From: hh Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009
In the early 20th century, Argentina was one of the richest countries in the world. While Great Britain 's maritime power and its far-flung empire had propelled it to a dominant position among the world's industrialized nations, only the United States challenged Argentina for the position of the world's second-most powerful economy.
It was blessed with abundant agriculture, vast swaths of rich farmland laced with navigable rivers and an accessible port system. Its level of industrialization was higher than many European countries: railroads, automobiles and telephones were commonplace.
In 1916, a new president was elected. H ipólito Irigoyen had formed a party called The Radicals under the banner of "fundamental change" with an appeal to the middle class.
Among Irigoyen's changes: mandatory pension insurance, mandatory health insurance, and support for low-income housing construction to stimulate the economy. Put simply, the state assumed economic control of a vast swath of the country's operations and began assessing new payroll taxes to fund its efforts.
With an increasing flow of funds into these entitlement programs, the government's payouts soon became overly generous. Before long its outlays surpassed the value of the taxpayers' contributions. Put simply, it quickly became under-funded, much like the United States ' Social Security and Medicare programs.
The death knell for the Argentine economy, however, came with the election of Juan Perón. Perón had a fascist and corporatist upbringing; he and his charismatic wife aimed their populist rhetoric at the nation's rich.
This targeted group "swiftly expanded to cover most of the propertied middle classes, who became an enemy to be defeated and humiliated."
Under Perón, the size of government bureaucracies exploded through massive programs of social spending and by encouraging the growth of labor unions.
High taxes and economic mismanagement took their inevitable toll even after Perón had been driven from office. But his populist rhetoric and "contempt for economic realities" lived on. Argentina's federal government continued to spend far beyond its means.
Hyperinflation exploded in 1989, the final stage of a process characterized by "industrial protectionism, redistribution of income based on increased wages, and growing state intervention in the economy..."
The Argentinian government's practice of printing money to pay off its public debts had crushed the economy. Inflation hit 3000%, reminiscent of the Weimar Republic . Food riots were rampant; stores were looted; the country descended into chaos.
And by 1994, Argentina 's public pensions -- the equivalent of Social Security -- had imploded. The payroll tax had increased from 5% to 26%, but it wasn't enough. In addition, Argentina had implemented a value-added tax (VAT), new income taxes, a personal tax on wealth, and additional revenues based upon the sale of public enterprises. These crushed the private sector, further damaging the economy.
A government-controlled "privatization" effort to rescue seniors' pensions was attempted. But, by 2001, those funds had also been raided by the government, the monies replaced by Argentina 's defaulted government bonds.
By 2002, "...government fiscal irresponsibility... induced a national economic crisis as severe as America 's Great Depression."
In 1902 Argentina was one of the world's richest countries.
Little more than a hundred years later, it is poverty-stricken, struggling to meet its debt obligations amidst a drought.
We've seen this movie before. The Democrats' populist plans can't possibly work, because government bankrupts everything it touches. History teaches us that ObamaCare and unfunded entitlement programs will be utter, complete disasters.
Today's Democrats are guilty of more than stupidity; they are enslaving future generations to poverty and misery. And they will be long gone when it all implodes. They will be as cold and dead as Juan Perón when the piper must ultimately be paid.
References: A tear for Argentina's pension funds; Inflation in Argentina; The United States of Argentina.
Linked by: Dan Riehl. Thanks!
an email repost:
If you don't think this can happen here in the US, please try to explain how all the proposed programs will be paid for when:
How long it takes to destroy US civilization will depend on how the pending ridiculous, and future, legislation is voted into law by Senators and Legislatures and Presidents. These people have virtually no understanding of how to run the largest "Business" or "Entity" in existence as they have no background training to do so. If you think otherwise, simply contact your Senators and Legislatures and ask them to explain how we will be able to support so many increasing financial needs with unquestionable dwindling financial resources. How can they possibly demand their selfish earmarks and put additional strain on our economy. I am contacting my representatives and I'm anxious to hear their responses. Be prepared for double-talk and lack of common sense - - - and please use your common sense when interpreting their responses - - - again, if you get any.
If you are brave enough to ask questions, and if you get any answers, please pass them on to me and to your networks. The answers will either mysteriously explain the unexplainable and we can all breathe easier or, you may begin to look at things differently and with greater concern.
Thanks, Gary
an email repost:
If you don't think this can happen here in the US, please try to explain how all the proposed programs will be paid for when:
- More people are living much longer after they retire
- As they live longer, they also require more medical and healthcare treatment
- This costs more money
- The number of people who feel they should receive entitlement is continually increasing.
- This costs more money
- The ratio of those retiring, and continuing to live, as well as those who feel they are "entitled", is continuing to increase in comparison to the numbers in the workforce
- The workforce of the future will be required to provide more dollars (increased taxes) to support the retired US citizens and the "needs", "wants" and "entitlements" of the (plain and simple) lazy people who also reside in the US.
- These increased taxes, with no greater personal benefit for the individual working person, will destroy the motivation of those who are working to continue to work.
- It will be impossible to economically sustain life as we might imagine it in the United States.
How long it takes to destroy US civilization will depend on how the pending ridiculous, and future, legislation is voted into law by Senators and Legislatures and Presidents. These people have virtually no understanding of how to run the largest "Business" or "Entity" in existence as they have no background training to do so. If you think otherwise, simply contact your Senators and Legislatures and ask them to explain how we will be able to support so many increasing financial needs with unquestionable dwindling financial resources. How can they possibly demand their selfish earmarks and put additional strain on our economy. I am contacting my representatives and I'm anxious to hear their responses. Be prepared for double-talk and lack of common sense - - - and please use your common sense when interpreting their responses - - - again, if you get any.
If you are brave enough to ask questions, and if you get any answers, please pass them on to me and to your networks. The answers will either mysteriously explain the unexplainable and we can all breathe easier or, you may begin to look at things differently and with greater concern.
Thanks, Gary
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please, avoid posting advertisements. Content comments are welcomed, including anonymous. Posts with profanity will not be published.