o'who? - Did Pelosi Know Obama Ineligible to Be President

From: Conservative News Alerts  Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009

"A political national committee [the Democratic National Committee], the Chair of the Party convention [Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi], the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens."- J.B. Williams, CanadaFreePress.com

The mere fact that Barack Hussein Obama assumed the presidency... without ever producing a valid birth certificate to establish his eligibility, may just be the tip of the iceberg.

That's because Williams implies that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and high-ranking officials at the DNC may also have doubts as to whether Barack Hussein Obama is eligible, under the Constitution, to be President of the United States.

     And that's not really all that shocking when you consider that polls indicate that as many as 100 million-plus Americans have concerns over the fact that Barack Hussein Obama has refused to produce a valid birth certificate, a document that could prove that he is eligible, under the Constitution, to hold the office of President of the United States.

     So how can the MSM ridicule and ignore such a large segment of the population of the United States and get away with it?

     On a profoundly important issue like Obama's eligibility, we need to get across a fundamental point to his media minions: If this guy is truly constitutionally eligible to be president, it would take him about ten minutes – and ten bucks payable to the State of Hawaii – to prove it.

     So why does Obama resolutely refuse to make that phone call... or spend the pocket change... he apparently has no issue spending as much as 1.5 million thwarting the efforts of those who are trying to compel him to produce his actual birth certificate? If he has nothing to hide, where's his often-promised "transparency?"

     And when CNN's Lou Dobbs meekly suggested the birth certificate question might deserve inquiry, the left unleashed a major campaign to have him terminated... a lot of trouble to go to for a "conspiracy theory."

     Think about it: unlike Obama, John McCain offered indisputable proof of his eligibility for the nation's highest office. Is the reason Obama hasn't provided such evidence because he doesn't have it?

     What other explanation is there for his driving our country down the road to political chaos?

     Let's face it, so-called journalists have failed the American people when it comes to giving us the information necessary to make an informed decision as to whether "President Obama" is really "Impostor Obama."

     And for that failure, they must be held to account. The fact of the matter is the American people no longer want, or require, their services.  We're turning them off... we're tuning them out... and yet, in spite of sagging ratings and rapidly declining circulation rates, they just don't seem to be getting the message.

     So let's send them the jolt they need... something that will make the feelings of the American people as apparent as a two-by-four across the back of the head.... let's send them a wake up call... let's "pink slip" them.
If Barack Obama Is Involved In Unsavory Dealings, Can Nancy Pelosi Be Far Behind?

     Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states: "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

     But for any real examination as to whether Obama fulfills that requirement, the American people are forced to turn to the foreign media... most recently... to J. B. Williams' blockbuster three-part series in CanadaFreePress.com.

     Williams reveals a scary fact: national and state political parties are responsible for vetting and certifying their own candidates' eligibility for the presidency and vice-presidency.

     And in Obama's case the final vetting authority rested with  none other than Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi... she was Chair of the Democratic National Convention . . . and thus the main signatory of the Democratic National Committee's "Official Certification of Nomination" for transmission to the state parties and election commissions.

     In other words, it was Pelosi who signed the document that claims Obama was properly vetted.

     Actually, Pelosi, signed two documents.  The first stated: "This is to certify that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

     But that wasn't the signed and notarized document Nancy Pelosi sent to the election officials of all 50 states.

     According to Williams, Pelosi and the DNC only sent that first document to one state – Hawaii. 

     Pelosi sent the other 49 states another document altogether... also signed and notarized on the same day as the first... almost identical to the first document except that it omitted some key words in the "Official Certification" that only Hawaii received. Guess which words?

     You guessed it. The omitted words were all those after the word "respectively."  That is, Pelosi left out the following: "and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

     And one can only ask... Why?

     House Minority Leader, John Boehner, the main signatory on the Republicans' "Official Certification of Nomination" sent the same document to Hawaii – and the other 49 states. It said, truthfully, that John McCain (and Sarah Palin) were constitutionally eligible for the nation's two highest offices.

     It would appear that Williams has discovered more smoking guns than you'd find in a 1950s-era Hollywood Western.

     Here's how Williams summarizes his findings:  "A political national committee [the DNC], the Chair of the Party convention [Pelosi], the Secretary of the Party [another signatory], Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many more [people], have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens."

     And Williams, unlike the MSM, doesn't mince words: "some form of a conspiracy to mislead and ultimately defraud voters took place at the top of the Democrat Party." And Williams adds: "Nancy Pelosi knew that she was signing a false statement on behalf of Obama." 

     However, anyone who's ever heard NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN or MSNBC talk about Pelosi and the bogus "Official Certification of Nomination" clearly has been having hallucinations. They've never mentioned the subject.

     And it is our right and duty to chastise key figures in the print and electronic media for missing – or ignoring – a story of such monumental importance to our country.
Eight Fateful Questions For Obama, Pelosi, The MSM... And Us.

     Obama and those around him smirk and shrug their shoulders in response to honest inquiries about Obama's eligibility... effectively they say:  No comment, now or ever.

     In his CanadaFreePress.com series, Williams lists eight fateful questions for Obama, Pelosi, the MSM, and each and every one of us:

1. Why did the DNC certify Obama's [constitutional] eligibility only in Hawaii?
2. Why did no state DNC office, DNC elector, or Election Commission office catch it?
3. Since the DNC made no such certification, on what basis do we assume Obama to be eligible?
4. Without any such certification, isn't it more important than ever to see the actual birth certificate and ask the courts to make an official ruling on the definition of "natural born citizen?"
5. Why did the DNC use TWO different certification documents, one incomplete, when the RNC used the same complete document nationwide?
6. On what basis will the media continue to claim that Obama is eligible?
7. Why did Nancy Pelosi show signs of stress in her [signature on] Hawaii certification of Obama?
8. When will every American demand answers to these and many more questions?

     These are all vital questions that deserve answers, but ones where answers are hard to come by.  Of course, it's too late in the game to expect Obama and Pelosi to start leveling with the American people.

     And despite the growth in numbers and skill of the alternative media, the grossly uninformed in our country still define stories ignored by the traditional media (the big newspapers and the major networks) as things that never happened.

     Let us not forget, Dan Rather's staff at CBS relied on obviously forged documents to advance false allegations against President George W. Bush.

     The documents Williams presents are real... the only question that is not being asked by the MSM is... why were there two separate documents and why was the document which stated "and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution" not filed in 49 states?

     There might be a very reasonable answer... but what is alarming is that no one, other than Williams, is asking the question... and Pelosi's people are stone-walling Williams. If there's a reasonable answer... why not simply supply it?

     That's why we need to demand that editors and producers, if they want to stay in business, start covering this major story... the American people deserve an answer to the question; did a president and high-level Democratic party officials knowingly put an imposter... a fraud... a usurper... into the highest office in the land.

     And when we barrage them with pink slips, they'll get the message loud-and-clear.

On Obama's Eligibility, The MSM Has Gone to the Dogs.

     There are two major reasons why the MSM is ignoring a story that's probably bigger than Watergate: (1) its mindless, reflexive liberalism leads it to "protect" Barack Hussein Obama and; (2) its descent into trivialities and "entertainment journalism."

     Typically, we focus on the first reason... the liberalism... but let's explore the second reason for a change of pace... the obsession with trivialities.

     A good way to determine what the MSM is up to on an issue is to use "Google."

     What we find there would be almost comical... if the issue of Obama's eligibility to hold office wasn't so crucial to our nation's constitutional integrity and political future.

     Example: try doing a Google search of the "New York Times," plus "Obama," plus "birth certificate," and Google will show you a healthy number of results.

     But if you were to do a search of the terms "New York Times," "Obama," and "Dog" you would pull roughly 16 times as many mentions... 2.3 million to be precise.

     The content of the dog stories is revealed by the five items at the top of the Google list, including:

          "Does Bo Know He's the President's Dog?" (Answer. No);
          "Obama Dog Watch Update";
          "The Search for the First Puppy"' and, drum roll;
          "The First Dog Has Arrived."

     And last but not least, "Obama Girls Name Their Dog after Joe Biden's son." Actually, the son's name is "Beau," not "Bo," but what's a little matter of accuracy for the Times?

     As the dog obsession shows, the MSM increasingly wallows in trivialities.  There's less and less space for real news – and almost no time for a major constitutional issue like Obama's refusal to show that he is, in fact, eligibility to be  President of the United States.

     As the MSM has immersed itself in trivialities, it has itself become trivial – almost unreadable and unwatchable. While the alternative media flourish, fewer and fewer people read the Times or watch the CBS News.

     The bigger a story, the less coverage the MSM thinks it merits.  Still doubt that? Then check out Google once again, this time plugging in "Pelosi" plus "Official Certification of Nomination" plus "New York Times," and you'll hardly see anything at all.  The story of the century and not a word from the MSM.

     Frankly, we need to let the MSM big shots know that the American people are willing to act and take back our country.

Floyd Brown, Western Center for Journalism

P.S. Even if you can not join us in this effort right now, you can still help us expose Barack Hussein Obama by sending this e-mail to at least 10 of your friends.

The Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.

Western Center for Journalism, 4109 Bridgeport Way W Suite E-2 – University Place, Washington 98466 – (202) 370-6366

---