientations. But the inclusion of the reference to "two fathers" and "two mothers" is clearly a deliberate and strategic decision. Even those most sympathetic and enthusiastic about the president's agenda acknowledge that President Obama is very carefully and quietly transforming homosexual politics and policy on the federal level. With the use of his executive authority he is actively engaged in an attempt to normalize the public's perception of homosexuality—from supporting the repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, to extending and expanding health care coverage for homosexual partners of federal employees. If Plato was right—that the beginning is the most important part of the work, the administration's recent shift is especially perplexing and unsettling. Last June, on the Friday prior to Father's Day 2009, I sat in the East Room of the White House. I was an invited guest of the president and participated in what was then the administration's first official celebration of fatherhood. It was a remarkably bipartisan event, free of political rancor and awash with a unity of purpose. Despite having significant ideological and philosophical differences with President Obama on a host of other substantive issues, I was encouraged to confirm that which I had long hoped—that the president and I share a mutual commitment regarding the importance of a father in the life of a child. In the days following my visit, I encountered criticism from some conservatives for accepting the invitation. Although good people can differ on strategy and tactics, I believe Christians who are committed to engaging and transforming the culture are wise to engage those with the authority to transform and reform public policy itself. At the time, I commended the president because I thought he was right and that it would be wrong to remain silent. One year later, in suggesting that a family led by two fathers or two mothers is the moral and social equivalent of a family guided by one mother and one father, I must respectfully say that I think he is wrong. In elevating and equating the influence of a two-father family to that of all other traditional forms, the administration is, perhaps unknowingly, depriving children of the opportunity to have the very thing the president has so strongly and eloquently suggested they need most: A mom and a dad. As the product of a fatherless home myself, I am keenly aware of, and extremely sensitive to, the harsh realities of a home life that is less than ideal. In fact, the president and I share this common background, and so I immediately identify with his compassion and his desire to use the bully pulpit to ease suffering and meet the needs of the neediest among us. But the fatherhood "effect" is not cumulative—two daddies are not better than one; nor is a mother dispensable or replaceable. Instead of expending precious (and finite) energy and resources on selling the merits of two- father or two-mother families, the administration would be wise to invest and encourage the loving presence of both a mom and a dad. Follow me on Twitter @DalyFocus

---

o'illegal - SHAMnesty

From: gg Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Blink, blink boink! GG

Shamnesty.......!

SHAMnesty exmaninblues | June 22, 2010 at 11:26 am | URL: http://wp.me/pVgzx-1U

They say the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. One such paving stone is the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986. At that time, about 3 million illegal aliens were living in the United States. IRCA was a "one time" amnesty act, which granted immunity to various crimes such as illegal entry, illegal residency, and fraud. The idea was to give 3 million people a pass, improve the process of immigration, and strengthen border security. About 2.7 million illegal aliens benefited from this immunity, which does not include family members who eventually were brought over to join these new Americans. Well, like that popular potato chip, politicians can't have just one! Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post

---

Can it get any worse? "Ban America's Flag in Schools?"

"The sun hangs low on the horizon." -- GB (2009)

"Arm your self with the ballot, while you still have arms." -- rfh

"Would you believe that a large percentage of o'bamastapo lunatics are voting 36% to ban the American Flag from schools out of fear from Mexican reprisals!" -- rfh

From:  GG Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 Subject:  Your help is needed - America's flag to be banned?

Getting weird hardly, it has been weird since Congress/Senate/House whichever is responsible for vetting Presidential candidates obviously didn't! -- G B

G; This is getting wierd.  What is wrong with the Dems(SEIU is the union organization that Obama and Obiden are catering to.)  This is truly nutty.  Got this from a friend in ND. 

 Your help is needed.

Fox is running a poll about whether the flag should be banned in schools in order not to inflame Hispanic students.  The poll is being sandbagged by SEIU and we should mount a counter action if you agree with me that the flag should be taken down for no one.   Moveon.org, Organizing for America, and SEIU have been twittering today to go to Fox Poll and vote to ban the Flag .... and right now it is working!  [George Soro's o'puppet's "domestic security force" brownshirts."]

SHOW THEM WHAT TRUE PATRIOTS BELIEVE!!!   Let's flip those numbers and show the leftists we are organized and on the move....  flip the numbers now - FLIP THE HOUSE in November! 

GO HERE NOW, join the polling:  

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/06/american-flag-banned-america/

..........and then pass it along, please!

---

keywords: appeasement, deport, arrest, repatriate, lack of convictions, Un-American, pandering, illegal aliens,  soverignty, national security, American Values, communist, National Socialist Democrat (Arbeiter) Party, "fundamentally transform", o'mam, o'who?, marxist,  "spread the wealth", tax and spend, o'robin hood, o'manchurian, o'thief-in-the-night,  

o'humor - Your Federal Government At Work "Cattle Guards"

From: baja Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 Subject: Your Federal Government At Work...

For those of you who have never traveled to the west, or southwest, cattle guards are horizontal steel rails placed at fence openings, in dug-out places in the roads adjacent to highways (sometimes across highways), to prevent cattle from crossing over that area. For some reason the cattle will not step on the "guards," probably because they fear getting their feet caught between the rails.

A few months ago, President Obama received and was reading a report that there were over 100,000 cattle guards in Colorado.  Colorado ranchers had protested his proposed changes in grazing policies, so he ordered the Secretary of the Interior to fire half of the cattle guards immediately!!

Before the Secretary of the Interior could respond and presumably try to straighten him out, Vice-President, Joe Biden, intervened with a request that, before any cattle guards were fired, they be given six months of retraining. 

And these guys are running our country, OMG!!   Passed on to you without further comment....

---

o'generalisimo - General McCrystal (Rolling Stone Magazine)

From: baja Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010

article source:  http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236

The Runaway General

Stanley McChrystal, Obama's top commander in Afghanistan, has seized control of the war by never taking his eye off the real enemy: The wimps in the White House.

By  Michael Hastings, Rolling Stone Politics, June 22, 2010

This article appears in RS 1108/1109 from July 8-22, 2010, on newsstands Friday, June 25.

Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, commander of NATO's International Security Assistance Force and U.S. Forces-Afghanistan, works on board a Lockheed C-130 Hercules aircraft between Battlefield Circulation missions. 

U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Mark O'Donald/NATO

'How'd I get screwed into going to this dinner?" demands Gen. Stanley McChrystal.  It's a Thursday night in mid-April, and the commander of all U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan is sitting in a four-star suite at the Hôtel Westminster in Paris.  He's in France to sell his new war strategy to our NATO allies – to keep up the fiction, in essence, that we actually have allies.  Since McChrystal took over a year ago, the Afghan war has become the exclusive property of the United States.  Opposition to the war has already toppled the Dutch government, forced the resignation of Germany's president and sparked both Canada and the Netherlands to announce the withdrawal of their 4,500 troops.  McChrystal is in Paris to keep the French, who have lost more than 40 soldiers in Afghanistan, from going all wobbly on him. 

"The dinner comes with the position, sir," says his chief of staff, Col. Charlie Flynn. 
McChrystal turns sharply in his chair.
"Hey, Charlie," he asks, "does this come with the position?"
McChrystal gives him the middle finger.

More on General McChrystal

• Hastings on Replacing McChrystal: Can Petraeus Win the War?
  
  
  
• Photos: On the Ground with the Runaway General
  
  
  
• Revolt of the Troops: Hastings Reports In From Afghanistan

The general stands and looks around the suite that his traveling staff of 10 has converted into a full-scale operations center.  The tables are crowded with silver Panasonic Toughbooks, and blue cables crisscross the hotel's thick carpet, hooked up to satellite dishes to provide encrypted phone and e-mail communications.   Dressed in off-the-rack civilian casual – blue tie, button-down shirt, dress slacks – McChrystal is way out of his comfort zone.   Paris, as one of his advisers says, is the "most anti-McChrystal city you can imagine."   The general hates fancy restaurants, rejecting any place with candles on the tables as too "Gucci."   He prefers Bud Light Lime (his favorite beer) to Bordeaux, Talladega Nights (his favorite movie) to Jean-Luc Godard.   Besides, the public eye has never been a place where McChrystal felt comfortable: Before President Obama put him in charge of the war in Afghanistan, he spent five years running the Pentagon's most secretive black ops.

 "What's the update on the Kandahar bombing?" McChrystal asks Flynn.   The city has been rocked by two massive car bombs in the past day alone, calling into question the general's assurances that he can wrest it from the Taliban.
"We have two KIAs, but that hasn't been confirmed," Flynn says.
McChrystal takes a final look around the suite.   At 55, he is gaunt and lean, not unlike an older version of Christian Bale in Rescue Dawn.   His slate-blue eyes have the unsettling ability to drill down when they lock on you.   If you've f----d up or disappointed him, they can destroy your soul without the need for him to raise his voice.
"I'd rather have my a-- kicked by a roomful of people than go out to this dinner," McChrystal says.
He pauses a beat.
"Unfortunately," he adds, "no one in this room could do it."
With that, he's out the door.
"Who's he going to dinner with?" I ask one of his aides.
"Some French minister," the aide tells me. "It's f-----g gay."
The next morning, McChrystal and his team gather to prepare for a speech he is giving at the École Militaire, a French military academy.   The general prides himself on being sharper and ballsier than anyone else, but his brashness comes with a price: Although McChrystal has been in charge of the war for only a year, in that short time he has managed to p--- off almost everyone with a stake in the conflict.    Last fall, during the question-and-answer session following a speech he gave in London, McChrystal dismissed the counterterrorism strategy being advocated by Vice President Joe Biden as "shortsighted," saying it would lead to a state of "Chaos-istan."    The remarks earned him a smackdown from the president himself, who summoned the general to a terse private meeting aboard Air Force One.    The message to McChrystal seemed clear:    Shut the f--- up, and keep a lower profile.


Now, flipping through printout cards of his speech in Paris, McChrystal wonders aloud what Biden question he might get today, and how he should respond.    "I never know what's going to pop out until I'm up there, that's the problem," he says.    Then, unable to help themselves, he and his staff imagine the general dismissing the vice president with a good one-liner.
"Are you asking about Vice President Biden?" McChrystal says with a laugh.   "Who's that?"
"Biden?" suggests a top adviser.   "Did you say: Bite Me?"

When Barack Obama entered the Oval Office, he immediately set out to deliver on his most important campaign promise on foreign policy: to refocus the war in Afghanistan on what led us to invade in the first place.  "I want the American people to understand," he announced in March 2009.    "We have a clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan."    He ordered another 21,000 troops to Kabul, the largest increase since the war began in 2001.    Taking the advice of both the Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he also fired Gen. David McKiernan – then the U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan – and replaced him with a man he didn't know and had met only briefly: Gen. Stanley McChrystal.    It was the first time a top general had been relieved from duty during wartime in more than 50 years, since Harry Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur at the height of the Korean War.

Even though he had voted for Obama, McChrystal and his new commander in chief failed from the outset to connect.    The general first encountered Obama a week after he took office, when the president met with a dozen senior military officials in a room at the Pentagon known as the Tank.    According to sources familiar with the meeting, McChrystal thought Obama looked "uncomfortable and intimidated" by the roomful of military brass.    Their first one-on-one meeting took place in the Oval Office four months later, after McChrystal got the Afghanistan job, and it didn't go much better.    "It was a 10-minute photo op," says an adviser to McChrystal.    "Obama clearly didn't know anything about him, who he was.    Here's the guy who's going to run his f-----g war, but he didn't seem very engaged.    The Boss was pretty disappointed."

---

opine - Coulter on Kagan: "What a sack of sacrosanct"

From: kd Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010

 Visit:http://AnnCoulter.com 

---

What a sack of sacrosanct

Posted: June 23, 2010 © 2010 

In the New York Times' profile on the family of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, her aunt was quoted as saying: "There was thinking, always thinking" at the family's dinner table. "Nothing was sacrosanct."

Really? Nothing was sacrosanct? Because in my experience, on a scale of 1-to-infinity, the range of acceptable opinion among New York liberals goes from 1-to-1.001.

How would the following remarks fare at a dinner table on the Upper West Side where "nothing was sacrosanct": Hey, maybe that Joe McCarthy was onto something. What would prayer in the schools really hurt? How do we know gays are born that way? Is it possible that union demands have gone too far? Does it make sense to have three recycling bins in these microscopic Manhattan apartments? Say, has anyone read Charles Murray's latest book?

Those comments, considered "conversation starters" in most of the country, would get you banned from polite society in New York. Also, unless you want the whole room slowly backing away from you, also avoid: May I smoke? I heard it on Fox News, and Merry Christmas!

Even members of survivalist Christian cults in Idaho at least know people who hold opposing views. New York liberals don't.

As Kagan herself described it, on the Upper West Side of New York where she grew up, "Nobody ever admitted to voting Republican." So, I guess you could say being a Democrat was "sacrosanct." Even within the teeny-tiny range of approved liberal opinion in New York, disagreement will get you banned from the premises.

When, as dean of the Harvard Law School, Kagan disagreed with the Bill Clinton policy of "Don't ask, don't tell" for gays in the military, she open-mindedly banned military recruiters from the law school, denouncing Clinton's policy as "discriminatory," "deeply wrong," "unwise and unjust."

From this, I conclude that having gays serving openly in the military is "sacrosanct" for liberals.

Having gays NOT serve in the military is a position held by lots of people in other parts of the country, but I do not recall any Christian colleges banning military recruiters because the schools believed "Don't ask, don't tell" went too far the other way.

Not only is every weird, shared delusion of the New York liberal deemed sacrosanct, but what ought to be sacrosanct – off the top of my head, human life – isn't.

As Stan Evans says, whatever liberals disapprove of, they want banned (smoking, guns, practicing Christianity, ROTC, the Pledge of Allegiance) and whatever they approve of, they make mandatory (abortion-on-demand, gay marriage, pornography, condom distribution in public schools, screenings of "An Inconvenient Truth").

When liberals say, "nothing is sacrosanct," they mean "nothing other Americans consider sacrosanct is sacrosanct." They demonstrate their open-mindedness by ridiculing other people's dogma, but will not brook the most trifling criticism of their own dogmas.

Thus, for example, liberals sneer at the bluenoses and philistines of the "religious right" for objecting to taxpayer-funding of a crucifix submerged in a jar of urine, but would have you banned from public life for putting Matthew Shepard in a jar of urine, with or without taxpayer funding.

These famously broad-minded New Yorkers – "thinking, always thinking" – actually booed Mayor Rudy Giuliani when he showed up at the opera after pulling city funding from a museum exhibit that included a painting of the Virgin Mary plastered with close-up pornographic photos of women's vulvas.

(The New York Times fair-mindedly refused to ever mention the vulvas, instead suggesting that the mayor's objection was to the cow dung used in the composition.)

Has a decision to fund or not fund "art" ever gotten a politician in any other part of the country booed in public? And how might the Times refer to citizens booing a mayor who had withdrawn taxpayer funding for a painting of Rosa Parks covered in pornography?

If New York liberals insist on bragging about their intellectual bravado in believing "nothing is sacrosanct," it would really help if they could stop being the most easily offended, P.C., group-think, thin-skinned weenies in the entire universe and maybe ease up on the college "hate speech" codes, impeachment hearings for a president's policies and bans on military recruiters.

With that in mind, here are some questions it would be fun to ask a New York liberal like Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan at her hearings next week:

Roughly one-third of Americans are evangelical Christians. Do you personally know any evangelical Christians? Name two.

In 1972, Richard Nixon was elected president with more than 60 percent of the vote, winning every state except Massachusetts and the District of Columbia. How many people do you know who voted for Nixon?

Appropriate or inappropriate: Schools passing out condoms to seventh-graders? Schools passing out cigarettes to seventh-graders?

Who is a greater threat to America, Sarah Palin or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?

Order Ann's best-seller "Guilty: Liberal 'Victims' and Their Assault on America" – autographed! – for just $4.95.

Would you like to be notified each Wednesday when Ann's latest column hits WND? Then sign up for WND News Alerts now.   Ann Coulter, well-known for her TV appearances as a political analyst, is an attorney and author.  EMAIL ANN COULTER | GO TO ANN COULTER ARCHIVE Experience Coulter's wit and wisdom up close and personal as she headlines WND's Taking America Back national conference this fall! 

---

o'scamcare & o'mam - Dhimmitude

related:  http://harrold.org/rfhextra/religion.html & http://harrold.org/rfhextra/menu.htm

"Arm your self with the ballot, while you still have arms." -- rfh

From: hh Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010

VOTING IN NOVEMBER IS A MUST IF WE HOPE TO TURN  THINGS AROUND !!!                              

Word of the Day: Dhimmitude

Need something to get your blood boiling????
Has anyone heard of this new word?  Dhimmitude?
Amish and other religious groups may be exempt from forced purchase of healthcare policies under Obama care.   You know what other groups this could include are Muslims and Christian Scientists.  They may be exempt from having to have government healthcare.  Unbelievable!

I had my doubts so I checked with Snopes.   There is an exemption for "certain religious groups" in  the Health Care Bill. Obama supporters check it out yourself.

Had never heard the word until now---Type it into Google and start reading  Pretty interesting.  Note that Muslims and certain other religions are exempt from the Obamacare penalties and it is supported by law.  We are surrendering from within!  The prez is leading us right down the path to total Muslim control and you don't care!  Maybe you voted for him but now the truth comes out.  Maybe you should rethink what you have done.

Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-muslim populations conquered through jihad.  Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to islam.

The ObamaCare bill is the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia muslim diktat in the United States . Muslims may be specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be "gambling", "risk-taking" and "usury" and is thus banned.  Muslims may be specifically granted exemption based on this.  How convenient.  So I John Smith, as a Christian, will have crippling IRS liens placed against all of my assets, including real estate, cattle, cars and etc. and even accounts receivables, and will face hard prison time because I refuse to buy insurance or pay the penalty tax.   Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such penalty and will have 100% of his health needs paid for by the de facto government insurance at our expence.   Non-muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize muslims. Period. This is Dhimmitude.

Dhimmitude serves two purposes: it enriches the muslim masters AND serves to drive conversions to islam. In this case, the incentive to convert to islam will be taken up by those in the inner-cities as well as the godless Generation X, Y and Z types who have no moral anchor or belief in God! If you don't believe in Christ to begin with, it is no problem whatsoever to sell Him for 30 pieces of silver.   "Sure, I'll be a muslim if it means free health insurance and no taxes. Where do I sign, brother?"   Now all you Obama voters get in line for your free stuff!  ...However, I suggest you don't hold your breath!...

This is desperately important and people need to know about it and what the past election has done to all of us!
P.S.   Have you heard about the summit Obama is holding this month in D.C. for the future Muslim business leaders in the U.S.?   He wants to increase their ability to begin business opportunities in the U.S. for the Muslim community!   Better start looking for a country that doesn't cater to the Muslims ~ Austrailia doesn't because this country will be overrun by Muslims like Europe is currently experiencing.   And you thought our problem was the Mexicans! ......

Click here: Dhimmitude - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhimmitude

---

humor - The Route of the Problem & Jack Webb teaches o'who?

From: PatriotPost.US  Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010

source online:  http://media.patriotpost.us/humor/2010-06-22.html

The Route of the Problem

Sitting on the side of the highway waiting to catch speeding drivers, a state police officer sees a car puttering along at 22 MPH. He thinks to himself, "This driver is just as dangerous as a speeder!" So he turns on his lights and pulls the driver over.

Approaching the car, he notices that there are five old ladies — two in the front seat and three in the back — eyes wide and pale as ghosts.

The driver, obviously confused, says to him, "Officer, I don't understand. I was doing exactly the speed limit! What seems to be the problem?"

"Ma'am," the officer replies, "You weren't speeding, but you should know that driving slower than the speed limit can also be a danger to other drivers."

"Slower than the speed limit?" she asks. "No sir, I was doing the speed limit — exactly 22 miles per hour!" the old woman says a bit proudly. The officer, trying to contain a chuckle, explains to her that "22" is the route number and not the speed limit. A bit embarrassed, the woman grins and thanks the officer for pointing out her error.

"But before I let you go, Ma'am, I have to ask: is everyone in this car ok? These women seem awfully shaken and they haven't made a single peep this whole time."

"Oh, they'll be OK in a minute, officer. We just got off Route 119."

---

Jack Webb Schools Obama

Someone out in the magical world of the Web with too much time on their hands has ingeniously spliced footage of Obama and Joe Friday and the resulting interplay is a fun watch:

Jack Webb Schools Obama on Respect for Police  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXlu-hwPrrw

Jack Webb Schools Barack Obama on America  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4r6YCUtxfs

Hmm. Come to think of it, those guys look familar...

Motivation

And now for a cartoon

  If you enjoy Patriot Humor, you should check out our other online resources:

Opinion

• William Murchison: Good For You, Joe Barton
  
• Debra Saunders: If You Can't Budget, You Can't Govern
  
• Rebecca Hagelin: Addicted to Porn
  
• Paul Greenberg: Is This Jimmy Carter's Second Term
  
• David Limbaugh: Please Read 'The Grand Jihad'
  
• Thomas Sowell: Degeneration of Democracy
  
• Mona Charen: The Trouble With World Opinion
  
• Cal Thomas: Bonhoeffer: A True Believer
  
• Jeff Jacoby: The Instrument of Crime Remains Only an Instrument
  
• Ken Blackwell: Markets and Morals
  
• Michael Barone: Obama's Thuggery Is Useless in Fighting Spill
  
• Burt Prelutsky: The Trojan Ship
  
• Michael Reagan: A Father's Day Message
  
• Debra Saunders: University of Anarchy and No Consequences
  
• Roy Exum: My 'Precious Lord'

Patriot Headlines

• Furious President Obama Summons Gen. Stanley McChrystal to D.C.
  
• States Launch Joint Probe of Google Wi-Fi Snooping
  
• Dems Won't Pass Budget in 2010
  
• Orszag Becomes First Obama Cabinet Member to Bail
  
• Pelosi: Climate Change Legislation is a 'Moral Issue'
  
• Los Angeles Ready to Drop AZ Boycott
  
• White House Mocks BP CEO's Yacht Race, Defends Obama's Golf Outing
  
• Obama to Announce New Health 'Benefits'
  
• Jimmy Carter Worries Court Ruling May Affect His Interaction With Terror Groups
  
• Iran Sanctions Deal Reached
  
• Iran Bans 2 IAEA Inspectors From Entering
  
• Former Israeli Top Spy Calls for Strike on Iran

Policy

• The Heritage Foundation
  
• The Cato Institute
  
• Hoover Institution
  
• National Rifle Association
  
• Ludwig von Mises Institute
  
• National Center for Policy Analysis

  To submit humor items for our consideration, email us at humor@patriotpost.  To subscribe to Patriot Humor and The Patriot Post, link to http://patriotpost.us/subscribe/. To manage your subscription or to unsubscribe, link to http://patriotpost.us/manage/ and log in with your email address.

---

1st & 2nd Amendments - Disclose Act HR-5175 vote tomorrow! imits Free Speech (for some!)

Remember in November.

 

Once dangerous and draconian laws like this HR 5175 are passed, "socialist good for nothings" will add regulations and enforcment provisions that ultimately could reach even to the pulpit!   The National Socialist Democrat (Arbeiter) Party (NSDAP) is desperately pushing for "transformation" legislation to further their socialist agenda before the November 2010 elections.   In an effort to control the ballot, stifle dissent, and let big unions' moneys fund leftists and liberal candidates, the NSDAP needs this "disclosure threat" to silence 'right thinking' blogs, conservative news talk, and to prevent private organizations and Christian groups from having an equal footing against the 'domestic security forces' of the 'street organizer' now occupying the White House.  Please, take a moment and call your Congressman / Congresswoman.  If you have time, send a fax too!  o'commissar will be in office until January 2013 and we need to vote as many of his leftist cronies out of office as possible this November, e.g. Filner in south San Diego, California  and the Imperial County to the east.  -- rfh

 

"Arm your self with the ballot, while you still have arms." -- rfh

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Dudley Brown

Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:39 PM

Subject: Free Speech limitation vote tomorrow

Reports are that Nancy Pelosi will schedule a vote tomorrow (Thursday, June 24) on the DISCLOSE Act, so you must act now to protect your gun rights. Disclose (HR 5175)would silence almost every pro-gun organization in America... Except the NRA. In fact, the DISCLOSE Act was dead in the water until the NRA cut a deal to exempt itself (and a few big liberal groups like AARP and probably MoveOn.org) last week. Please contact your Congressman Rep. Bob Filner right away and again Thursday at (202) 225-8045 or by email. The goal of this draconian legislation is to make pro-freedom groups – like the National Association for Gun Rights – shut their mouths. And without politicians who are held accountable, there's almost no way to defend our gun rights. As of early last week, this bill had a dicey future, but Pelosi, Reid and Schumer agreed to exempt the NRA (who is no longer opposing this bill because of their special deal). That backroom deal made the bill much more likely to pass (which is, of course, why Dem leadership exempted the NRA). In fact, Capitol insiders say Harry Reid may be the driving force for this exemption. Reid is in a very tough re-election race in Nevada, but the NRA has all but endorsed him (see the latest NRA magazine, with many flattering pictures of Reid). If he's held accountable for his bad votes on the gun issue, he will almost certainly lose – which is why he'd like to silence all of the pro-gun groups except the one that's supporting him. But that's another story for another time. You must act today to defeat this fiasco. Your actions have stalled this bill, and made Democrat leadership delay the vote (in an attempt to avoid the maelstrom of conservative activists who have loudly voiced their opposition to this bill). But now they're emboldened by the calm in the storm. We can't let that happen. You must call your Member of Congress today. Yes, the NRA's sell-out on this issue is epic. But it seems they're going to defend their deal until the bitter end. It should not be forgotten, but we must put the heat on members of Congress. Call Congressman Rep. Bob Filner today at (202) 225-8045 and/or send him an e-mail and tell them to oppose the DISCLOSE Act, regardless of the deal. Also tell them that you will consider a vote for the DISCLOSE ACT as a vote against your gun rights (it is – what will we use to defend our gun rights with, if we don't have the first amendment right to free speech?). Call or e-mail their offices today, and send this to everyone you know. Thank you for your activism, Dudley Brown Executive Director To help the National Association for Gun Rights grow, please forward this to a friend. To view this email as a web page, please click this link: view online. Help fight gun control. Donate to the National Association for Gun Rights!

---

I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.
We are a community of 7 million users fighting spam.
SPAMfighter has removed 1063 of my spam emails to date.
The Professional version does not have this message.

o'illegal - ICE Agents: "We've Lost America"

From: baja Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010

MORON: Obama's Immigration Chief Orders Release of ALL Violent Criminal Illegal Aliens; ICE Agents: "We've Lost America"

Source: June 22, 2010

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/23516/moron-obamas-immigration-chief-orders-agents-to-free-violent-criminal-illegal-aliens-ends-detention-ice-agents-weve-lost-america/

Recently, you may have read reports that Barack Obama's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) chief, John "Moron" Morton, said he may not accept illegal aliens detained under Arizona's immigration law.  But it gets worse. Far, far worse. Moron ordered ICE agents to FREE violent criminal illegal aliens until they are convicted at trial . . . a trial to which they will never show up (because they were set free to disappear). To that end, he's dropped all reference to the word "detention" in an ICE reorganization.

Moron: Obama Immigration Chief John Morton Says

"Set Violent Criminal Illegal Aliens Free on the Streets."

Many agents within ICE tell me they are extremely demoralized because, until recently, Morton has instructed them not to detain and lock up illegal aliens unless they have a criminal record.  But, now, Morton told agents that even illegal aliens who are accused of serious crimes, like rape and murder, must be set free . . . until they are convicted.  Think these illegal aliens charged with serious crimes will show up for trial, once they've been set free?  Think again.  This policy is clearly by design, and it comes straight from the Obama White House, the agents tell me.

Moreover, many ICE agents sent me a memo (posted later on in this entry) which Morton sent out, reorganizing ICE and changing the name of ICE's Detention and Removal Operation to "Enforcement and Removal Operations."  In other words, no more detention.  Almost all references to the word "detention" are gone.  Just more catch and release of illegal aliens.  So, what's the point of having the I in ICE?  I'm not sure, and frustrated agents aren't either.

In May, Morton made a visit to the Chicago ICE office. His statements and behavior dismayed ICE agents to the point that several of them told me "we have lost this country." Here is one account which mirrors what I've heard from so many other agents within the floundering agency:

"Morton showed up with his posse to visit our sanctuary city. They appeared at the Chicago DRO [Detention and Removal Operations] Office inquiring about the Secure Community initiative. One ***-******* ICE lawyer who was part of Morton's entourage told the agents they were "NOT" to lodge ICE detainers on [arrest and detain] illegal aliens despite the crime UNTIL they were actually convicted."

Can you imagine this? An illegal alien commits a rape, and instead of placing an ICE hold on this alien, while commencing the deportation process, this illegal alien is allowed out and released on bond posted.  Do you think he'll ever come back and show for his appearance?  Ha!  He will NEVER be seen again. 

The agents were shocked. They "ICE chief Morton's people" stated this is coming directly from Obama.  Do you think they showed up in Chicago for nothing - his home town?  The agents were all too shocked and scared of reprisal.  So no one said a thing.  There were many people present who witnessed the whole thing.  They - the agents - felt intimidated by the Moron and his staff and were worried for their careers if they asked questions.  But they were "instructed" not to detain/lodge ICE detainers on illegal aliens, regardless of the violent and serious nature of the crime until they are convicted.  This is ridiculous. 

Debbie, I have playing this illegal game now for many years - decades. It is IMPOSSIBLE to track aliens and monitor them for criminal convictions, once we release them out into the public. My case load is HUNDREDS of illegal aliens. HUNDREDS. How in the world can I wait for a conviction, when it is so much easier (not to mention they are tracked in detention) to lodge an immediate detainer upon arrest of the illegal alien. 

This is being done by Obama so this country is brought down and America is turned into a Third World country, saturated with illegals.  America will be Mexico #2 soon, if we do not reverse the flood of illegals.  There is no question that Barack Obama wants to bring this country down.
We have lost America, Debbie.

Here are the appropriate parts of the memo:

From: ICE-Broadcast
Sent: Wed Jun 09 15:00:20 2010
Subject: A Message from Assistant Secretary Morton
A Message from Assistant Secretary Morton
To all ICE employees
June 9, 2010 

Internal Realignment of ICE Offices 

When I arrived last year as the Assistant Secretary, one of my priorities was to improve the management structure of ICE and to give the agency a clearer sense of identity and focus. Of particular concern to me was that the agency's core operational and management functions were divided among many different offices without a clear reporting structure. 

After thoroughly reviewing our agency's leadership and reporting structure, I have determined that ICE will be able to better fulfill its mission if its offices are aligned around its two core operational responsibilities - criminal investigation and civil immigration enforcement supported by a robust management program. Therefore, I am pleased to announce that ICE will now operate through three new directorates - Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), and Management and Administration.  A revised organizational chart is attached. . . . 

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO):  ERO will align the existing offices in ICE that are primarily devoted to civil immigration enforcement, namely the Office of Detention and Removal Operations and the Secure Communities program.  This directorate will ensure a coherent and consistent approach to civil immigration enforcement in a manner that prioritizes convicted criminals, fugitives and illegal re-entrants, and recent border violators. The directorate will also oversee the agency's detention system, removal flight operations, and efforts to locate aliens subject to criminal prosecution for illegal re-entry.  James Chaparro will serve as ERO Executive Associate Director.

Um, how can you have "secure communities" or any "coherent and consistent approach" if you don't detain illegal aliens - especially VIOLENT CRIMINAL illegal aliens - when you catch them and merely release them to roam free in the great American abyss? Helloooo . . . .?


I was extremely critical of ICE under incompetent Bush appointee Julie L. Myers a/k/a "The ICE Princess."  But while things were incredibly bad under her um, - leadership,  they're even worse now under Obama's Morton, who spends much of his time taking advantage of government paid chauffeurs and bodyguards and spending your tax money feting open anti-Semites.  Not only did he keep the most incompetent and unworthy Republican/Bush/Myers people on, but he added many more incompetents who are even worse.
Say good-bye to America as we know it.  The inmates - the illegal aliens - are running the asylum.  And their leader is John Morton, brought to you by Barack Obama.

Attention, Illegal Aliens:  this is your time to invade America and roam free.  Your time to wreak havoc on our nation.

---