o'nocchio - The Mess that Obama inherited EXPLAINED!!!!

`Oh, there's no use in talking to him,' said Alice desperately: `he's perfectly idiotic!' 

...Alice's Adventures in Wonderland

o'campaigner-in-chief - "To lie is to hold something which one knows is not the whole truth to be the whole truth, intentionally.  In some situations, including perjury and some fraud, lying may be punishable by law."

o'lying by omission - "Also known as a continuing misrepresentation, a lie by omission occurs when an important fact is left out in order to foster a misconception.  Lying by omission includes failures to correct pre-existing misconceptions.  When the seller of a car declares it has been serviced regularly but does not tell that a fault was reported at the last service, the seller lies by omission."

source, Wikipedia: Ways to Lie - In the story of Pinocchio, his nose grows longer when he tells a lie.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie

---

From: thy Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 Subject: The "Mess" that Obama inherited EXPLAINED!!!!

In the story of Pinocchio, his nose
 grows longer when he tells a lie.

The "Mess" that Obama inherited and how
     This tells the story, why Bush was so bad at the end of his term.
    Don't just skim over this, it's not very long, read it slowly and let it sink in. If in doubt, check it out!!!
     The day the democrats took over was not January 22nd, 2009, it was actually January 3rd, 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.
     The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.
     For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress.
     At the time:
     The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77
     The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%.  The Unemployment rate was 4.6%.
     George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH.  

    Remember the day...
     January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.
     The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?  BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!
     Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!
     Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy.
     And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac?  OBAMA.

Q - And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?
A - OBAMA and the Democrat Congress
So when someone tries to blame Bush...
     REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007. ...THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"
     Budgets do not come from the White House.  They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.
     Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.
     In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.
     For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office.  At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets.
     And where was Barack Obama during this time?  He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.
     If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets.  That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending.  After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.
     If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.  In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.
     There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!  I am forwarding it now and then again right before the next election in November.

Pinocchio image, source: Wikipedia

---

2nd Amendment - ATF Director testifies against Obama plot

Isn't about time that Congress wakes and acknowledges the BATFE abuses and abolish the agency?  Plus, the DOJ, the DEA & the FBI should be curtailed from conducting nefarious activities.  Citizens' Constitutional Rights and the sovereignty of states & foreign countries should be protected by agents of the United States government, especially since they are sworn to protect the U.S. and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, while protecting the rights of the citizenry. -- rfh

 "An informed citizenry is the only true repository of the public will." -- Thomas Jefferson

From: rapa Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 Subject: ATF Director testifies against Obama plot

Good for Melson.  It appears that he spoke out when he realized he was about to become the DOJ's sacrificial goat. -- rapa

Issa, Grassley: DOJ Obstructed Mexican Guns Probe
By Martin Gould and Abigail Walls, NewsMax.com

     The top man in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) has turned sensationally against his Department of Justice bosses saying they were trying to stymie an investigation into the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

     Kenneth Melson, acting director of the ATF, gave a secret deposition to Congress on July 4, it was revealed today.  He took his own lawyer instead of relying on one from the ATF.

     The stunning move will increase pressure on Attorney General Eric Holder to resign over the operation that saw some 2,000 guns sold to straw buyers who then sold them to Mexican drug cartel leaders.

     But Fast and Furious and its sister plan, Project Gunrunner, went disastrously wrong, and 80 percent of the weapons went missing.  Two were found at the Arizona site where Border Agent Brian Terry was killed in December.

     Republicans leading the investigation in both the House and Senate wrote a stinging letter to Holder yesterday informing him of Melson's move, calling it "extremely helpful to our investigation.

     Rep. Darrell Issa and Sen. Charles Grassley wrote, "He was candid in admitting mistakes that his agency made and described various ways he says that he tried to remedy the problems."

     Issa and Grassley said Melson claimed that ATF's senior leadership would have preferred to be more cooperative with the congressional probe.

     "However, he said that Justice Department officials directed them not to respond and took full control of replying to briefing and document requests from Congress.  The result is that Congress only got the parts of the story that the Department wanted us to hear," they wrote.

     "If his account is accurate, then ATF leadership appears to have been effectively muzzled while the DoJ sent over false denials and buried its head in the sand."

     Issa and Grassley also said that Melson claimed that the Justice Department falsely leaked stories to the press that he was about to resign over Fast and Furious.  They warned Holder against firing him now.  "It would be inappropriate for the Justice Department to take action against him that could have the effect of intimidating others who might want to provide additional information to the Committees."

     "Knowing what we know so far, we believe it would be inappropriate to make Mr. Melson the fall guy in an attempt to prevent further congressional oversight," they concluded.

     Just last week, Iowa Sen. Grassley told Newsmax.TV that he did not want to see Melson quit because one resignation would make it seem like the matter was over.  "There are too many people involved in it for me to be satisfied with one resignation," he said at the time.

     In their letter Grassley and California's Issa said Melson had been scheduled to give evidence on July 13 but brought the date forward when he realized he could take his own lawyer, Richard Cullen.

     "We are disappointed that no one had previously informed him of that provision of the agreement," the two GOP members wrote.

     "Instead, Justice Department officials sought to limit and control his communications with Congress.  This is yet another example of why direct communications with Congress are so important and are protected by law."

     The release of the letter came on the same day that Mexican officials said that any officer accused of supplying guns to the cartels should be tried in Mexico.

     "I feel my country's sovereignty was violated," Sen. Rene Arce Islas, the chairman of Mexico's Commission for National Security, told Fox News.  "They should be tried in the United States, and the Mexican government should also demand that they also be tried in Mexico since the incidents took place here.  There should be trials in both places."

     Operation Fast and Furious came to a head on Dec. 14, when Terry was killed in a scuffle along a smuggling route close to the Mexican border, and assault rifles found at the murder scene were traced back to Jaime Avila, who had bought them from a Phoenix gun shop.

     Avila had been allowed to buy the assault weapons even though the ATF suspected he would sell them to the drug cartels.  The plan was to trace the guns, with the hope of leading ATF agents to the drug kingpins.

     Even before Terry's murder, ATF agents and senior managers had expressed fierce opposition to the policy.  One agent called the strategy "insane."

     Another said, "We were fully aware the guns would probably be moved across the border to drug cartels where they could be used to kill."

     For months, ATF agents followed 50-caliber Barrett rifles and other guns believed headed for the Mexican border but were ordered to let these highly dangerous weapons go.

     CBS reports that one distraught agent often was overheard on ATF radios begging and pleading to be allowed to intercept transports.  The answer: "Negative.  Stand down."

     The Department of Justice, which oversees the ATF, claimed in a letter that the agency never knowingly permitted the sale of assault weapons to suspected gunrunners.

© Newsmax. All rights reserved.

---

o'emperor & o'queen - 'toons: Not necessarily funny, but true!

From: joeb Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 Subject: New political toons

---

2012 - o'Sign of the Times

From: piloto Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010

---

Life v death - LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report 7/17/10 #4942

From: Steven Ertelt  Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 Subject: LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report 7/17/10 #494
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Update - 

For news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Current Headlines

• Senate Judiciary Committee Will Vote on Pro-Abortion Elena Kagan This Week
• U.S Embassy in Kenya Denies Obama Admin Funding Pro-Abortion Constitution
• Americans Deserve to Hear How Donald Berwick Would Ration Medicare
• Pro-Lifers: White House Pregnancy Fund Could Fund Pro-Abortion Groups
• Pro-Life Women's Group Confident White House Pregnancy Funds Airtight
• Justice Ginsburg: Supreme Court Won't Reverse Roe v. Wade, Unlimited Abortion
• Pro-Life Advocates Protest National NAACP Convention Over Abortion Backing
• Sarah Palin's PAC Brings in Nearly $900K, May Point to 2012 Presidential Bid
• Newspaper: Kagan's Support for Infanticide-Abortion Should be "Kiss of Death"
• Obama Spokesman Evades Question About Rationing Appointee Donald Berwick
• State and International Pro-Life Headlines

---

o'ppeasement - End of the USA (Charles Krauthammer)

From: kd Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010

     PLEASE READ....A great article and all true...KD

                 Krauthammer: The fruits of weakness...

"The fruits of weakness"

By Charles Krauthammer © 2010 The Washington Post Company, Friday, May 21, 2010; A19 


It is perfectly obvious that Iran's latest uranium maneuver, brokered by Brazil and Turkey, is a ruse. Iran retains more than enough enriched uranium to make a bomb. And it continues enriching at an accelerated pace and to a greater purity (20 percent). Which is why the French foreign ministry immediately declared that the trumpeted temporary shipping of some Iranian uranium to Turkey will do nothing to halt Iran's nuclear program.

It will, however, make meaningful sanctions more difficult. America's proposed Security Council resolution is already laughably weak -- no blacklisting of Iran's central bank, no sanctions against Iran's oil and gas industry, no nonconsensual inspections on the high seas. Yet Turkey and Brazil -- both current members of the Security Council -- are so opposed to sanctions that they will not even discuss the resolution. And China will now have a new excuse to weaken it further.

But the deeper meaning of the uranium-export stunt is the brazenness with which Brazil and Turkey gave cover to the mullahs' nuclear ambitions and deliberately undermined U.S. efforts to curb Iran's program.

The real news is that already notorious photo: the president of Brazil, our largest ally in Latin America, and the prime minister of Turkey, for more than half a century the Muslim anchor of NATO, raising hands together with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the most virulently anti-American leader in the world.

That picture -- a defiant, triumphant take-that-Uncle-Sam -- is a crushing verdict on the Obama foreign policy. It demonstrates how rising powers, traditional American allies, having watched this administration in action, have decided that there's no cost in lining up with America's enemies and no profit in lining up with a U.S. president given to apologies and appeasement.

They've watched President Obama's humiliating attempts to appease Iran, as every rejected overture is met with abjectly renewed U.S. negotiating offers. American acquiescence reached such a point that the president was late, hesitant and flaccid in expressing even rhetorical support for democracy demonstrators who were being brutally suppressed and whose call for regime change offered the potential for the most significant U.S. strategic advance in the region in 30 years.

They've watched America acquiesce to Russia's re-exerting sway over Eastern Europe, over Ukraine (pressured by Russia last month into extending for 25 years its lease of the Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol) and over Georgia (Russia's de facto annexation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia is no longer an issue under the Obama "reset" policy).

They've watched our appeasement of Syria, Iran's agent in the Arab Levant -- sending our ambassador back to Syria even as it tightens its grip on Lebanon, supplies Hezbollah with Scuds and intensifies its role as the pivot of the Iran-Hezbollah-Hamas alliance. The price for this ostentatious flouting of the United States and its interests? Ever more eager U.S. "engagement."

They've observed the administration's gratuitous slap at Britain over the Falklands, its contemptuous treatment of Israel, its undercutting of the Czech Republic and Poland, and its indifference to Lebanon and Georgia. And in Latin America, they see not just U.S. passivity as Venezuela's Hugo Chávez organizes his anti-American "Bolivarian" coalition while deepening military and commercial ties with Iran and Russia. They saw active U.S. support in Honduras for a pro-Chávez would-be dictator seeking unconstitutional powers in defiance of the democratic institutions of that country.

This is not just an America in decline. This is an America in retreat -- accepting, ratifying and declaring its decline, and inviting rising powers to fill the vacuum.

Nor is this retreat by inadvertence. This is retreat by design and, indeed, on principle. It's the perfect fulfillment of Obama's adopted Third World narrative of American misdeeds, disrespect and domination from which he has come to redeem us and the world. Hence his foundational declaration at the U.N. General Assembly last September that "No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation" (guess who's been the dominant nation for the last two decades?) and his dismissal of any "world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another." (NATO? The West?)

Given Obama's policies and principles, Turkey and Brazil are acting rationally. Why not give cover to Ahmadinejad and his nuclear ambitions? As the United States retreats in the face of Iran, China, Russia and Venezuela, why not hedge your bets? There's nothing to fear from Obama, and everything to gain by ingratiating yourself with America's rising adversaries. After all, they actually believe in helping one's friends and punishing one's enemies.

letters@charleskrauthammer.com

---

2nd Amendment - o'behind closed doors: Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN!? Can anyone confirm she's signed?

From: lc Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010

Haven't verified, but here it is.... L.C.

Please take a moment to read the entire article, including the Reuter's linked article. While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN. 


OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE could BE WAR


On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States


On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before Naive US citizens even understand what has happened.


Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?


What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present! 


THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING.


As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto. The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here:


Click on the link below for further acknowledgement…..

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

article reposted below from the above Reuters news report: 

"U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade"

(Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."

"Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.

While praising the Obama administration's decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.

"The shift in position by the world's biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.

However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."

"Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International's policy adviser Debbie Hillier.

The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.

Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.

Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.

The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.

Arms exporters China, Russia and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.

The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.

The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.

A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by several nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.

(Editing by Eric Beech)

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.  This is a very serious matter! Silence will lead us to Socialism!!!  [Which may be upon us already! - rfh]

---

Life and Death - LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report 4/24/09 #4881

From: LifeNews.com  Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010
LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Current Headlines
 • Pro-Life Groups Condemn Obama Abortion Litmus Test for Supreme Court Pick
• Bill Would Apply Hyde Amendment to Obama's Pro-Abortion Health Care Law
• Democrats Lose Advantage to GOP in Poll After Pro-Abortion Health Care Vote
• GOP's Boehner to Get Pro-Life Award for Opposing Pro-Abortion Health Care 
• National Pro-Life T-Shirt Week Starts Next Week for Youth to Oppose Abortion
• Physically Disabled People Deserve a Chance at Life, Not Condemned to Abortion
• Louisiana House Approves Bill to Opt Out of Some Health Care Abortion Funding
• Oklahoma Governor Henry Vetoes Bill to Give Women Ultrasound Before Abortion
• United Nations Commission on Population, Development Sees Abortion Lobbying
• Center for Reproductive Rights Continues Pushing Abortion on Pro-Life Nations
• Michigan Senate Passes Bill for Transparency on Embryonic Stem Cell Research
• Idaho Pro-Life group Endorses Raul Labrador for Congress Against Minnick
• Northern Kentucky Pro-Life Group Sees Abortion Display Vandalized Again

Comments or questions?  Email us at news@lifenews.com.Copyright 2003-2010 LifeNews.com.  All rights reserved. For information on advertising or reprinting news from LifeNews.com, email us.

---

Excerpts from http://www.773.com - America's Final Solution


Many are unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Sanger’s "Negro Project," "the eugenic plan to limit — or exterminate — the black race and others "unfit to reproduce."  [..to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation [in camps] to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring."  [..by force if necessary.]   


"..during 1933 in Sanger´s The Birth Control Review (immediate predecessor to the Planned Parenthood Review) an article by Ernst Rudin (1874-1952) was published entitled, "Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need." Rudin was Adolph Hitler’s director of genetic sterilization and a founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. 


(Various references in Grand Illusions) History documents that Sanger supported the Nazi Party philosophies." [ Planned Parenthood's Nazi roots ] ; and -eugenical race-purification by prevention of births to parents from 'inferior' blood stocks ('birth control societies'.)  "Before the Auschwitz death camp became a household word, these British-American-European groups called openly for the elimination of the 'unfit' by means including force and violence." ** 

Since his ascendancy to the Presidency 459 days ago,  6559 healthy babies have been murdered as they were born.
The Negro Question:
  
..government and health care policies often discourage Black women from choosing life for their babies.. Abortion in the Black Community: Google's Index

.. Between 1882 and 1968, 3,446 Blacks were lynched in the U.S. That number is surpassed in less than 3 days by abortion.
1,452 African-American children are killed each day by the heinous act of abortion. 3 out of 5 pregnant African-American women will abort their child.
Since 1973 there has been over 13 million Black children killed and their precious mothers victimized by the U.S. abortion industry.
With 1/3 of all abortions performed on Black women, the abortion industry has received over 4,000,000,000 (yes, billion) dollars from the Black community.
..source: BlackGenocide.com Approximately 25% of the Negro population of the U.S. has been exterminated by abortionist$ since 1973 (Roe v Wade) The Inherent Racism of Population Control.  (src: tcrnews2.com) See also The Negro Project:  Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Plan for Black Americans.   (download "The Negro Project" in .pdf format, 66 ppg.) 

Black Leader Says Abortion Continues to Diminish African-Americans Quotes, "In our quest for higher education, bigger houses, better jobs and flashier cars are we closing our eyes to the fact that more than a thousand of our children die each day by the horrible practice of abortion?" she asked.  "These children are denied their most basic human right -- which is the right to life; a right which our ancestors so proudly worked for, marched for and many of them died for," Gardner added. (by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor, 7Feb07) 

Equating abortion with genocide is well founded.  Many are unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Sanger’s “Negro Project,” the eugenic plan to limit - or exterminate - the black and other “unfit” races.

Examples: Black Genocide, The Black Woman's Voice, Black Americans for Life, History of Abortion & the Black Community, Abortion Hurts Our Community, The New Civil Rights Movement, Abortion and the African-American Community (Hispanic vrs African demographics, birth rates), 10 Reasons to Boycott the NAACP, Abortion and the African-American: Is it Genocide?, The Abortion Industry and Planned Parenthood -- A Partnership in Death?, 


.. excerpts: Planned Parenthood’s founder and matriarch, Margaret Sanger in the 1930s ingeniously promoted her ideology that the "unfit" should be prevented from reproducing, "by force if necessary." Since the economic plight of many Blacks placed them and their families in the position of living in an environment that Sanger believed breed "unfit" individuals, her organization zeroed in on the "Negro" population.  Establishing the "Negro Project," Sanger and her cohorts set out to push their birth control agenda which as she writes "is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives" (The Pivot of Civilization written by M. Sanger)

In November 1939 a "Negro Project" leader feared that the project would be in "a great danger" of failing because "the Negroes think it a plan for extermination." Therefore, "let’s appear to let the colored run it ...." (Gamble memo "Suggestions for Negro Project" excerpted from pamphlet issued by the African American Committee, A.L.L.) Sanger later wrote him back saying, "We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population ..." She goes on saying that use of the Negro minister would effectively "straighten ... any rebellious members." (Letter from Sanger to Gamble, excerpted from pamphlet issued by the African American Committee, A.L.L.) 

Equating abortion with genocide is well founded.
Many are unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger’s “Negro Project,” the eugenic plan to limit — or exterminate — the black and other “unfit” races.

---

[An agenda devoted to the elimination of "defectives," "minorities", "inferiors," and the "unwanted." 

(quote source: "Cloning of the American Mind" : Eradicating Morality Through Education 1998 B. K. Eakman) ]

Today, national socialist activist propaganda [cloaked as democratic liberalism] often targets so-called "hate-mongers", either as a group or individually.   This propaganda seemingly targets only those right-of-center particularly targetting Pro-Life advocates as though they are 'anarchists' and the propagandist$ attack with rabid zeal anyone who 'has the audacity' to publicly question the "reproductive rights" bias of socialists who endeavor to keep hidden from the public, their victims, and the light-of-day the true motive of abortionist$, money.   However; there is a courageous few, like The Christian Gallery News Service - Abortion Cams,  Operation Rescue's Abortion Death Camps, AbortionIsMurder.com and Partial Birth Abortions, who help to expose the butcher$' evil to all who aren't cowering behind pro-death neo-socialist rhetoric.  Media regularly "accuses" defenders of life as being "right wing extremists" in print, audio, and video news.  It rarely, if ever, shows the 'death mills' and the horrid results of the atrocities committed within them.

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books+Federalist Papers	History+Documents	Quotations+American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath "Scots Wha Hae"	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution+more Amendments