Abortion and "The Big Lie" Propaganda

"The great masses of the people... will more easily fall victims to a great lie than to a small one." Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

Recent "Big Lie" propaganda:

Notice the repititous political "Big Lie" mantra parroted by abortion apologist$:

"..the so-called "partial-birth abortion is a political concoction" (Linda Robayo, Center for Reproductive Law & Policy, NY Jul02);" "partial-birth abortion is not a medical procedure" "Partial-birth abortion, of course, is not a recognized medical procedure but is an inflammatory term invented by abortion opponents to provoke legislators and the public." - Angela Colaiuta, ACLU, National Field Organizer, DT: July 16, 2002"; "intact dilation and extraction - is not a medical procedure." [..what is it then?, ..do non-doctors kill the babies?]

An American/Canadian "pro-death" organization ( who euphamistically calls abortionist$ "providers"), The 'National Abortion Federation' (NAF, The Voice of Abortion Providers [the web site pictures young, teen & minority women]) spokeswoman, Vicki Saporta, euphamistically calls their members' deeds [baby killing] as "providing reproductive health activities" & claims that exposing abortionists and their customers to public scrutiny is a violation of their 'civil rights.' [..protect the right to get the monie$, never mind the baby's rights] during an 30Ap02, TechTV.com Cybercrime TV show, sub-titled "CyberCrime: Exploring the Dark Side of Technology", [bias?] entitled " The Other Holy War - Religious extremists have terrorized abortion providers for years, and now the war is moving online. We investigate abortion clinic cameras (1st aired: Tuesday, 4/30 at 9 p.m. Eastern on 'CyberCrime.' repeated may times since April, e.g. replayed 3pm, Eastern, 10Aug02)

Note the euphamisms: religious, militant, extremists, war, terrorists, Providers assassinated by anti-abortion activists, stirring up violence online, an online army under free speech protection [remember free-speech in the eyes of pro-death abortion apologist$ is reserved for a privileged monied elite], increasingly militant, and they all claim the protection of the First Amendment.. [why does 'pro-death' avoid talking about their baby killing?]

...continued: "I think his [Horsely] websites constitute threats and they are in fact a violation of laws that exist," Vicki Saporta, executive director of the National Abortion Federation, told "CyberCrime." "And [they] shouldn't be allowed to be up on the Internet."

..In 2000, the abortion rights organization [note PPFA is called an organization, neither terrorist nor extremist] Planned Parenthood, along with several doctors, sued..[$, money]..an appeals court later vacated the decision on the grounds that Horsely and other webmasters are exercising their right to free speech. Planned Parenthood has appealed that decision. [of course, $].. Scare tactics such as these abound on the Web. Saporta insists that whether the sites remain protected or not, they will not succeed. "The sites really are not working," she [Saporta] said. "Our member providers continue to offer women reproductive health care services because they know what they're doing protects women's health and saves women's lives, and they refuse to be threatened or terrorized out of providing those services to women." [without reference to profiteering & killing inside the death mill$], the author: "Scare tactics such as these abound on the Web." [emphasis added, rfh]

Abortion: America's Holocaust
http://www.773.com