2nd Amendment - Previous Aurora shooting: Gun was in the right hands.

article source: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/12175-two-aurora-shootings-one-widely-known-the-other-ignored

Gun was in right hands in previous Aurora shooting

by: Bob Adelmann, The New American, Saturday, July 21, 2012

     On April 22 of this year a convicted felon, just out of jail, went to an Aurora, Colorado, church and shot and killed a member of the congregation before being killed himself by a congregant carrying a gun.  On July 20, following the horrific shooting at a movie theater in Aurora, President Obama offered his condolences to the victims of the more recent tragedy.  No doubt the president was unaware of the earlier shooting, which produced only one victim, thanks to the quick thinking and action of a responsibly armed individual.

Read the full article and Comment: http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/12175-two-aurora-shootings-one-widely-known-the-other-ignored

---

sign of the times - Concealed Weapons, Spotting and Profiling (by David Morris, We.8Feb12)

From: Absolute Rights Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 Subject: How to spot your enemy
Spotting Concealed Weapons and Profiling

by David Morris
article source: http://AbsoluteRights.com, Issue #17, Wednesday, February 8th, 2012
     Staying alert includes being able to spot a person who is or may be carrying a concealed weapon.

     As you observe people there are certain things you should be looking for that may indicate the presence of a weapon.

     For example: As a person walks, only one of his arms swings. His coat is left open in cold weather. A shirt is buttoned only at the top and the tail is hanging loose over his waistband. A person sees you, looks down toward his hip, then avoids eye contact.

     According to Robert Gallagher, a former NYPD detec tive who studied over 1,000 arrests by New York City cops, people who try to conceal guns develop special behavioral characteristics.

     Some of these traits are now taught to the U.S. Secret Service agents for crowd assessment during presidential and dignitary protection assignments.

     According to Sgt. Robert Stash, a gang specialist with Chicago PD, most people are right-handed and when they greet other people they use their right hands.

     Let's say you see a bunch of gangbangers hanging around and someone walks up and greets them using his left hand. It could signal the presence of a weapon.

     People who hide an illegal gun in their pocket tend to hold on to it to prevent its outline showing through the clothing. Someone with a gun in his waistband tends to keep a hand in the nearest pocket to hold the gun and keep it from falling below the waistband.

     People who carry an illegal handgun tend not to use a holster. If they have to drop the gun and run, they don't want to be caught with and have to explain an empty holster.

COMMON METHODS OF CARRY INCLUDE:

• A right-front pocket or the appendix area of the waist-band. Over 80% of armed suspects carry their guns in this location, according to Gallagher.
• A right-rear pocket or the waistband between the right hip and the small of the back.
• The left hip waistband (cross-draw position) is the least popular.

     Shoulder, ankle or other exotic holsters are seldom used by street gangsters.
     When looking for concealed weapons, look for things that don't look right.

     Look for a jacket that doesn't hang naturally. An uneven hemline may indicate the presence of a gun in the coat pocket. When an armed person moves, the heavy object will swing. Being aware of this, a subject may hold on to the hem near where the gun is to keep it steady.

     I have this problem with my SigTac coat because the holster is on the chest. A buddy of mine sews holsters into his coats under the armpit and it allows the coats to hang evenly, even when un zipped.

     Look for a mode of dress inconsistent with the weather - a coat, jacket or vest on a hot day. Or a coat left open on a cold, windy day may provide quick ac cess to a gun.

     A shirt draped over dress slacks may offer conceal ment to a handgun. Unnatural bulges, a jacket carried over the arm, a hat being carried instead of worn, all suggest the possibility of a weapon.

     Body language signals to watch for:

     We tend to use our elbow or forearm to press, touch or make contact with the weapon to confirm its presence.

     We tend to hold a pocket where the gun is from the outside. We tend to pull up pants or adjust our clothing repeatedly to counteract the weight of a gun and its effects on clothing.

     A gun strapped to an ankle or stuffed in a boot may cause the person to favor that leg so as not to jostle the gun more than necessary. When we walk, we may allow the non-gun arm to swing naturally and restrain the other arm to steady the gun or hide any tell-tale bulge.

     We may walk with our gun arm held away from the body, to avoid banging into the gun and possibly dislodging it.

     If you carry weapons, you'll pick up some tells just because you're being hyper-critical of yourself.

     Personally, I find that I pull down or even out my shirt tails when I get out of my car to make sure that my in-waist-band hol ster is covered.

     I am also careful to only reach up to high shelves with my left hand and to bend down at the knees instead of at the waist so that the butt of my firearm doesn't print on my shirt.

     Another tell that I have is that when it's really windy and I'm wearing a shirt that flaps too much in the wind, I find that I hold my arm somewhat awkwardly to keep my firearm from showing.

     When I'm carrying in a compression shirt holster, with my firearm under my armpit, I find that I push my arm out from my body to move it back wards.

     With knives, if I don't see a clip sticking out of a pocket, I look for worn pocket corners and a tell tale bulge in the pocket.

     Since I am a big fan of neck knives, I look for cord age or non-decorative chain around the neck.

Don't be afraid to profile.

     Profiling isn't foolproof, but it does tip the odds in your favor. A few things to look for:

Face, neck, and hand tattoos.
       Especially tear drops or "mean" looking tattoos. Keep in mind that they're permanent, so the tat toos could be a reminder from a former lifestyle. I have known several very gentle men through the years who still have gang and prison tats from their younger years.
 "I'm .. Bad." look and swagger.
       Oftentimes it's a false front, but it can also be a tool to get psyched up.
 Red or blue bandana.
       Specifically on the head, on the arm, or hanging out of a waist band or pocket. Keep in mind that bandanas are great survival tools and lots of people carry them.
 Age, sex, and dress.
       The fact is that most violent criminals are young males who dress like street thugs. It's important to note that after the collapse of the peso in Argentina, middle aged muggers regularly dressed in suits and hit targets in the banking & business districts.
"Aware" vs. "Unaware."
       Criminals, law enforcement, military, and preppers all have the trait of being more aware of what's going on around them than the average person. If you spot someone who is obviously aware of what's going on around them, there's a pretty good chance that they're either a potential ally or potential enemy and worth further exami nation.
Response to authority.
       When uniformed law enforcement enters a crowd ed room, try to look at the facial expressions of others in the room. You'll quickly notice what a polarizing effect they have.
 Counter-profiling.
       One of the things that I try to do is appear as if I'm not as aware as I actually am so that people won't profile me as being switched on. If I am with other people and can sit facing a wall that has a mirror on it, I will. I use my peripheral vision to profile people. I smile a lot and try not to look serious. I try to wear clothes that are more hiking/camping rather than tactical.
       And then there are certain facial expressions to be aware of.
       Bad guys with guns and bad intentions often avoid eye con tact until they are ready to strike. They believe that by avoiding eye contact you will be less likely to pay any attention to them. They also believe that by avoiding eye contact you will be less likely to identify them at a later time.
       Bad guys planning their attack may tend to sneak a quick glance at you, and then look away. They want to know if you've noticed them and are showing any signs of heightened awareness.
       The bottom line is this: You should assume everyone you come in contact with is armed until you're satis fied they are not. Anyone exhibiting any of the cues described above is considered a possible threat until you are comfortable they are not.
       This doesn't mean you need to be paranoid, worried, or that you have to give everyone a thorough examina tion to look for weapons. It just means that you accept the fact that everyone you meet may have a weapon...whether for good purposes or bad purposes.
       When someone approaches you, quickly observe their hands for weapons, their waist area for bulges or signs of concealed weapons and their body language for signs of weapons or bad intentions. If you're more than 3 feet away, you can do this with your peripheral vision without taking your eyes off of their face.
       Keep distance between you and anyone you consider suspicious. Be prepared to use cover. Know your op tions and decide in advance how you will handle any problem.
       Don't just look, observe. Watch for body language and facial cues. Bad guys usually aren't too bright and they almost always tell you in advance what they are up to, you just have to know how to read the signs.

God bless & stay safe, David Morris

---

2nd Amendment - o'behind closed doors: Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN!? Can anyone confirm she's signed?

From: lc Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010

Haven't verified, but here it is.... L.C.

Please take a moment to read the entire article, including the Reuter's linked article. While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN. 


OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE WAR


On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States


On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before Naive US citizens even understand what has happened.


Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?


What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present! 


THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.


As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here:


Click on the link below for further acknowledgement…..

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

article reposted below from the above Reuters news report: 

"U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade"

(Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."

"Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.

While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.

"The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.

However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."

"Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.

The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.

Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.

Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.

The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.

Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.

The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.

The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.

A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by several nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.

(Editing by Eric Beech)

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.  This is a very serious matter! Silence will lead us to Socialism!!!  [Which may be upon us already! - rfh]

---

Big Brother - WH & HS monitoring Internet comments & posts

From: CCRKBA  Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010  Subject: STOP Obama-Napolitano Gun Harassment - Activate All Gun Owners NOW!

Alert: ABC News is reporting that Obama's Department of Homeland Security is monitoring the comments and posts of conservative Americans and gun owners on web sites and within social networks like Facebook and Twitter.

---

added by rfh --
sources: 

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/olympics-feds-reading-tweets/story?id=9825070 

http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/2010/02/13/dhs-monitoring-social-media-and-web-sites-for-terror-info/

During the Olympics, The Feds Will Be Reading Your Tweets -- And the Blotter

DHS Is Monitoring Social Media and Web Sites for Terror and Disaster Info

By JASON RYAN
Feb. 13, 2010

As the winter Olympics begin, the Department of Homeland Security has disclosed that it will be monitoring the comments and posts on websites and social media like Twitter for information on possible terror threats. Among the sites listed in a privacy impact statement filed Friday afternoon by DHS are the Drudge Report, the Huffington Post, Twitter, Google and this web site, the Blotter.

The National Operations Center of DHS will watch the web for information, according to the statement, to "provide situational awareness" in the event of natural disaster, an "act of terrorism, or other manmade disaster."

"The Olympics are a potential target for such events," said the statement. The statement did not list all web sites and social media that the NOC will monitor, but provided 31 examples, many of them, like the Blotter, sites that cover breaking news, security, or terror.

DHS officials say they will not be monitoring the web sites extensively, but would use the sites as a reference and open source tool in the event of an incident or emergency. DHS officials also used the monitoring of social media sites in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake to aid rescue efforts.

In one instance a DHS employee noticed a message on a web site about a person trapped under rubble in Port-au-Prince and was able to direct a State Department team to help in the rescue.

One official told ABC News that monitoring the web sites during an emergency is like watching "a canary in a coal mine," since social media sites can have real-time information. The official said the raw information that is available on the sites can help first responders and law enforcement officials make quick assessments to help in their response to events.

And, sources:

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS291US317&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=newsaxon.org+"the+sniper"

http://www.newser.com/article/d9dvgboo0/ky-man-charged-with-threatening-president-by-posting-sniper-poem-on-supremacist-web-site.html

Man Charged With Threatening Obama in Web Poem

KENTUCKY'S SPENCER POSTED 'THE SNIPER' ON WHITE SUPREMACIST SITE

(AP) A Kentucky man has been arrested and charged with posting a poem [in 2007] threatening President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama on a white supremacist website.  The Secret Service said Johnny Logan Spencer Jr. of Louisville wrote and posted the poem, titled "The Sniper," on a site called NewSaxon.org.

A special agent said the poem describes a gunman shooting and killing a "tyrant," later identified as the president.  Spencer is scheduled to appear before a judge today for a detention hearing.  He's in federal custody charged with making threats against the president and threatening to kill or injure a major candidate for the office of the president.

---

Obama You Can Keep the "Change."   I Support the Second Amendment.

This raises very serious concerns.  This is America NOT Iran!

The Department of Homeland Security, led by leftist anti-gun rights Secretary Janet Napolitano, has a history of trying to suppress gun owners and conservative opponents of the President.

This latest news with the admission that the Obama Administration is monitoring the comments of Americans should raise concerns about big brother and the security and privacy of individual Americans.

We need to be absolutely sure that the political views of Americans - especially gun owners and those with conservative views critical of the President - are not being monitored for political suppression.

We need to stop this travesty now. We need confidence that gun owners and conservative Americans are not being monitored because of their opinions.

Last year you may remember the uproar over an official DHS report that Napolitano requested.

It was a formal Federal Government paid report titled: "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment."

In this report, Obama's Department of Homeland Security said among other things: Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements ... and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to gun control or illegal immigration.

First Obama's federal department sought to tie the word and emotion of "hate" to those who favor state's rights - in essence the form of democracy created by our founding fathers. Secondly, it sought to label as dangerous those who oppose gun control or who favor a crackdown on illegal immigration.

But there is more...

Obama and Napolitano's official report also said: "Rightwing extremists are harnessing this historical election (Obama's election as President) as a recruitment tool.   Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship ... and restrictions on firearms ownership and use.   Rightwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns and leverage them as drivers for recruitment."

So, if you believe in the Second Amendment to the constitution or if you disagree with Obama's policies - you too can be dangerous according to Janet Napolitano and Obama's Department of Homeland Security.

The Obama administration thinks that gun owners and conservatives are more dangerous than terrorists, Napolitano's Department is admitting they are monitoring websites and social media feeds for "increased security."

In light of her past actions it makes one wonder what they are monitoring.

Political suppression MUST Be Stopped.

When Napolitano's report came to light last year it was also revealed that it included passages saying the American government should be afraid of returning troops coming back from war.

In effect her report said we should be afraid of veterans. It said, "rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat."

Americans should be afraid of our brave men and women returning from combat who could turn on us. That is what Napolitano's report said.

CNN reported that s a result the American Legion's national commander, David K. Rehbein, said in a letter to Napolitano that, "I think it is important for all of us to remember that Americans are not the enemy.  The terrorists are."

Her response was to say "I know that some veterans groups were offended by the fact that veterans were mentioned in this assessment, so I apologize for that offense. It was certainly not intended."

However, this apology did not include an apology to the millions of gun owners and conservative American's who did not vote for Obama, who do not support his policies and who are not radical but average, concerned Americans - the same Americans who have attended gun shows, Tea Party protests, events like our Gun Rights Policy Conference or who have supported the NRA.

Now we find out that she and her Department are monitoring website posts and other online social media networks. 

Do you remember last summer when the White House attempted to track emails?

The Dallas Morning News had reported the Obama White House government official website called for supporters to track "disinformation" from opponents.  [ flag@whitehouse.gov ] 

Another report from the Syracuse Post-Standard newspaper noted the White House told their supporters "If you get an email that seems fishy, send it."  They then provided a special email address just to track opponents. [ flag@whitehouse.gov ] 

The Obama White House has a history of trying to track and suppress political dissent and has a history of using official government resources to track opponents.

They paid for reports critical of veterans, gun owners and those with conservative political views. They created a program to track messages and email addresses of those opposed to government run health care.  Now the administration - the same Department led by Napplitano that issued the anti-conservatives report is admitting to monitoring website posts and social networks.

It is important to ensure this data is not used for political attempts to track opponents.

I think it is important for freedom loving Americans to have a comfort level that the White House will not use official government information to track the views of conservatives and gun owners.

Political suppression MUST Be Stopped.

Together we can help preserve both the First Amendment freedom of speech and the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Keep calling your Senators today, toll free numbers include 1-877-851-6437 and 1-866-220-0044, or call toll 1-202-225-3121 AND REGISTER YOU'RE OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to monitor Americans!

CALL PRESIDENT Obama, 202-456-1111 and 202-456-1414 expressing your disdain and ABSOLUTE REJECTION of all GUN BANS.

DO NOT BE SILENCED - MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!

Thank you. I know I can count on you.

Sincerely,
Alan Gottlieb, Chairman, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA)

P.S. I hope that you are as appalled as I am to find out that Obama's official Department of Homeland Security is monitoring website posts, Twitter and Facebook. We need to ensure they are not tracking gun owners and political opponents.

Select Here to:  STOP THE MONITORING OF GUN OWNERS AND CONSERVATIVES:  SEND YOUR FAXES TO CONGRESS NOW!
If you prefer to donate by check, please mail to: The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, 12500 NE Tenth Place, Dept Code 3650, Bellevue, Washington 98005

NOTE: We need TENS OF THOUSANDS of faxes and PHONE CALLS and EMAILS delivered to ALL Congressmen right away! For our projects to be successful, we must count on the voluntary financial support from individuals like you who care. Your contribution of $20 or $25 is urgently needed today. Your donation for just $10 will help so much. If you can afford to send $50 or $100 or more it would truly be a godsend. Remember, protecting our freedom is not inexpensive. But then, it's impossible to put a price tag on freedom.  Together, we can preserve the Constitutional rights our Founding Fathers intended our people to have forever. For more information about CCRKBA go to http://www.ccrkba.org/

With more than 650,000 members and supporters nationwide, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is one of the nation's premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, the Citizens Committee is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States. Contributions are not tax deductible. The Citizens Committee can be reached by phone at (425) 454-4911, on the Internet at www.ccrkba.org or by email to InformationRequest@ccrkba.org


related (dated) http://harrold.org/rfhextra/privacy.html 

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books	History Links	Quotations: American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution + more Amendments

2nd Amendment - Concealed Carry: HB-95 & HB-113, One small step for Wyoming

From: Dudley Brown Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 Subject: One small step for Wyoming

One small step for Wyoming, one giant leap for gun rights

Wyoming is on the verge of passing two key pieces of gun rights legislation.

HB-95, The Wyoming Firearms Freedom Act, and HB-113 "Alaska-style" permit-less concealed carry, are facing an up-or-down vote before the Wyoming State House of Representatives.

On Tuesday, National Association for Gun Rights Director of Operations Luke O'Dell was on hand to testify before the Wyoming State House Judiciary Committee on behalf of both HB-95, the Wyoming Firearms Freedom Act, and the HB-113, "Alaska-style" permit less carry.

You may be asking yourself, "Why do I care, I don't live in Wyoming?"

It's simple: The higher the bar is set, the more pro-gun pieces of legislation pass across the country, the stronger the gun rights movement gets.

Passage of permit-less "Alaska-style" concealed carry in Wyoming would be a huge step forward toward true firearms freedom.   Only in Alaska and Vermont can law-abiding citizens carry concealed firearms for their own protection without getting Big Brother's approval.  Should Wyoming join their ranks, the right-to-carry will have taken a major step forward.

Additionally, Wyoming's Firearms Freedom Act was written with much stronger language than similar legislation in other states.  Wyoming's bill included penalties for state law enforcement enforcing Federal laws which contradict Wyoming state law.

I'm happy to say that Wyoming Gun Owners, a partner of ours, has been leading the charge for both pieces of legislation.

Now it's our turn to help out.

If you live in Wyoming, or know someone who does, please have them contact their Wyoming legislator and tell them to vote "Yes" on HB-95 and HB-113.

You can find contact information for Wyoming State Legislators here.

If you're not from Wyoming, go ahead and drop them a line anyways. Tell them that you support their efforts to advance freedom in Wyoming.

And if you'd like to help Wyoming Gun Owners pass this legislation by making a donation, click here.
For Liberty, Dudley Brown, Executive Director, National Association for Gun Rights

---

To help the National Association for Gun Rights grow, please forward this to a friend.
To view this as a web page, please click this link: view online.
Help fight gun control. Donate to the National Association for Gun Rights!

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books	History Links	Quotations: American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution + more Amendments