Green Brit's Cover Up Climategate Scandal: Global Warming Mass Hysteria Continues In Green Science Community
ALERT: Surprise, surprise the British House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee said that they'd seen no evidence to support charges revealed by hackers that British researchers had tampered with data or perverted the peer review process exaggerating the threat of global warming.
Read the email evidence written by British Green Sclientists for yourself:
Data Manipulation (Excerpts of Emails)DEMAND A CLIMATEGATE INVESTIGATION"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline"
FAX Obama And All 100 Senators - Investigate Climate Fraud Now!
The committee also said that, as far as it was able to ascertain, that nothing in the more than 1,000 hidden e-mails published ahead of Copenhagen, challenged the mass hysteria of green sclientists continuing to ignore scientific data and saying that "global warming is happening and that it is induced by human activity."
The Scientific Community Must Apologize for Lying About Global Warming!
I never thought I would utter these words - THANK YOU HACKERS!
Again read the hidden email evidence written by British sclientists. It is clear.
Suppression of evidence: (Excerpts of Emails)"Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise. He's not in at the moment...Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same?...We will be getting Caspar to do likewise."
Most Reprehensible - How to squeeze dissenting science out of the peer review process: (Excerpts of Emails)"This was the danger of always criticizing the skeptics for not publishing in the "peer-reviewed literature". Obviously, they found a solution to that-take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering "Climate Research" as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board...What do others think?"
"I will be emailing the journal to tell them I'm having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor." "It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I've had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice!"What is CLIMATEGATE?
Don't feel ashamed if you have not heard of ClimateGate. It is the most underreported blockbuster news story of Global Warming.
ClimateGate was uncovered when computer hackers managed to access the server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia, England. Emails between some of the leading scientists were then posted online. Those emails contain what skeptics of the theory of global warming say is the proof that much of the data has been manipulated to attempt to convince governments to act on the issue of climate change.
What was in those emails they were trying to cover up?
Undeniable proof that the world leading scientific authority on Global Warming LIED! The so-called sclientists at the at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia intentionally manipulated, suppressed and flat out lied about the climate data in an attempt to prove Global Warming was a real threat to the planet.
"Climate Change" sclientists Consider Lies As Primary Proof
Your tax dollars are funding "government research" for "climate change." That so-called "research" has been proven to be manipulated and falsified in order to squash facts and ban authentic research that refutes many of the "climate change" claims made by numerous government appointed sclientists and institutions. There is little to no evidence that "climate change" even exists. It is outrageous that our tax dollars are being spent researching a "science" that considers lies its primary proof.
Leading Climategate scientific spin-doctors have so far had to take little to no responsibility for their actions. Dr. Phil Jones of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit has stepped aside but not been let go. Jones admitted to "having trouble keeping research records" and later admitted he knew "climate change" was a farce. Dr. Michael Mann of Penn State is currently under investigation by his university. Mann fabricated climate change data and urged other researchers to delete possibly incriminating emails. Keep in mind these two men still have their jobs.
Making fraudulent scientific claims violates the primary ethics of the scientific community and taxpayer-funded research. But most importantly, these acts are possible research tempering and CIVIL AND FEDERAL CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS. Those responsible must be held accountable. They lied and altered data to indoctrinate America into believing in a false science. The men and women responsible for Climategate must be given the same consequences every other American citizen would face if they were in question of possibly committing civil and or federal crimes.
No one should be held above the law: especially those involved in Climategate:
DEMAND ANSWERS TO THE LIES AND MANIPULATIONS OF CLIMATEGATE
Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) is urging the Obama Administration to investigate Climategate and the confessions made by editors of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. The ICPP claimed in 2007 that the glaciers in the Himalayas are melting faster than any other glacial mass. This claim was made with no scientific study; instead it included a reference to an article written by The World Wildlife Federation, an organization that fervently supports and promotes the false science of "climate change." To make matters worse, the math they used to calculate the melting of the glaciers in the Himalayas was incorrect. In essence the IPCC used faulty mathematical equations to come up with their fake conclusion and did not even bother to do something the rest of the scientific community is quite familiar with, a scientific study.
STOP SPENDING YOUR TAX DOLLARS ON DOCTORED SCIENCE.
All Senator Inhofe wants is simple: an investigation into why and how those entangled in Climategate were allowed to fabricate research and if their false claims warrant civil and criminal penalties. So far, the Democrats have blocked all efforts from Senator Inhofe to investigate "climate change." It is disturbing that Senator Inhofe's pursuit of truth and just consequences is being blatantly ignored and disregarded by the Left.
For years sclientists that were Global Warming Skeptics were ridiculed, laughed at, scoffed at and smeared in the media and scientific community. How dare someone label Global Warming as anything but scientific fact? Of course anyone who questions Global Warming must be an Earth-Hater.
Turns out...They were right to be skeptical. Truth is they were not skeptical enough. The skeptics questioned the science - they should have also questioned the sclientists.
The scientific community has been profiting from huge grants and growing political power by propagating the fear of human extinction because of the global warming myth. And the political power scientists are gaining over our government is truly horrifying! Nobody elected them, but scientists' demands are becoming law by Obama decrees!
The time is now, the decision is yours- please consider the facts and follow your conscience.
Sincerely, Ron Arnold, Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise www.cdfe.org
P.S. sclientists are acting like politicians, therefore we need to treat them like politicians. They need to feel the WRATH of the Grassroots.
Sclientists need be held accountable...but the media loves the Global Warming lie, and this Administration can't wait to sell our country to the World Government. Direct Grassroots pressure is the ONLY way to hold the sclientists accountable.
Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, Dept Code - 4028, 12500 NE 10th Place, Bellevue, WA 98005
The Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise is a non-partisan education and research organization which works on free enterprise studies, public policy research, book publishing, conferences, white papers, and media outreach. We are a tax-exempt educational organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the United States Tax Code. The Center was founded in 1976 and has been exempt since 1977. The Center does not seek or accept government funds. Contributions to the Center are tax deductible.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please, avoid posting advertisements. Content comments are welcomed, including anonymous. Posts with profanity will not be published.