o'nocchio - WP Rebuts Obama’s Malicious Lie(s)

From: drude Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 Subject: Washington Post Rebuts Obama's Malicious Lie

Posted on May 1, 2012 by John Hinderaker in 2012 Presidential Election, Obama administration

Washington Post Rebuts Obama's Malicious Lie

     Barack Obama never lets truth get in the way of political advantage.  Nothing new about that; mendacity has been a consistent theme of his 3 1/2 years in office.  But it seems that more media outlets are willing to call the president on his falsehoods these days.  Like, for example, Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post, who yesterday assigned Obama four Pinocchios – "whopper," the worst possible designation – for his lies about infrastructure projects.  Here is the tale as Obama told it to the Building and Construction Trades Department conference:

     I sent them a jobs bill that would have put hundreds of thousands of construction workers back to work repairing our roads, our bridges, schools, transit systems, along with saving the jobs of cops and teachers and firefighters, creating a new tax cut for businesses.  They said no.  I went to the Speaker's hometown, stood under a bridge that was crumbling.  Everybody acknowledges it needs to be rebuilt.  Maybe he doesn't drive anymore.  Maybe he doesn't notice how messed up it was.  They still said no.  There are bridges between Kentucky and Ohio where some of the key Republican leadership come from, where folks are having to do detours an extra hour, hour-and-a-half drive every day on their commute because these bridges don't work. They still said no.

As Kessler notes, this isn't the first time Obama has told this particular whopper:

Let's take a drive down memory lane.
     Back in September, when President Obama first unveiled his jobs bill, we gave him Three Pinocchios for remarks he made regarding the aging Brent Spence Bridge on the Ohio River.  The bridge connects Kentucky and Ohio, the home states of House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and it was irresistible symbolism for the White House.
     The crumbling infrastructure of the nation's bridges is certainly an important issue, but symbolism can only go so far.  The administration could never explain what, if anything, the jobs bill would do to improve the Brent Spence Bridge, especially since construction was not slated to start until 2015 — and Obama's jobs bill would spend most of its money in its first year.  Moreover, there is a long history of bipartisan support for this project, but Obama framed it as if the Republicans were blocking its reconstruction with their opposition to his legislation.

     And, of course, Obama had a golden opportunity to spend money on infrastructure projects in his "stimulus" bill, for which there would have been bipartisan support; but instead, the Democrats allocated most of the spending to public employees in blue states and hardly any to infrastructure.
     This time, as Kessler points out, Obama compounded his earlier offense in talking about bridges:

     [T]hen he upped the ante by mentioning other bridges "between Kentucky and Ohio" that "don't work."  So what's he talking about?
     An administration official said the president was referring to the Sherman Milton Bridge, which actually connects Indiana and Kentucky, near Louisville.  Back in September, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels (R) had to shut down the bridge because a 2 ½ inch crack had been discovered.
     The bridge carries Interstate 64, so the bridge's closure forced drivers to make major changes in their driving routes.  Shortly after the shutdown, a Transportation Department blog declared that this bridge was "another example of why this [the president's jobs bill] is so crucial."
     But here's the rub: While Obama claimed "these bridges don't work," the Sherman Milton Bridge has already been repaired, ahead of schedule, and motorists are driving over it again.
     It turned out that, rather than being an example of an aging bridge, the crack that had been discovered actually had been there ever since the bridge was constructed in 1962, because of the type of steel used at the time.  Other repairs were ordered, and the bridge reopened nearly three months ago — without needing any of Obama's jobs-bill funds.

Kessler concluded:

Calling out the Republicans at the Brent Spence bridge was bad enough, given the bipartisan support for its reconstruction.  But pointing to the Sherman Milton Bridge, which already has been repaired without funding from the president's jobs bill, is ridiculous.

So once again, Obama was simply lying.  Sure, many politicians have been willing to stretch the truth to get re-elected.  But for flat-out misrepresentations, I can't recall one who can equal Obama.

---