o'forward - communist & socialists: Vpered & Vorwaerts "If it quacks like a duck..." + videos

Evans Law of Inadequate Paranoia:
"No matter how bad you think something is, when you look into it, it's always worse." -- M. Stanton Evans,
author "Black Listed by History, The Untold Story of Senator Joseph McCarthy" (published 2007)
source: http://harrolds.blogspot.com/2010/08/commiecrat-party-senator-joseph.html

---

COMMUNISM "The Big Lie"

US Army (MCMLI, 1951) [19m33s]

Uploaded to Youtube by aReaganDesignee on Jan 28, 2011

---

New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism

by Victor Morton, Washington Times, 30Apr12

article source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/apr/30/new-obama-slogan-has-long-ties-marxism-socialism/

     The Obama campaign apparently didn't look backwards into history when selecting its new campaign slogan, "Forward" - a word with a long and rich association with European Marxism.

     Many Communist and radical publications and entities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries had the name "Forward!" or its foreign cognates.  Wikipedia has an entire section called "Forward (generic name of socialist publications)."

     "The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology.  It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other left-wing newspapers and publications," the online encyclopedia explains.

     The slogan "Forward!" reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism.

     The Obama campaign released its new campaign slogan Monday in a 7-minute video.  The title card has simply the word "Forward" with the "O" having the familiar Obama logo from 2008.  It will be played at rallies this weekend that mark the Obama re-election campaign's official beginning.

     There have been at least two radical-left publications named "Vorwaerts" (the German word for "Forward"). One was the daily newspaper of the Social Democratic Party of Germany whose writers included Friedrich Engels and Leon Trotsky.   It still publishes as the organ of Germany's SDP, though that party has changed considerably since World War II.  Another was the 1844 biweekly reader of the Communist League. Karl Marx, Engels and Mikhail Bakunin are among the names associated with that publication.

     East Germany named its Army soccer club ASK Vorwaerts Berlin (later FC Vorwaerts Frankfort).

     Vladimir Lenin founded the publication "Vpered" (the Russian word for "forward") in 1905.  Soviet propaganda film-maker Dziga Vertov made a documentary whose title is sometimes translated as "Forward, Soviet" (though also and more literally as "Stride, Soviet").

     Conservative critics of the Obama administration have noted numerous ties to radicalism and socialists throughout Mr. Obama's history, from his first political campaign being launched from the living room of two former Weather Underground members, to appointing as green jobs czar Van Jones, a self-described communist.

(not to mention...his parents, his step-father, his grandparents, his mentor, his friends, his supporters, his czars, his advisors, and those he sought out as a student - rfh)

---

Alan Keyes rightly calls Obama a radical communist - YouTube
? 4:02? 4:02	www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DlTgrMCxPg Feb 21, 2009 - 4 min - Uploaded by keyes2008 Alan Keyes was a featured speaker at a fundraiser for the Triple A Crisis Pregnancy Center in Hastings ...

---

o'street organizer - Prepare: Labor Gearing Up to "Take What's Theirs."

From: Lee Bellinger  Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 Subject: Disturbing Signs Union Bosses Intend to Feast on Americans

Big Labor Bosses Gearing Up to "Take What's Theirs" – LOOK OUT!

     With housing market continuing to sink, most people are coming to grips with the reality that America's "good old days" of consumer-driven debt consumption funded by rising home values aren't coming back.
     And with most manufacturing, energy production, and other job-creating opportunities smothered under an ocean of regulations, the private sector simply cannot reinvent itself with the creation of new industries or products.
     So get ready, millions of Americans will probably end up working instead for Uncle Sam – not just by digging holes and filling them in, but also through grand construction projects that will be the modern-day equivalent of constructing pyramids for the ruling elite.
Should Workers Need Permission from Union Bosses to Get a Job?
     As state-level finances continue to deteriorate around the country, the White House is pushing yet another "jobs bill" that will spawn a number of construction projects and other make-work programs to "create jobs."
     While this legislation is dead on arrival up on Capitol Hill, some version is likely to eventually pass – especially as it becomes clear that the private sector can't and won't hire millions of workers anytime soon.  At some point, Democrats will elicit GOP support for launching new infrastructure projects.
     Which means that if most ordinary Americans want a chance at getting one of these politically created jobs, they had better be unionized.   Because it's Big Labor that construction projects funded by the central government primarily benefit (except where the bidding firm is owned by a woman, disabled veteran, or favored minority).
Big Labor vs. the Unemployed: Get Ready for Fireworks

     Enter the problem of union violence and intimidation being added to the causes of rising social chaos.   Earlier this month, union militants in Washington State reacted violently when a Port of Longview company hired workers who simply belonged to another union.
     Five hundred union hotheads forced their way into the Port of Washington.   The six security guards on duty were no match for the sheer number of union "protesters."   Before the raid was over, the union agitators broke windows, spilled grain supplies due to be shipped, and cut train brake lines to endanger the lives of rail workers and the public at large.
Rising Discontent Encourages Union Thugs to Attack Enemies
     Union bosses make up a powerful lobbying group, feel a tremendous sense of entitlement, and tend to react angrily when they don't get to call the shots.   And they have a virtual army of union activists who will do the union bosses' bidding of taking to the streets.   Get them stoked with beer and angry talk, and violence will often result.
     We're already starting to see events that foreshadow the coming societal and economic breakdown.   The violent union protest in Longview, Washington is just one example.
     Today, I'm going to tell you why you need to take notice of union militancy and how it can hit you right in the pocketbook.
Are We Headed for a Big Labor Showdown?
     When the social order starts to collapse, you can bet the big unions in this country – especially the government unions – won't sit idly by.   Union bosses will stir the pot to try to make things come out in their favor.   I've already mentioned the recent Longshoremen Union mayhem in Washington State, but there's more:
     At a Labor Day rally, AFL-CIO President Jimmy Hoffa incited union activists to prepare for a war and to "take these sons of bitches out," referring specifically to people calling for smaller government and more political transparency.
     In the spring of this year, Wisconsin union bosses turned to intimidation and threats to try to prevent the passage of a bill that would limit their special privileges.
     During the 2010 election season, several news accounts documented SEIU thugs intimidating and assaulting voters who spoke in support of candidates not endorsed by Big Labor.
     In many cities, close ties between organized labor and the political system are largely responsible for strapped budgets.  The largest single factor is the bloated, defined-benefit pension plans that commit the taxpayers for decades to trillion-dollar obligations.   Wasteful work rules, featherbedding, and pointless bureaucratic jobs that can never be cut are other factors.
     As private-sector jobs become more scarce and local and state budgets get stretched thin, you can bet that union bosses will resist cuts in government with all they have.
You can count on more violent protests and other ugly intimidation as the economy gets worse.   But that's not all you need to be concerned about.   You also need to keep a close eye on your wallet.
If the Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease... It's Time We Started Squeaking
     You and I need to pay attention to the effects organized labor is having on the political system, the economy, and even on the social order.   Of course, you're a savvy, informed reader, so I know you already do pay attention.   But, make sure you start following union disruptions in the news.   If they are carrying signs and chanting slogans today, they could be wielding crowbars and storming buildings tomorrow.
     Also watch how politicians treat the union bosses, watch for laws that union officials favor or oppose... and watch the extreme reactions when they don't get their way.
     Expect schools, hospitals, fire stations, and other public services increasingly to be held ransom to union-boss demands.
     And start voting with your dollars.  You might decide you don't want to avoid doing business with unionized companies.
     Also, start identifying products and services you use that could be at the mercy of union disruptions.  Foodstuffs are a big one here.  Union officials hold a lot of sway over shipping and trucking, and they could easily disrupt the flow of food supplies... at least temporarily.  (Nationwide transportation strikes happen routinely in France, for example.)   I've said it before, but it bears repeating: If you don't already have a 90-day supply of food on hand, now is the time to start stocking up.
     Finally, let other people know what you think.  When there's controversy, it's easy to clam up and keep your opinions to yourself.  But, we owe it to the future of our economy and our society not to be silent.
     Keep an eye out for your next Ready-for-Anything Report.  Each week, I bring you new information about the growing threats to your money, to your lifestyle, and to your health and comfort, so that you can be prepared for what's coming.  Stay tuned...
     Yours in Preparation, Lee Bellinger, Publisher -- Independent Living and Money, Metals, and Mining

---

Sponsored Message from Independent Living Bullion © 2009-2011 Lee Bellinger's Executive Bulletin, a free supplemental email newsletter to Independent Living.  377 Rubin Center Drive • Suite 203 • Fort Mill, SC • 29708 • (877) 371-1807 Click Here to Learn How to Add Lee Bellinger's Executive Bulletin to Your Email Address Book!  This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information in this email is presented for general educational purposes only. Because we don't know enough about readers' personal situations, the opinions expressed here should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument at any time. We will not be responsible for financial decisions that readers make, and they should be made in consultation with their own advisers.

---

o'union - "For Me, for me, for me, ...the power!" (video 1m2s)

video source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_profilepage&v=QaSnDrZNEg8 source: Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies (GPS) http://www.crossroadsgps.org

image source: http://www.cafepress.com/+Union+t-shirts

intimidation, force, coercion, death threats, bullying, union thugs, anarchy, chaos, disorder, violent overthrow of the government, putsch, greed, corruption, left wing, democrats, progressive socialisim, closed shop, street justice, Da Da Movement,

---

o'regulator - You won’t believe this! Number of new laws! (video 1m23s)

From: burd Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 Subject:  You won't believe this!

One minute clip--you won't believe it.  No matter what you think about Glenn Beck, watch this.  He is just the messenger here.  There is no commentary.  Its only one minute long.  And we wonder why OUR government is out of control?!  If you cherish what freedom you have left, then watch this.  STOP and THINK about it.

"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped."
"The acid test of intelligence is its ability to deal with stupidity".

---

o'ppeasement - End of the USA (Charles Krauthammer)

From: kd Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010

     PLEASE READ....A great article and all true...KD

                 Krauthammer: The fruits of weakness...

"The fruits of weakness"

By Charles Krauthammer © 2010 The Washington Post Company, Friday, May 21, 2010; A19 


It is perfectly obvious that Iran's latest uranium maneuver, brokered by Brazil and Turkey, is a ruse. Iran retains more than enough enriched uranium to make a bomb. And it continues enriching at an accelerated pace and to a greater purity (20 percent). Which is why the French foreign ministry immediately declared that the trumpeted temporary shipping of some Iranian uranium to Turkey will do nothing to halt Iran's nuclear program.

It will, however, make meaningful sanctions more difficult. America's proposed Security Council resolution is already laughably weak -- no blacklisting of Iran's central bank, no sanctions against Iran's oil and gas industry, no nonconsensual inspections on the high seas. Yet Turkey and Brazil -- both current members of the Security Council -- are so opposed to sanctions that they will not even discuss the resolution. And China will now have a new excuse to weaken it further.

But the deeper meaning of the uranium-export stunt is the brazenness with which Brazil and Turkey gave cover to the mullahs' nuclear ambitions and deliberately undermined U.S. efforts to curb Iran's program.

The real news is that already notorious photo: the president of Brazil, our largest ally in Latin America, and the prime minister of Turkey, for more than half a century the Muslim anchor of NATO, raising hands together with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the most virulently anti-American leader in the world.

That picture -- a defiant, triumphant take-that-Uncle-Sam -- is a crushing verdict on the Obama foreign policy. It demonstrates how rising powers, traditional American allies, having watched this administration in action, have decided that there's no cost in lining up with America's enemies and no profit in lining up with a U.S. president given to apologies and appeasement.

They've watched President Obama's humiliating attempts to appease Iran, as every rejected overture is met with abjectly renewed U.S. negotiating offers. American acquiescence reached such a point that the president was late, hesitant and flaccid in expressing even rhetorical support for democracy demonstrators who were being brutally suppressed and whose call for regime change offered the potential for the most significant U.S. strategic advance in the region in 30 years.

They've watched America acquiesce to Russia's re-exerting sway over Eastern Europe, over Ukraine (pressured by Russia last month into extending for 25 years its lease of the Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol) and over Georgia (Russia's de facto annexation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia is no longer an issue under the Obama "reset" policy).

They've watched our appeasement of Syria, Iran's agent in the Arab Levant -- sending our ambassador back to Syria even as it tightens its grip on Lebanon, supplies Hezbollah with Scuds and intensifies its role as the pivot of the Iran-Hezbollah-Hamas alliance. The price for this ostentatious flouting of the United States and its interests? Ever more eager U.S. "engagement."

They've observed the administration's gratuitous slap at Britain over the Falklands, its contemptuous treatment of Israel, its undercutting of the Czech Republic and Poland, and its indifference to Lebanon and Georgia. And in Latin America, they see not just U.S. passivity as Venezuela's Hugo Chávez organizes his anti-American "Bolivarian" coalition while deepening military and commercial ties with Iran and Russia. They saw active U.S. support in Honduras for a pro-Chávez would-be dictator seeking unconstitutional powers in defiance of the democratic institutions of that country.

This is not just an America in decline. This is an America in retreat -- accepting, ratifying and declaring its decline, and inviting rising powers to fill the vacuum.

Nor is this retreat by inadvertence. This is retreat by design and, indeed, on principle. It's the perfect fulfillment of Obama's adopted Third World narrative of American misdeeds, disrespect and domination from which he has come to redeem us and the world. Hence his foundational declaration at the U.N. General Assembly last September that "No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation" (guess who's been the dominant nation for the last two decades?) and his dismissal of any "world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another." (NATO? The West?)

Given Obama's policies and principles, Turkey and Brazil are acting rationally. Why not give cover to Ahmadinejad and his nuclear ambitions? As the United States retreats in the face of Iran, China, Russia and Venezuela, why not hedge your bets? There's nothing to fear from Obama, and everything to gain by ingratiating yourself with America's rising adversaries. After all, they actually believe in helping one's friends and punishing one's enemies.

letters@charleskrauthammer.com

---

o'ship-of-fools - 1st Year: "In his own words." (FoxNews.com Jan10) Is this what you voted for?

Is this what you voted for? Remember in November:  2010 and 2012

Buckfarack January 23, 2010 

Playlist on Youtube.com:  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_2eUGM6z9Y&feature=PlayList&p=A69DFAAC0A2CCC9F&index=0&playnext=1

Part 1 of 7	Part 2 of 7
Part 3 of 7	Part 4 of 7
Part 5 of 7	Part 6 of 7
Part 7 of 7	'Fox News Reporting' examines his fast-track rise from the Illinois legislature to the White House and the promises of hope and change he made along the way. Obama has pushed for big change and has taken aim at the Bush presidency, but he's also continuing some policies he once attacked as mistakes.

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books	History Links	Quotations: American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution + more Amendments

o'humpty dumpty - Obama is a liability: o'nocchio, the SPLC, international communism, Capone & the "choir boys"

emphasis added - rfh

From: gg Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009

Not near enough or soon enough! GG

I did not write it, I am just passing it along.  I pass it, you decide.

This is a powerful article appearing in the Canada Free Press.  A lot of analysis here and some scary dialog. JB Williams is a business man and a no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy.  He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world.

Obama's Well Organized Community Is Falling Apart:  Obama has now become a noose around the neck of every American Democrat! 

By JB Williams, Tuesday, August 18, 2009

It's now official: The average American is not as stupid as Washington DC Democrats and their international leftist friends thought. Their mystery messiah has already gone from hero to zero after only seven months in power, and Obama has now become a noose around the neck of every American Democrat, and every international fascist who "hoped" Obama could usher in Marxist "change."

Nobody can organize a community like a good old fashioned communist thug can.  It worked long enough to put a mystery man in the Oval Office, thanks to international socialists working through CPUSA - SPUSA and DSAUSA, funded by literally hundreds of leftist front-groups operating as special interest 527 organizations.  Here's a short list of the BIGGEST leftist front groups:

America Coming Together
Joint Victory Campaign 2004
Media Fund
Service Employees International Union
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
MoveOn.org
New Democrat Network
Sierra Club
EMILY's List
AFL-CIO
League of Conservation Voters.

Who spends an obscene $1 billion dollars to win a lousy $400,000 per year job, and why?   The people behind Obama expect a return on their investment.  And they are NOT the kind of folks you want to disappoint: These folks make Capone look like a choir boy.

Before the ink was dry on Obama's fake Certification of Live Birth (not to be confused with an actual birth certificate), Obamanation was off to confiscate control of banking, insurance, energy and auto manufacturing. Before they knew what was happening, the American people woke up, the proud new owners of Government Motors and $13 Trillion in debt.

But it wasn't until Obamanation tried to confiscate control of 1/7th of the US economy by nationalizing the private American health care industry that the people took to the streets in protest.

On the heels of dozens of angry Town Hall meetings turned public tar-and-feathering parties for countless career DC bureaucrats, Obama and his Democrat partners in crime found themselves in a historic freefall from popularity among average American taxpayers.  Eight months into office, Obama has bounced Jimmy Carter from his famous position as America 's worst president.

The people behind the puppet in our Oval Office did what leftists always do. They over-estimated themselves, under-estimated the American people, and over-played their hand. They actually thought that Americans would sit quiet as unbridled leftists trampled all over 300 million Americans.

That was the good news. As Obama becomes an anvil chained around the neck of DC and international leftists, he becomes a liability to their agenda.  These folks have an interesting way of dealing with political liabilities.

Losing control of their agenda and, in a power-slide towards the bottomless pit of political has-beens, Democrats are desperate to keep their international friends at bay.  But at the same time, being career politicians always focused on self-preservation; they must find a way to get re-elected by people ready to lynch them in Public Square.

Obama has foolishly allowed himself to be pushed into a no-win position, in his unlikely quest to "make history" by becoming the first "black" mystery messiah allowed to sit at the big desk with his finger on the red button.  In short, he's in way over his head, just as many worried would be the case with a freshman politician complete with blank resume.  Nancy "crazy as an out-house rat" Pelosi is no help, and Harry Reid is headed for the political boneyard no matter what.

Teddy Kennedy was in no position to lead the young lad out of the woods, and wannabes like Chucky Schumer and Bawny Fwank will soon be looking for an escape hatch of their own.  Time to Bring in the Heavy Artillery and Circle the Wagons.

Since Obama just won't become the "transparent president" he tricked so many voters into voting for, the issue of his constitutional conflict won't go away.  $1.35 million in legal defense fees later, the demand to see proof that he passes Article II requirements is getting louder.

Despite around the clock media efforts to paint every constitutionally conscious American a "right-wing racist Timothy McVeigh," the people seem only further agitated by the leftist suggestion that NO American citizen has "proper standing" to question their employees (elected representatives) on even the most fundamental questions.

Obama's problem with Americans isn't the mulatto color of his skin.  It's the bright RED color of his belief system and agenda.  He is undoubtedly making mentors like Saul Alinsky, Frank Marshal Davis and Bill Ayers quite proud.  But he is clearly losing the support of many Americans in that effort.

Before the dissent gets any wider spread, they have to do something.  Out of nowhere comes Obama's "experts" on national security, the Southern Poverty Law Center.  At the time of SPLC's founding, Julian Bond, who currently chairs the NAACP, was named the fledgling group's first President.

On the basis of these folks, Obama's Department of Homeland Security issued a "Right-wing Extremist" threat analysis, labeling every American with a gun or bible, or willing to publicly oppose Obama, a "potential domestic terrorist."

Yesterday, British newspaper, The Independent, published a story titled, "The right-wing crackpots taking over the mainstream," in which British leftist writer Rupert Cornwell proceeds to assault all American citizens who are currently speaking out against Obama's "global" agenda, and warns of coming civil unrest, and of course, his authority on the matter is the Southern Poverty Law Center.

From the report, one SPLC official says, "every element is in place for a 'perfect storm' of home-grown extremism.  For the first time, the detested federal government is run by a black man."  There ya have it!  That was easy! It's all about the "black man!"

"A struggling economy fuels discontent, with illegal immigrants accused of stealing American jobs." Or is it that unemployment has doubled to the highest level since the great depression, under the "black mans" brief administration?

"The military, long a breeding ground of the far right, is sending home veterans in vast numbers." Yes, those crazed military veterans:  And don't forget: "Finally there is the internet, which simultaneously propagates and intensifies the feelings of true believers and the conspiracy theories they devour."  The so-called "birthers" have made headlines all over the world?

Clearly, Cornwell received his talking points memo from David Axelrod, who obviously got his from the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Observer got the memo too, and they wasted no time attacking every American at odds with Obama's agenda.  It's American Patriots against the world, or at least the leftists of the world.  Cornwell concludes, "So might not elements even further to the right enter the fray - 'sovereign citizens' who believe they are above the law, or the new 'Oath Keepers' movement, of soldiers and police officers past and present, who believe their duty is to the constitution, not to elected politicians?  Perhaps the healthcare rallies and the SPLC report were no coincidence, after all."

Well, let me just say that I think Obama's life could, in fact, be in danger, but not from Tea Party protesters, Town Hall protesters or so-called "birthers." All of these folks are well aware of the reality that assassinating the first "black" president would be counter-productive to their agenda.

The Obama press has been burning the midnight oil trying to make certain that Hillary Clinton's "right-wing conspiracy" ghosts were set up to take the fall for any misfortunate event that might befall an increasingly unpopular president. No "right-winger" is likely to even break wind in Obama's direction.

His leftist international friends are quite another story however: These are BIG buck, BIG socialism folks who play by no particular set of rules, like George Soros. As Obama becomes more of a liability than an asset to their cause, it is his own people who are most likely to make a martyr out of the mystery messiah.

In the British Observer, writer Paul Harris is even more extreme in his column: Fears for Barack Obama's safety as healthcare debate fuels extremism; and once again, we see the report from the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The stage is being set: If anything happens to Obama, the entire world has been put on notice that Americans opposed to socialism from a "black" nobody president who won't even release his birth records, are responsible.

This leaves the door wide open for Obama's own friends to commit the crime with impunity, as they have already placed the American patriots' finger-prints on the imaginary murder weapon. It would be the perfect crime blamed on the perfect right-wing storm. It's brilliant!

The leftist press around the world has already accused and convicted "right-wingers" of the murder. Talk about your grand conspiracy: Nobody does it better than the international leftist cabal.

But who is this Southern Poverty Law Center responsible for all of the recent "hate speech" aimed at constitutionally concerned American citizens opposed to bankruptcy-by-communism in America ?

In 2007, SPLC identified 888 separate "active hate groups" in the United States . Despite the events of 9/11 and an ongoing threat of additional terror strikes here and abroad, not one of the 888 "active hate groups" identified was Islamic.  Detroit , Michigan , had more violent killings than Iraq and Afghanistan combined, but none of the groups responsible for those killings made the list of 888.


Only white, capitalist, constitutionalist, Christian, pro-freedom, in other words, "right-wing extremists" made the list.  Black on white crime is not "hate."  Black on black crime is not "hate."  Muslim on Christian crime is not "hate."  According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, only white, Christian, capitalists opposed to Marxism and attending Town Hall meetings are guilty of "hate." That's what their report says, and everyone from Obama's DHS and FBI to England 's press has bought that report hook, line and sinker.

I too fear for Obama's life: But not from any of the people attending Tea Parties or Town Hall meetings in an effort to talk with their elected representatives. I fear that Obama's life is increasingly in danger from the very people who put him in power - The people he is currently failing, as the American people stand up to stop his secular socialist global agenda.

I am 100% opposed to the Obama administration and today's Democrat agenda. But I am here to tell you that the worst thing that could happen in America today is for Obama to be assassinated.  Every Obama opponent knows this. He would be safest if he were guarded around the clock by American conservatives opposed to his entire agenda.

Only his leftist partners around the world would benefit from his assassination. Their agenda would move forward unchallenged if anything were to happen to Obama or his family.  As his agenda meets with serious resistance at home, his puppet masters abroad will lose faith and eventually, their patience.

Only a freshman senator would have fallen for the trap Obama finds himself in today. He can't win: If he's very lucky, he can only live to tell about it one day.

Obama has spent an entire lifetime surrounded by some of the world's worst thugs.. If he is unable to move their agenda forward, his life will be at risk from within his own ranks.  However, the nation and the world will pay a heavy price, as both are being conditioned to blame it on average Americans who simply oppose all forms of intrusive tyrannical government.

As Obama's agenda is shut down by average Americans, his friends will turn on him. Liberals are already warning him not to back off on nationalized health care.  But the people are not going to allow it to go forward.

Even though I oppose everything Obama is and everything he stands for, I pray for his safety. You can bet your last dollar: his well organized community is falling apart as his agenda begins to crumble. They will be very motivated to ignite a second civil war as they watch their agenda die a brutal political death.

Nothing would ignite a second civil war faster than the assassination of Barack Hussein Obama. I can only pray that the Secret Service does not take their cues from the Southern Poverty Law Center.  If they are no better at understanding political security than British op-ed pages, Obama's life is indeed in danger. Not from so-called "right-wing extremists" angry over Obama's blatant disregard for the Constitution today. But from within his ranks, as those who placed him in power, become saddled with his failures.

---

o'who? - ObamaCare - WHY?

From: Socialism Alerts  Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009

O NO ObamaCare!

When I hear or read about Congress' new massive bureaucracy and the tax increases for government run socialized healthcare I shake my head and say
O NO ObamaCare!

I think you do to so I made this sticker to put everywhere on cars, windows, books.

Here are a few of the shocking ObamaCare (OC) health control facts that make me shake my head!

Seniors lose $500 Billion from Medicare - O NO ObamaCare!

Obama Lied Illegals are TAX exempt and get FREE care (Americans pay) - O NO ObamaCare!

You pay TAXES on Employer health care plans - O NO ObamaCare!

Uninsured forced to spend 20% of income to be insured - O NO ObamaCare!

Retired Union Members healthcare benefits get TAXED - O NO ObamaCare!

OC provided to ALL non US citizens, including illegals - O NO ObamaCare!

Illegals are 1/3 of all those covered in the OC plan - O NO ObamaCare!

OC has a $1,000,000,000,000 Trillion Tax Gap - O NO ObamaCare!

OC CANNOT BE PAID FOR without NEW TAXES - O NO ObamaCare!

OC adds more than $3000/yr of debt to every American - O NO ObamaCare!

NEW TAXES on Americans earning less than $250,000/yr - O NO ObamaCare!

56% Of All Americans oppose ObamaCare - O NO ObamaCare!

Americans PAY an additional estimated $3500/yr for coverage - O NO ObamaCare!

Government administration more costly than private insurance - O NO ObamaCare!

88 million Americans can LOSE private, employer coverage- O NO ObamaCare!

GOVT COMMITTEE decides treatments/benefits you get - O NO ObamaCare!

Mandatory! Governments control of your living wills - O NO ObamaCare!

Health Choices Commissioner will choose your OC Benefits- O NO ObamaCare!

Government sets Doctor's pay rates no specialists - O NO ObamaCare!

Cancer patient care rationing - O NO ObamaCare!

Government mandated Advance Care (Death) Planning - O NO ObamaCare!

Government RESTRICTIONS on Special needs children - O NO ObamaCare!

Congress gets lavish healthcare - O NO ObamaCare!

Congress gets No Coverage Limit care - O NO ObamaCare!

Congress gets No "Pre-Existing Condition" Clause - O NO ObamaCare!

What will STOP "ObamaCare"... is the ObamaCare CHART.

House Minority Leader John Boehner and other Republicans asked the Joint Economic Committee to draw up another chart the ObamaCare Chart.

To the average American, it looks like a maze that they'll have to navigate before receiving medical care. AND IT IS -- the parts in white already exist, and the colored boxes are the new entities, offices, requirements, reports, and subsidies the Democrats' bill would create.

Don't hold your breath. Once again, the Democrats are using their majority power like they're dictators, trying to keep the TRUTH from the American people and their Representatives in Congress. We MUST not let them succeed! That's why we've set up our site to enable you to send "blast faxes" to every single Senator and Representative on Capitol Hill, demanding that they read every line of the ObamaCare bill, look at every single detail exposed by this new chart, and KILL this new attempt at a government takeover of American healthcare!

Please don't delay -- Congress is in session right now, and if we don't stand up and FIGHT against the radical Left, there might be nothing left of the America we know and love for our children! Take action now!

Sincerely,
, Alan M. Gottlieb, Chairman, AmeriPAC

P.S. Rep. King has stood strong on the floor of the House in opposing ObamaCare, saying, "You can't understand this health care program if you read the print, but if you look at this chart on your screen, you will pick up the phone, and the American people will be scared enough, I think, to jam the phone lines again in field offices."

THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN! We need to completely overwhelm every single Congressman and Senator's office, DEMANDING that they look at the details of ObamaCare, and KILL THE BILL. But we need YOU to take action NOW to make it happen!

Please make checks payable to AmeriPAC: American Political Action Committee (AmeriPAC), PO Box 1682, Dept Code 3156, Bellevue, WA 98009-1682

Paid for by AmeriPAC, a federally-authorized and qualified multicandidate political action committee. Contributions to AmeriPAC will be used in connection with federal elections. Maximum contribution per individual per calendar year is $5,000. Contributions from foreign nationals and corporations are prohibited. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Socialism Alerts: 12500 N.E. Tenth Pl. - Bellevue, WA 98005 US

---

o'thief in the night - Senate Hides Obama Anti-Free Enterprise Czar Vote!

From: CDFE  Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009

 

Senate Hides Obama Anti-Free Enterprise Czar Vote!

Harris Sherman an extreme environmentalist CZAR nominated by Obama was confirmed in a quick vote by the Senate and is being hidden from Americans. Sherman is to be Obama's Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and the Environment.

A CDFE investigation revealed that the Senate public Congressional Record is hiding the vote. For some reason the vote is not being made public and is being hidden even from or by the Associated Press. How many Senators do not even know the vote happened?

Americans had no opportunity to examine the background of Sherman before or after his confirmation hearing. There are reasonable questions and issues that are being ignored as this new CZAR is pushed through the Senate. Obama and the Senate must reconsider the confirmation and STOP Sherman.

Sherman would have total control over 190 million acres of America - the size of Texas - as boss of the National Forests.

The Problem: National Forests aren't Parks, they're productive lands for energy from oil and natural gas, electricity from coal, strategic metals for our military and the machines that do our work, lumber and paper, farming and ranching, road-building material, hunting and fishing and much more.

FAX Obama And All 100 Senators - Tell Them to STOP Sherman!  https://secure.conservativedonations.com/cdfe_sherman/?a=3088

Sherman is a known enemy of what these federal lands are meant to supply:

National Forests Provide The Raw Materials That Keep Us Alive.

Obama's choice would make him the Czar of Economic Shutdown!

Harris Sherman gave confirmation testimony before the Senate Agriculture Committee on September 30, 2009.

NOW Confirmed ...He Is Being Hidden By The Senate.

He is currently the director of Colorado's Department of Natural Resources. He's powerful. Producers fear him. Why? He's been accused of "using his position to extort or shake down money from oil and gas firms to fund his wildlife studies in return for his office not opposing their permits. In effect, he set up a �pay to play' approval process for oil and gas permits under the Colorado Department of Wildlife." Sherman's office is simply for sale in Colorado if you have the money.

Sherman will be Obama's Rent-A-Czar for our National Forests.

Senator Saxby Chambliss (Georgia) Ranking Republican Member, Senate Agriculture Committee, warned: "Mr. Sherman, I've received letters and emails from Georgians about your appointment, and they raise concerns about your approach to managing federal, state and private lands."

Some of those emails accused Harris Sherman of giving anti-development environmental groups open-door "Greens Only" access to Sherman's office, an access not available to the general public or economic producers.

Is Sherman to be Obama's "Behind the Green Door" Czar for our National Forests?

Some of those emails accused Sherman of falsification of public comment documents with the help of green groups to stop economic projects by making it look like the public objected to economic development when the majority actually approved.

Is Sherman to be Obama's "We Lie and Cheat for the Greens" Czar for our National Forests?

Some of those emails accused Harris Sherman of working to tear out roads in government lands to eliminate all economic development and visitor use, as recommended in the "Clinton-Babbitt Roadless Rule" written by environmental groups in the 1990s.

Is Sherman to be Obama's "Lock 'Em Out and Shut 'Em Down" Czar for our National Forests?

Together, those emails accused Harris Sherman of being a multi-pronged threat:

• Obama's Czar for "No more American oil" Unless you pay to play.
  
• Obama's Czar for "No more American natural gas" Unless you pay to play.
  
• Obama's Czar for "No more American coal" Unless you pay to play.
  
• Obama's Czar for "No more American mining" Unless you pay to play.
  
• Obama's Czar for "No more American paper" Unless you pay to play.
  
• Obama's Czar for "No more American lumber" Unless you pay to play.
  
• Obama's Czar for "No more American ranching" Unless you pay to play.

Obama's choice would make Sherman Czar of Economic Shutdown in our National Forests causing shortages of oil, natural gas, electricity from coal, strategic metals for our military, lumber, paper, farming ranching, road-building material, hunting, fishing and increasing the cost of living in America. Our United States Senators know about these allegations of scandal and are doing nothing.

• No vetting.
  
• No investigation.
  
• No questioning - beyond Senator Chambliss' polite warning.
  
• No Public notice and a Hidden Senate Vote.
  
• NOTHING!

We need a storm of faxes to get Obama and the Senate's attention and stop this nomination! It's time for some brave Senators to call for reconsideration of the confirmation of Harris Sherman to be Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and the Environment.  It's time for bi-partisan action to reject this nominee! Thank you for considering this message. ,Ron Arnold, Executive Vice-President, Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, www.cdfe.org

Paid for by Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Contributions are tax deducible.

---

o'messiah - The Saints of Socialism and the Religion of Radicalism

October 23, 2009
http://wms.socialismalerts.com/blog_post/show/148
 

A magazine features a cover photo of Obama with a halo beaming behind his head in the likeness of the murals of medieval saints. Women faint on hearing his speeches. He delivers those speeches with lines and cadences borrowed from his mentor, a radical clergyman. “In a way Obama is standing above the country, above the world. He’s sort of god. He’s going to bring all different sides together,” proclaimed Newsweek editor Evan Thomas.
 
Barack Obama is of course a messiah, one of the latest in a long line of socialist messiahs, men whom socialists and liberals believed were meant to radically reform the world, to teach people to overcome selfishness and greed, and unite as one.

The phenomenon of the quasi-religious worship of Obama is only shocking to those who fail to understand that socialism is itself a religion. Henri de Saint-Simon, the French 18th century thinker who coined the term socialism, described it as “The New Christianity”. Like many early socialists he envisioned its ideas as a tool for returning to primitive Christianity. The famous 19th century historian Renan explicitly made the comparison, writing, “If you want to get an idea of what the first Christian communities were like, take a look at a local branch of the International Workingmen’s Association.” The Association is better known as the First International, one of whose members was Karl Marx.

The original name of the Communist party that Karl Marx would go on to head was The League of the Just, whose stated goal was, “the establishment of the Kingdom of God on Earth, based on the ideals of love of one’s neighbour, equality and justice”. The same essential principles sum up the ideals of the Religious Left today which define religion in terms of social justice. Of course the end result of this process wipes everything from the blackboard, including God and the Bible, which become nothing more than props for socialist preaching. And that is exactly what the religion of socialism looks like.

Communism simply rejected one god, in favor of human divinities worshiped for bringing social justice to mankind.

Communism was never atheistic, it simply rejected one god, in favor of human divinities worshiped for bringing social justice to mankind, Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and the whole gang of crimson murderers and thieves. These men formed cults of personality around them because they embodied the theology of socialism as a vital active work on earth. To socialist Christians they embodied the message of Jesus. To socialist Jews, the message of the prophets—stripped of anything but social justice.

But what sort of religion is socialism exactly? What drives and motivates it? Socialism views individualism as sinful and unity as the solution to human evils. The brotherhood of all men, a phrase that resounds from the French Revolution down to Saint-Simon and to the Bolsheviks, idealizes a collectivist struggle and tyranny under the guiding hand of the great socialists.

Saint Simon, the original socialist, did not envision the common man running things. Instead he foresaw socialism as being overseen by “Men of Science” who would direct the industrialists on how to run society for the benefit of all. Two centuries later, virtually the same dogma runs through the administration of Barack Obama, with its manifold Czars and Harvard graduates directing everything from banks to car companies.

They are the Saints of Socialism, presumed to know better by virtue of their commitment to socialism, just as nothing could be built in Communist China without crediting Mao’s red book as its inspiration, and Stalin was presumed to know all there was to know every field better than its practitioners. The supernatural competence credited to Obama by his supporters must be seen in that light.

The paradox of socialism is that it demands equality for all, and yet insists that the common man is completely unfit to make his own decisions. Their argument is that individual man is too flawed, too bent on seeking personal advancement and wealth, and too little given to considering the needs of society as a whole, a flaw that he can only overcome in concert with others as part of a larger organization dedicated to the betterment of man. That same line of propaganda runs through the talking points of every socialist agenda, from health care nationalization to environmentalism to multilateralism. One bad. Many good.

The religion of organization is the theology of socialism.

The religion of organization is the theology of socialism.

Only united toward common goals are men anything more than selfish hoarders. And since men individually are selfish, only transcendent individuals who can unselfishly see the larger vision and steer the world toward it, can be allowed to lead. Men who are “special”, who play the role of the transformative messianic figure, smashing political and economic obstacles to create a new world order.

Or as disgraced former Presidential candidate Gary Hart put it;

"He is in fact an agent of transformation. He is not operating on the same plane as ordinary politicians, and this makes him seem elusive to the conventional press and the traditional politicians. His instinct for the moment and the times is orders of magnitude more powerful than the experience claimed by others. Experience in the old ways is irrelevant experience. In an age of great transformation, experience of the past is worthless because it is a barrier to the breakthrough gesture…

The past is worthless, so the transformative figure need not have any actual qualifications. Experience is irrelevant because it is rooted in the past that is going to be demolished anyway. Who needs to know how many states there are or when Columbus sailed the ocean blue. In the brave new America, there will be no states and Columbus Day will be the new Nakba.

The idea of the transformative figure plays a key role for radicals, who often have tossed aside even liberal theology in favor of radicalism. Religion to them is social change, their saints were martyred while protesting for the oppressed, and their messiah is the avatar of social change, a man who shatters the links to the old ways, ushering in a new society and new ways of thinking.

Chris Matthews was not being obsequious when he proclaimed, “This is the New Testament”. He was literally having a socialist religious experience. One that many others in the media have experienced as well. When your religion is social change, the man who embodies that change is the messiah. His words are a New Testament, setting aside the old, in favor of the new. A new world order. Hope, and most of all change.

I have spoken mostly about Europe, but American radicalism also has a long history of creating such artificial manmade supernatural religions right down to the modern New Age movement. Spiritualism, promoted by liberal theologians in liberal Churches, once played a major role in America, tying in even the 19th century George Bush, one of the country’s most famous ministers, and the great, great grand-uncle of George W. Bush.

In the 19th century radical Quakers like Isaac Post, promoted the predecessors of Oprah, namely the Fox sisters or Ascha Sprague, who traveled around the country, appearing on stages and claiming to communicate with the spirit world. In the process they also promoted everything from evolution to feminism and abolitionism while picking the pockets of gullible audiences. Their publications boasted names such as Banner of Light and The People’s World.

While it is easy to dismiss Spiritualism as silly superstition today, in the 19th century they were known as Christian Rationalists, because they had essentially reduced religion to a science. And while that science was a collection of lunatic nonsense inspired by a man suffering from delusions, its premise denied the unknowable, replacing conventional theology, with one based on animism, spiritual transformation and social change—elements heavily present in the Oprah crowd today.

“We’re all here to come together – to appreciate our uniqueness and to treasure our diversity, and we’re here to evolve to a higher plane . . . The reason I love Barack Obama is because he is an evolved leader who can bring evolved leadership to our country.” Oprah Winfrey

The rhetoric is virtually the same, backed by the old Spiritualist notions that we are here to move on to a higher plane and a time of social transportation is here. Combined of course with socialism’s driving force, the evolved leader who can embody that social change.

The New Age movement was not a radical break with the past, no more than Oprah’s rebranded Tolle material is, both are successors of Spiritualism’s radical past. The original version of the Spiritualist’s Communion of Saints, in which the dead would return to uplift the living, has faded away. Along with the Fox Sisters knuckle rapping messages from the other side. But in its place has come environmentalism, which like Spiritualism fuses animism with radical politics, and is fed by the New Age movement.

The Spiritualists believed that the dead had returned with a message for mankind to cease its selfish ways and ascend to a new level. Environmentalists preach that the earth is alive and in peril, and calls on us to cease our selfish ways and ascend to a new way of living. Both mask supernatural dogma with a veneer of science. As absurd as Arthur Conan Doyle’s search for fairies might seem today, he believed that he was applying strict scientific methodology to an important issue, no more and no less so than any environmentalist today.

The common element is transformation. The theology of socialism is one that promises transformation through collective action. Change is its religious experience. And those who teach the masses to Hope for Change, for the great evolutionary revolution, are its saints and messiahs.

Obama’s finest speeches do not excite. They do not inform. They don’t even really inspire. They elevate. They enmesh you in a grander moment, as if history has stopped flowing passively by, and, just for an instant, contracted around you, made you aware of its presence, and your role in it. He is not the Word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh…

Obama is, at his best, able to call us back to our highest selves, to the place where America exists as a glittering ideal, and where we, its honored inhabitants, seem capable of achieving it, and thus of sharing in its meaning and transcendence Ezra Klein, THe American Prospect

It is doubtful that any spiritualist could have better expressed this same set of ideas. The idea of Obama as a force that elevates, that causes you to experience yourself as an agent of historical change and that finally teaches us to transcend by envisioning an ideal America as a socialist kingdom of heaven on earth, where no one is hungry or sick or discriminated against… and the government led by him takes care of us all.

Not the word made flesh, but the triumph of word over flesh. Flesh is weak. Needy, greedy and selfish. Socialism is doctrine triumphing over humanity, Orwell’s boot on the face of humanity, keeping us down for our own good. And if any of us have the gall to feel bad about it, that is where the preachers of the Socialist Word come in, to “inspire” and “elevate” us to be better cogs in the collectivist machine. To be agents of revolutionary social change.

We are the ones we have been waiting for. Hope and Change. Some must sacrifice for the good of all.

SocialismAlerts.com is a public service web site. Its purpose is to provide news and information about the Socialistic agendas emanating from Washington. Right now the Obama Administration is moving America towards Socialism through bailouts, health care reform, and skyrocketing taxes. The Obama Administration has also made efforts to silence the public's opposition to their plans by enacting the "flag@whitehouse.gov" e-tip program, and also by having radical, leftist groups like ACORN host town-hall meetings.

America needs to halt the Obama Administration's path to Change before it's too late.

---

o'commie - Oblama Communists attack Fox News & the 1st Amendment

From: kd Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009

     The arrogance of these communists knows no bounds....KD
...Urges rest of press to side with administration

---

White House Urges Other Networks to Disregard Fox News

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/18/white-house-escalates-war-fox-news-1925819282/

 

Senior Obama administration officials took to the airwaves Sunday to accuse Fox News of pushing a particular point of view and not being a real news network.

 

FOXNews.com, Monday, October 19, 2009

 

The White House is calling on other news organizations to isolate and alienate Fox News as it sends out top advisers to rail against the cable channel as a Republican Party mouthpiece.

 

Top political strategists question the decision by the Obama administration to escalate its offensive against Fox News. And as of Monday, the four other major television networks had not given any indication that they intend to sever their ties with Fox News. 

 

But several top White House officials have taken aim at Fox News since communications director Anita Dunn branded Fox "opinion journalism masquerading as news" in an interview last Sunday. 

 

White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel told CNN on Sunday that President Obama does not want "the CNNs and the others in the world [to] basically be led in following Fox." 

 

Obama senior adviser David Axelrod went further by calling on media outlets to join the administration in declaring that Fox is "not a news organization." 

 

"Other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way," Axelrod counseled ABC's George Stephanopoulos. "We're not going to treat them that way." 

 

Asked Monday about another Axelrod claim that Fox News is just trying to make money, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that while all media companies fall under that description, "I would say sometimes programming can be tilted toward accentuating those profits." 

 

But by urging other news outlets to side with the administration, Obama officials dramatically upped the ante in the war of words that began earlier this month with Dunn's comments. 

 

So far, none of the four other major networks has given any indication that they wish to disinvite Fox News from the White House pool -- the rotation through which the networks share the costs and duties of White House coverage and the most significant interaction among the news channels. 

 

The White House stopped providing guests to "Fox News Sunday" after host Chris Wallace fact-checked controversial assertions made by Tammy Duckworth, assistant secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, in August. 

 

Dunn said fact-checking an administration official was "something I've never seen a Sunday show do." 

 

"She criticized 'Fox News Sunday' last week for fact-checking -- fact-checking -- an administration official," Wallace said Sunday. "They didn't say that our fact-checking was wrong. They just said that we had dared to fact-check." 

 

"Let's fact-check Anita Dunn, because last Sunday she said that Fox ignores Republican scandals, and she specifically mentioned the scandal involving Nevada senator John Ensign," Wallace added. "A number of Fox News shows have run stories about Senator Ensign. Anita Dunn's facts were just plain wrong." 

 

Fox News senior vice president Michael Clemente said: "Surprisingly, the White House continues to declare war on a news organization instead of focusing on the critical issues that Americans are concerned about like jobs, health care and two wars. The door remains open and we welcome a discussion about the facts behind the issues." 

 

Observers on both sides of the political aisle questioned the White House's decision to continue waging war on a news organization, saying the move carried significant political risks. 

 

Democratic strategist Donna Brazile said on CNN: "I don't always agree with the White House. And on this one here I would disagree." 

 

David Gergen, who has worked for Democratic and Republican presidents, said: "I totally agree with Donna Brazile." Gergen added that White House officials have "gotten themselves into a fight they don't necessarily want to be in. I don't think it's in their best interest." 

 

"The faster they can get this behind them, the more they can treat Fox like one other organization, the easier they can get back to governing, and then put some people out on Fox," Gergen said on CNN. "I mean, for goodness sakes, you know, you engage in the debate. 

 

"What Americans want is a robust competition of ideas, and they ought to be willing to go out there and mix it up with some strong conservatives on Fox, just as there are strong conservatives on CNN like Bill Bennett." 

 

Bennett expressed outrage that Dunn told an audience of high school students this year that Mao Zedong, the founder of communist China, was one of "my favorite political philosophers." 

 

"Having the spokesman do this, attack Fox, who says that Mao Zedong is one of the most influential figures in her life, was not...a small thing; it's a big thing," Bennett said on CNN. "When she stands up, in a speech to high school kids, says she's deeply influenced by Mao Zedong, that -- I mean, that is crazy." 

 

Fox News contributor Karl Rove, who was the top political strategist to former President George W. Bush, said: "This is an administration that's getting very arrogant and slippery in its dealings with people. And if you dare to oppose them, they're going to come hard at you and they're going to cut your legs off." 

 

"This is a White House engaging in its own version of the media enemies list. And it's unhelpful for the country and undignified for the president of the United States to so do," Rove added. "That is over- the-top language. We heard that before from Richard Nixon." 

 

Media columnist David Carr of The New York Times warned that the White House war on Fox "may present a genuine problem for Mr. Obama, who took great pains during the campaign to depict himself as being above the fray of over-heated partisan squabbling." 

 

"While there is undoubtedly a visceral thrill in finally setting out after your antagonists, the history of administrations that have successfully taken on the media and won is shorter than this sentence," Carr wrote over the weekend. "So far, the only winner in this latest dispute seems to be Fox News. Ratings are up 20 percent this year." 

 

He added: "The administration, by deploying official resources against a troublesome media organization, seems to have brought a knife to a gunfight."

---