o'who? - Alan Keyes on Eligibility Cases, Dangerous AG, American Marxism (Western Journalism, video)

From: Western Journalism Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 Subject: Video: Alan Keyes on News in Eligibility Cases

Dr. Alan Keyes Speaks About Obama's Eligibility Question (29Mar11)  and role to be played by law enforcement & military vis-à-vis o'who?'s questioned authority.  article source: http://www.westernjournalism.com/dr-alan-keyes-speaks-about-obamas-eligibility-question/) related: Oathkeepers http://oathkeepers.org/ related:  CPNLive.com & Donald Trump videos on Youtube video source: http://www.youtube.com/embed/BUTvCiNduv8 Related posts: Alan Keyes On CNN questioning Obama’s eligibility President’s lawyers say eligibility question over No vacation for Obama from eligibility question Obama Blasts Those Who Question his Eligibility, Religion Chrysler bankruptcy lawyers raise eligibility question Our Dangerous Attorney General by Human Events            Eric Holder should've never been confirmed as attorney general. Any man who would, as he did, urge President Bill Clinton to grant clemency to 16 members of the Puerto Rican domestic terrorist outfit FALN (a Spanish acronym for Armed Forces of National Liberation) was not only unfit to be America's lawyer, but he himself should have been investigated.      Yet Holder is, indeed, our attorney general, and his priorities are exactly where we'd expect them to be: dangerous.       Consider that righteous retribution against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his 9/11 cohorts remains in limbo as Holder's Justice Department continues to seek out ways to try them in civilian courts.      Moreover, Holder refuses to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, a bipartisan bill passed by Congress and signed into law by a Democratic President.      What's more, under congressional questioning, he declined even to suggest that there are radical elements within Islam that contribute to anti-Americanism and terrorist activity around the world.      Read The Full Story: America's Marxist Media by David B. Jenkins, Pajamas Media       It has by now become glaringly apparent to all but the most obtuse or thoroughly indoctrinated among us that a majority of the members of the mainstream media (I call them cockroach media, but we'll come back to that later) are socialists in outlook and practice. As Kyle-Anne Shiver wrote in an article for Pajamas Media on August 28, 2010, "We now know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that our formerly august mainstream media is replete with socialists."      Well, excuse me. Not at all to diss Kyle-Anne, who does good work, but that information has been around for a long time and has been readily available to anyone who cares to look.      In the interest of clarity, though, let's not use the word "socialists," a term that has become somewhat socially acceptable in certain quarters and to that extent masks the radicalism of their ideas. Socialists are Marxists, so let's call them what they are: Marxists.      How did the mainstream media get to be the way they are? To find the answer, let's turn to an old source.      Helen MacInnes was a Scottish-born novelist whose writing career spanned nearly four and a half decades. Most of her 21 novels dealt with the struggle against totalitarianism. During World War II, she wrote stirring novels of the fight against Nazi Germany. After the conclusion of that war, while other writers were busily plotting stories of the threat of a reincarnated Nazism, she was among the first to understand that communism, with its subversive hooks already well set in the upper levels of many governments, including ours, represented a far greater threat to human freedom. Read The Full Story: George Soros' New Plan for Global Financial Regulation by Arlen Williams, Big Government       What would you think if George Soros were organizing his fellow anti-American, globalist, neo-Marxist "thought leaders," in pursuit of globally governed banking and finance, in a second Bretton Woods conference?      Would you consider that their goals include dragging American influence and incomes down, while confiscating much of our personal finances and giving them to other nations (and yes, the age-old financier network behind them) in the name of "communitarianism?"      Would you find their goal is to replace the bad influences of the IMF and the World Bank, with a much worse, more powerfully controlling, post-American global apparatus?      What would you think, if that meeting were being held this April 8th through 11th?       I got an email, last week; it was Tuesday the 22nd. It was from George Soros. To hear as straight from the dragon's mouth as feasible, I had subscribed. In this emailed article, he lamented the inequities of wealth among the nation-states of Europe, under the strains of their continuing insolvency crisis. He warned of the dangers of national interest. Rather, he proposed, not surprisingly, a further blowing of the global insolvency bubble, so the more indebted European nations may get along owing, while their lending nations get along being owed, all the while, blending and worsening the financial and monetary crises and spreading this yeasty recipe further throughout the world, especially to America. Read The Full Story: