o'amnesty - NPR E-Verify Whoppers! (NumbersUSA.com)

From:  Roy Beck, President, NumbersUSA.com Date: Tuesday 7JUN2011
NPR's 2 FALSEHOODS ON E-VERIFY ERROR RATES THAT YOU CAN CORRECT WHEREVER YOU HEAR THEM IN THE FUTURE
      We have a blog on our website that deals with huge whoppers of falsehoods that National Public Radio recently promulgated against E-Verify.
     With two Supreme Court rulings in three weeks backing the expansion of E-Verify to drive illegal aliens out of U.S. jobs, the multi-milion-dollar pro-illegal-worker propaganda industry is in full force.
     We need you to challenge falsehoods about E-Verify wherever you find them -- with comments on blogs and on-line news items, with phone-ins to radio shows, with letters to the editor in newspapers and with in-person corrections with friends and colleagues.
     And please forward this email widely via email, Facebook and Twitter.
     We're picking on NPR because it has been getting worse and worse in its coverage of immigration issues. The story in question was about the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Arizona's law requiring all employers to use E-Verify.
Falsehood #1
     The correspondent inexplicably said, "Now, E-verify is a sort of a pilot computer-data-check system that Congress specifically made voluntary because about one out of five workers is erroneously reported as illegal because of mistaken name spellings, similar names, things like that."
     Congress did not make E-Verify voluntary because of an error rate.  E-Verify was originally made voluntary because it was a pilot program.  It has remained mostly voluntary against the wishes of American voters because the cheap labor lobby had been incredibly successful at keeping it that way until several states stepped up to the plate . But this is a small mistake compared to the "one out of five" whopper.
Falsehood #2
See quote above about the one-in-five error rate.
     The NPR correspondent's approximation of an error rate for E-Verify of 20% isn't even close to the truth.
     The percentage of authorized workers run through E-Verify who receive tentative non-confirmations is 0.3 percent (three-tenths of one percent), and has been for at least two and a half years.
     Statistics from Fiscal Year 2010, however, indicate that of the 15,640,167 E-Verify cases submitted:

• 98.3% were automatically confirmed as work authorized,
  
• 0.3% were confirmed as work authorized after contesting and resolving an initial nonconfirmationan avenue available to all workers
  
• 1.43% were not found work authorized (these would be illegal aliens or legal foreign visitors without a work permit -- the very people E-Verify is designed to keep out of U.S. jobs)
       So, to make sure you understand, the so-called error rate is 0.3% which means that less than half of one percent of the people run through the system get a notice that they are not yet approved to work even though it turns out they do have the right to work.
       Next, be clear that this 0.3% don't lose their job.  Rather, they continue on their job while checking with federal authorities to find out why they are not being confirmed and getting their records straight.  The fact that 0.3% of the queries produce an "error" doesn't mean that anybody who has the legal right to a job doesn't get to keep the job.
       NPR did not have to read the Court's decision to get their facts straight.  All they had to do was go to the USCIS website, where the most recent statistics are presented in a colorful pie chart.  We don't know which source led NPR so astray, but somewhere, someone is getting high fives for pulling one over on the news team of "All Things Considered."

     We hope to see a national mandatory E-Verify bill start moving through the House any week now.
     The supporters of illegal immigration are nearly hysterical about this and are unleashing an incredible misinformation effort.  And their main trick seems to be to lie about error rates in E-Verify.
     They have been so successful in their lies about error rates that we've even seen some people and organizations that generally have been opposed to illegal immigration repeating the falsehoods.
     Read the full blog and join the discussion by clicking here.
THANKS, Roy Beck, NumbersUSA.com

---

o'amnesty - Old White People Should Die? (o'Dream on...) [redux] "Contact your Senators & Representative"

From: drude Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 Subject:  Old White People Should Die?

Well, all right then.

I report, you decide.

HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT
     Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets;  "Go back to Boston ! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out!  We are the future.  You are old and tired.  Go on.  We have beaten you.  Leave like beaten rats...  You old white people. It is your duty to die.  Through love of having children, we are going to take over.
     Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council.  "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions.  They're right.  We will take them over. ... We are here to stay."
     Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico,  "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."
     Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas;  "We have an aging white America.  They are not making babies.  They are dying.  The explosion is in our population . . . I love it.  I love it."
    Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187 -- proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens -- was the last gasp of white America in California ."
   Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor;  "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country. ... . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."
    Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton," California is going to be a Hispanic state.  Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
    Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General;  "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University;  "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos. ... Are these just the words of a few extremists?  Consider that we could fill up many pages with such quotes.   Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders.
     THE U.S VS MEXICO:  On February 15, 1998, the U.S. And Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum.  The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country.  They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. Flags were held upside down.  As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. Team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon.  Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. Players before and after the match.  The coach of the U.S. Team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."
     HOW CAN YOU HELP?:   Send copies of this letter to at least two other people, 100 would be even better.  Help us get the word out.  It's no longer a fight between Democrats and Republicans.   It's the producers versus the parasites.

---

Gov't Memo Proposes Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants (news video, 30Jul10)

Video and Audio (http://foxnews.com/)

1.  
   
   Will Tax Cut Bill Pass House?
   

   … We still have the start treaty. Dream act the house version. And possibly ..... and so you think start gets through dream act through an act of kind on the edge ..... t Tell standalone a little about college yet because you know Collins thinks …

   ---

   Dream Act found at 6:00, 7:00
   

   "…the start treaty. Dream act the house…"

   "…gets through dream act -- through an…"
2.  
   
   Panel Plus: 12/12
   

   … public option health care. He didn't spend enough money in the stimulus the first time there's no immigration reform the dream act is all hung up around here. So people are saying look at what about energy cap and trade that got Did this president …

   ---

   The Dream Act found at 2:59
   

   "…reform the dream act is all hung up…"
3.  
   
   Too Lax on Tax Deal Coverage?
   

   … a secret message that we're still committed to our agenda he talked about Don't Ask Don't Tell he talked about the dream act . As if to say don't be too mad asked still with you we'll big conspiracy. Yeah the if into the eye opener and …

   ---

   The Dream Act found at 4:24
   

   "…he talked about the dream act . As if…"
4.  
   
   House Dems Dig in Heels Over Tax Cut Deal
   

   … amounts that we can't trust him yet another Hitler had southern Democrat was on MSNBC yesterday saying. This isn't the dream act this is a blank dream well you know and I very harsh critic. Makes conservatives really happen the Biden can't currency …

   ---

   The Dream Act found at 0:39
   

   "…This isn't the dream act this is a…"
5.  
   
   DREAM Act Lives On?
   

   … yesterday. It's known as the dream act and it offers a path ..... not going to address the dream act or don't ask don ..... the floor but really the dream act is a nightmare to American ..... re serving in the military . Now anyone under the …
   

   ---

   The Dream Act found at 0:14, 0:40, 1:11
   

   "…It's known as the dream act and it…"

   "…going to address the dream act or don'…"

   "…floor but really the dream act is a…"

More Video and Audio »

---

Contact the U.S. government & the Media SENATORS toll free: 877-851-6437 & 866-220-0044 or (toll) 202-225-3121 HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES: 202-224-3121 PRESIDENT of the United States: 202-456-1111 & 202-456-1414 & FAX: 202-456-2461 WH Legislative Affairs: 202-456-2230 All FED via http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Directories.shtml Live Debates: Senate & House + CSpan Congress, POTUS, other FED, BookTV & Wash. Journal More Phone Numbers links: http://callcongressnow.com Fax numbers & eMail Addresses: http://conservativeusa.org/mega-cong.htm (facsimile/email) Fax & phone #s to 'Grassfire.org' Congressional list: http://www.grassfire.com/3122/targets.htm

---

o'illegal - California's Penal Code: Section 834b (immigration law)

From: burd Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 Subject: PC section 834b - California immigration law

reference: 

http://www.americanpatrol.com/REFERENCE/PENALCODE/834b-CA_PC.html

Voter approved California law aimed at dealing with illegal aliens

Ever read California Penal Code 834b?  If not, educate yourself! 

PC§ 834b. INS Arrests

(a) Every law enforcement agency in California shall fully cooperate with the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service regarding any person who is arrested if he or she is suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws.
(b) With respect to any such person who is arrested, and suspected of being present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws, every law enforcement agency shall do the following:
(1) Attempt to verify the legal status of such person as a citizen of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted as a permanent resident, an alien lawfully admitted for a temporary period of time or as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of immigration laws. The verification process may include, but shall not be limited to, questioning the person regarding his or her date and place of birth, and entry into the United States, and demanding documentation to indicate his or her legal status.
(2) Notify the person of his or her apparent status as an alien who is present in the United States in violation of federal immigration laws and inform him or her that, apart from any criminal justice proceedings, he or she must either obtain legal status or leave the United States.
(3) Notify the Attorney General of California and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service of the apparent illegal status and provide any additional information that may be requested by any other public entity.
(c) Any legislative, administrative, or other action by a city, county, or other legally authorized local governmental entity with jurisdictional boundaries, or by a law enforcement agency, to prevent or limit the cooperation required by subdivision (a) is expressly prohibited. 

 
So, why is the Obama administration suing Arizona today when CA has tougher laws on illegal immigration? And CA takes it a step further by prohibiting sanctuary cities (like SF and LA) from interfering with the enforcement of immigration laws as well (3c). Is the Obama administration going to sue Calif, Rhode Island, Missouri and all the other states with existing laws or just the states that enforce them? 

---

o'amnesty - Scholarships for Illegals In California v "Immigration in the 1900s"

Our President could be a 'poster child' for this college's ambitions! -- rfh

Related Links:

Feds Issue Terror Watch for the Texas/Mexico Border

From: loeb Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 Subject: Now Scholarships for Illegals

California College Offers Scholarship to Illegal Immigrants!

 by Jana Winter, Published May 28, 2010, FOXNews. 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/05/28/calif-college-offers-scholarship-to-illegals/
          A public community college in California has set up a scholarship fund for immigrant students — including illegal immigrants. The $2,500 scholarship has sparked anger by some, including at least one lawmaker who is threatening to cut off federal funding to the school.

     Orange County's Santa Ana College says the controversial new memorial scholarship will be funded by private donations and honors former student Tan Ngoc Tran, a student leader and immigrant-rights activist who transferred to Brown University before she was killed by a drunk driver on May 15.

     Students eligible for the new scholarship must have a 3.0 or higher grade point average, demonstrate a financial need and must also be trying to become an American citizen. Those eligible include students holding green cards, students who have permanent residency — and illegal, undocumented immigrants.

     The scholarship was announced by the Santa Ana College Foundation at an informal memorial service for Tran held at Santa Ana College on Wednesday, said Laurie Weidner, spokeswoman for the Rancho Santiago Community College District, which governs Santa Ana College.

     Weidner repeatedly emphasized to FoxNews.com that no public funds would be used for the scholarship.  But Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., whose district includes the taxpayer-funded Santa Ana College, says that isn't quite true — because the scholarship diverts resources from Americans in need of education funds.

     "The fact that a public employee of a public college is seeking to circumvent immigration laws is problematic," he told FoxNews.com. "The fact that it's being associated with a public institution means there's public funds involved: If you have a fund being operated by public employees, it's public."

     He said he could not believe that a college would announce such a scholarship at a time when the majority of Americans has increased concerns about security threats along the U.S.-Mexico border.

     The Department of Homeland Security recently sent out an alert regarding a Somali man with reported terror ties who the agency believes is trying to sneak into the U.S. over the Mexican border.

     "They totally misread the will of the people," Rohrabacher said of the school. "It's very bizarre."

     The GOP lawmaker sent a letter to Santa Ana President Erlinda Martinez and has been in touch with members of the district board.

     District board member Philip Yarborough — who is an elected official — says he's gotten a flurry of calls from outraged taxpayers who do not want public schools giving priority funding to illegal immigrants.

     He was trying to find out exactly where the money would come from to fund this memorial scholarship.

     But Weidner, the district spokeswoman, said critics are overreacting, and said the privately funded scholarship is meant to honor a "wonderful student leader" who continued her education after community college.

     Tran, 27, was an undocumented immigrant pursuing a doctorate degree at Brown University at the time of her death. She was a leading member of the Dream Team, an activist group lobbying for the passage of the Dream Act, a bill that would provide certain protections for illegal immigrants living in the country, including giving access to scholarship money.

     "We want all of our students to dream big and go to an Ivy league school — if they try hard and keep their focus, they can have the American dream too," said Weidner.

     In his letter to the president of Santa Ana College, Rohrabacher called the scholarship "an affront to law abiding citizens whose tax dollars will pay the bill" and "an unconscionable insult to immigrants who took the time and considerable effort to come to this country legally."

     "Channeling our scarce resources to illegal immigrants, even if they are students, is unforgivable at a time when so many of our citizens and legal residents are struggling to meet their own education needs," he wrote. "[I]f you feel compelled to misrepresent the interests of the taxpayers and your own students you are putting continued public financing for Santa Ana College in jeopardy."

PEOPLE WHO READ THIS ALSO READ

• California Police Say Man Beheads Neighbor at Military Base 34475954
• White House Asked Bill Clinton to Urge Sestak to Drop Out of Senate Race 34467882
• Wisconsin Army Veteran Allowed to Keep Flag on Display 34467602
• Counterterror Adviser Defends Jihad as 'Legitimate Tenet of Islam' 34427094
• Wisconsin Veteran Must Remove Flag After Memorial Day, Wife Says 34379354

---

Coming to America in the 1900's

Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented.

Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.

  

They had waved goodbye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.

 Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany, Italy, France and Japan. None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. 


They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan. They were defending the United States of America as one people.

When we liberated France, no one in those villages were looking for the French American, the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. When we liberated France, no one in those villages were looking for the French American, the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. 











Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.

Get a load of the illegal aliens' attitude of American citizens:

And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country.  I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about.

 I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.

And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty, it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet. 

related, The American Flag:  http://harrold.org/rfhextra/flag.html

---

o'illegal - Illegal Immigration in MIssouri

From: baja Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010

Missouri is ahead of it's time. Thought you would be interested in reading.

In 2007, Missouri placed on the ballot a proposed constitutional amendment designating English as the Official language of Missouri .  Nearly 90% voting in favor!  English became the official language for ALL governmental proceeding in Missouri .  It also means no individual has the right to demand government services in a language OTHER than English.

In 2008 a measure was passed that requires our Highway Patrol and other law enforcement officials to verify the immigration status of any person arrested, and inform federal authorities if the person is found to be here illegally.  It allows Missouri law enforcement offices to receive training to enforce federal immigration laws.  The bill makes it clear that illegal immigrants will NOT have access to taxpayers benefits such as food stamps and health care through Missouri HealthNET.

In 2009 a measure was passed that ensures Missouri 's public institutions of higher education do NOT award financial aid to individuals who are here illegally.  The law also requires all post-secondary institutions of higher education to annually certify to the Missouri Dept. of Higher Education that they have NOT knowingly awarded financial aid to students who are unlawfully present in the United States.

So while Arizona has made national news for its new law, it is important to remember Missouri has been proactive in addressing this growing problem.

Missouri has sent a clear message that illegal immigrants are NOT welcome in our state and they are certainly NOT welcome to receive public benefits at the cost of Missouri taxpayers!

Article in "The Ozarks Sentinel" Editorial Opinion - Nita Jane Ayres, May 13, 2010

---

o'sophist - o'illegal is Race Pandering For Hispanic Votes

From: AmeriPAC at http://ameripac.org Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010

 

    http://harrolds.blogspot.com/2010/05/illegals-read-arizona-law-sb1070-hb2162.html

 

A     ALERT: Page 1 Section E. of the Arizona Immigration Law.

        A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, WITHOUT A WARRANT, MAY ARREST A PERSON IF THE OFFICER   HAS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON HAS COMMITTED ANY PUBLIC OFFENSE THAT MAKES THE PERSON REMOVABLE FROM THE UNITED STATES.

    

       Support Arizona's Immigration Law NOW!
   Arizona Has Passed STRONG Law Against Illegal Immigration.  The Obama, Holder, Janet Napolitano and other lawyers and politicians in the White House respond and: Admit they have not read the 10 page Arizona Immigration Law , Threaten to sue the State of Arizona, Race pander for Hispanic Votes, falsely claim to Profile everyone with brown skin as an Illegal Mexican. These lawyers do not seem to understand Probable Cause. It is defined as - Reasonable cause; having more evidence for than against; a reasonable belief that a crime has or is being committed and is the basis for all lawful searches and arrests.

    For example, a police officer may claim there is probable cause for attempted theft when someone is found trespassing on private property late at night wearing a stocking mask, in order to justify stopping and searching the person for possession of criminal tools. Then ask for ID.

Being in the U.S illegally is already a crime and checking ID's is sensible?

OF COURSE it is -- but the federal government has FAILED in its duty to put a STOP to the illegal immigration INVASION at our southern border; so, the people of Arizona have "stepped up to the plate" and done it themselves!

Even though this is a law that EVERY STATE IN AMERICA SHOULD PASS, Arizona is coming under attack by the forces we've fought so many times before: the pro-illegal immigration lobby. Now Obama and angry politician's are terrorizing American Cities by weakening the authority of law enforcement to use probable cause to fight crime. American's seem to have probable cause to be concerned about the White House failing to protect American communities.

It's time to FIGHT BACK -- and we've got just the way to fight them!  Simply put, the new Arizona law will make it a crime under State law to be in the country illegally. It would also require local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal immigrants. Other provisions of the bill allow lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws, and make it illegal to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them. As Gov. Brewer said when signing the law, this "protects every Arizona citizen," and she said the state MUST act because the federal government has FAILED.

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation."

EXACTLY. Arizona alone spends $3 billion a year to educate, medicate and incarcerate illegal aliens. But, as has happened with every other State facing this invasion, the federal government has done NOTHING to stop the flow of illegals from the south.

Of course, the response from Barack Hussein Obama and his liberal cronies in Congress was exactly as expected: cries of "racism" and "profiling," instead of listening to the voices of the American people DEMANDING they enforce the laws that are already on the books. In fact, numerous polls show a HUGE majority of public support for this new law, and many polls conducted over the last few years show that 81% of Americans believe that "local and state police should help federal authorities enforce laws against illegal immigration" -- 81 percent!

But despite all of this, supporters of illegal immigration are trying to REVERSE Arizona's law, STOP Congress from enforcing existing laws, and PREVENT any other State from passing a law like Arizona's -- and that means WE have to take action NOW!

TELL EVERY SINGLE GOVERNOR AND MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO SUPPORT ARIZONA'S NEW LAW: SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

It's already started: supporters of illegal immigration are now busing protesters in to the Arizona capitol from as far away as Los Angeles. They have surrounded the capitol building, demanding their "rights" -- meaning, their "rights" to BREAK THE LAW by coming to this country ILLEGALLY!!!

Not only that -- they're going so far as to threaten to MURDER Americans with axes and shovels! Have you even HEARD that on the mainstream media news? Of course not -- but it's right there on YouTube for all the world to see!

WE MUST FIGHT BACK AGAINST THESE PROPONENTS OF BREAKING OUR LAWS AND THREATENING OUR CITIZENS!

So, we've set up our website to enable you to send "Blast Faxes" to every single U.S. Senator, every single U.S. Representative, and every single U.S. State Governor, ALL AT ONCE, demanding that they SUPPORT Arizona's new law against illegal immigration, and SUPPORT efforts for every single state to pass the same law!

For about what it would cost you in time and telephone charges, you can send Blast Faxes to Democrats, Republicans, Independents -- EVERYONE in Congress and EVERY Governor, DEMANDING that they supporting putting a STOP to illegal immigration!   Please, take action right away to DEMAND that Congress and Governors SUPPORT the new law against illegal immigration recently passed by Arizona, and to ENCOURAGE every single State to pass the same law!
 
It's time we stood up and said enough is enough!  VOTE in every state and every election by helping AmeriPAC send support where it is needed.

Please join us with your AmeriPAC donation TODAY. Thank you.  For more information, visit www.ameripac.org

Sincerely, Alan M. Gottlieb, Chairman, AmeriPAC www.AmeriPAC.org 

P.S. It's really VERY VERY SIMPLE: As state Rep. Russell Pearce of Mesa, AZ, stated, "Illegal is illegal. We'll have less crime. We'll have lower taxes. We'll have safer neighborhoods. We'll have shorter lines in the emergency rooms. We'll have smaller classrooms."

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT?  Arizona has an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants and is the state with the most illegal border crossings, with the harsh, remote desert serving as the gateway for thousands of Mexicans and Central Americans. And they have the RIGHT to pass laws enforcing existing laws against illegal immigration!

Politicians in at least five states are calling for their state legislatures to adopt immigration laws that mirror Arizona's new law -- let's make that ALL FIFTY STATES!  Send your faxes right away to make sure these elected officials get OUR message, and not the pro-illegal immigration message of bussed-in protestors -- Thank you

 

Please make checks payable to: American Political Action Committee (AmeriPAC) PO Box Paid for by AmeriPAC, a federally-authorized and qualified multicandidate political action committee. Contributions to AmeriPAC will be used in connection with federal elections. Maximum contribution per individual per calendar year is $5,000. Contributions from foreign nationals and corporations are prohibited. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

---

illegals - An open letter: "Great example of what SB 1070 means."

From: gg/tf Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010  "Well said!!  Well said indeed!!," GG.

---

If you had tickets to a sports event, concert,  Disneyland , or on an airplane, and when you got to your assigned seat, and someone else was in that seat, what would you do? You would call for a person in charge of ticket checking and have the person in your seat removed. You would be properly asked to show your ticket, and you would gladly and proudly do so, for you have bought and paid for that seat. The person in your seat would also be asked for a ticket, and they would not be able to produce one. They would be called "gate crashers" and they would be properly removed.

Now in this huge stadium called the   USA we have had millions of gate crashers. We have been asking security to check for tickets and remove the gate crashers. We have been asking security to have better controls in checking at the door. We have asked security to lock the back doors. Security has failed us. They are still looking the other way. They are afraid to ask to see the tickets. Many people say there is unlimited seating, and whether there is or not, no one should be allowed in for free while the rest of us pay full price!

In section AZ, of Stadium   USA , we have had enough of the failures of Security. We have decided to do our own ticket checking, and properly remove those who do not have tickets. Now it seems very strange to me that so many people in the other 49 sections, and even many in our own section do not want tickets checked, or even be asked to show their ticket! Even the head of Security is chastising us, while not doing his own job which he has sworn to do.

My own ticket has been bought and paid for so I am going to proudly show it when asked to do so. I have a right to my seat, and I want the gate crashers to be asked to show their tickets too. The only reason that I can imagine anyone objecting to being asked for their ticket is that they are in favor of gate crashing, and all of the illegal activities that go with it. Such as drug smuggling, gang wars, murder, human smuggling for profit, and many more illegal and inhumane acts that we are trying to prevent with our new legislation.

Is that what I am hearing from all of the protesters such as Phoenix Mayor Gordon, US Representative Grijalva, even President Obama?  If you are not in favor of showing tickets,(proof of citizenship, passport, green card, or other legal document) when asked, as I would proudly do, then you must be condoning those illegal activities.
Tom Moody, United States citizen, Arizona

---

illegals - I have to show an I.D.

From: thy Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 Subject: My statement

I must show ID when:
1. Pulled over by the police

2. Making purchases on my master card or VISA credit card.  Every dang time.

3. When I show up for a doctor's appointment.

4. When filling out a credit card or loan application.

5. When applying for/renewing a driver's license or passport.

6. When applying for any kind of insurance.

7. When filling out college applications.

8. When donating blood.

9. When obtaining certain prescription drugs.

10. When making some debit purchases, especially if I'm out of state.

11. When collecting a boarding pass for airline or train travel.

I'm sure there are more instances but the point is, we citizens are required to prove who we are nearly every day.

Why should people illegally in this country be exempt?

Why should they be calling us racists or bigots?

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books+Federalist Papers	History+Documents	Quotations+American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath "Scots Wha Hae"	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution+more Amendments