2nd Amendment - WARNING: "It couldn't happen here! ... It did." Disarming America as UK/AU/CA/JP "It couldn't happen here! ... It did." (10 videos)

Remember in November:  Senators Boxer, Dodd, Feinstein, Hatch, Kohl, Lautenberg, Levin, Schumer, Specter and Representatives Filner, Pelosi, McCarthy

[ related, 'Gun Control' terms/definitions at http://www.issues2000.org/Background_Gun_Control.htm + links to 2010 candidates' 2nd Amendment records via http://www.issues2000.org/Domestic/Barbara_Boxer_Gun_Control.htm & All Senators records. ]

It only took two weeks in Australia!!! • George Soros (o'who?'s puppetmaster) and Soros' IANSA is now infiltrating the U.S. actively working to disarm YOU ... ALL civilians! • George Soros conspires with United Nations to subvert the Second Amendment  / U.S. Constitution. • Would you shoot an American? ...Yeah.

[redux in context]

clip from the movie "The Pianist" -  It can happen here!  ..remember New Orleans, and the Ruby Ridge Massacre [a video], and the Waco Massacre [a video] ... video source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRPPUcfHczg&  feature=player_embedded

No ... I didn't forget Waco ... nor should you.

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books+Federalist Papers	History+Documents	Quotations+American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath "Scots Wha Hae"	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution+more Amendments

Warning: the Left’s subversive propensity for violence: communazi leftist o'bamastapo security forces' New Orleans violence reminicent of 'Kristallnacht '

Violence from the left in rhetoric and in street 'wilding' is beginning.  regardless of the details'  veracity ...the mere fact that news are reporting and common folk are beginning talk about and to have fears in the back of their minds about the 'street organizations' that are coming out of the 'wood work' to intimidate Americans ... is in itself sufficient to sound an alarm!  Other countries have found ways to controlled 'crazies.'  I don't think we want to 'shoot'em in the public square' nor can we accept socialist marxists 'fundamental transforming' of America.  We either get our act together and clean the snakes out of Washington or else we will be learning to speak Arabic, bowing to Mecca, or speaking Chinese and marching like so many have in times past when they lost their country to dictators and totaltarianism.   China will soon own the U.S., maybe a few more "scrape'n bows" from o'bow will slow down World dominance by the Chinese but I suspect his shenanigans draw many'a snicker behind the "Great Wall."   o'bamastapo's union instigators and 'street thugs' haven't got a clue what they're are getting into.  When the "Silent Majority" becomes "Silent No More" and o'juniors' minions face organized and determined Americans, they will flee like the rats they are.   If that fails, When The Red Flag comes over the horizon ... o'minions will be no more ... period.  ~~ rfh

• 
  
  
  http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/04/gop-official-boyfriend-savagely-beaten-for-wearing-palin-pins-including-broken-leg-jaw-concussion-media-silent/
• 
  
  
  GOP Official & Boyfriend Savagely Beaten In Politically Motivated Attack – Including Broken Leg, Jaw, Concussion… Media Silent …
• 
  
  
  http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/13/a-cautionary-note-about-the-beating-in-new-orleans/
• 
  
  
  http://michellemalkin.com/2010/04/16/new-orleans-beating-follow-up-attackers-yelled-little-blonde-btch-fking-faggot-nothing-political/

 • Burning confirmed her daughter's leg is broken in four places and she has five surgical scars and a steel rod now running from her knee to her ankle with seven screws holding it all in place.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36559

The attack happened one week ago today as Bautsch and her boyfriend left a $10,000-per-plate Republican fundraiser at Brennan’s Restaurant in the French Quarter where a local group of anarchists, the Iron Rail Collective, were among radical leftist groups that organized a protest outside.  Attendees had to run a gauntlet of these aggressive protesters hurling slurs as they left the event.

---

April 15, 2010

Subversive political fraud (again): it's like old times for the hard left

WES VERNON, RA ANALYST — The radical anti-American left is going back to doing what it enjoys best: infiltrating and disrupting gatherings of patriotic Americans, as well as trying to discredit or undermine normal citizens so as to make them look like kooks... (more)

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books+Federalist Paper	History+Documents	Quotations+American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath "Scots Wha Hae	History of:  The US Bill of  Rights	Constitution + more Amendments

video source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr6ry465gdc

Glenn Beck discusses "Constitutional Rights" versus "government granted 'rights'."
Senator Tom Harkin describes the democrats plan for the healthcare bill, which is to move healthcare from a privilege to a right (or entitlement) that he describes as a starter home to which the democrats can make additions. Rights are endowed by God our creator, not by government, for government can take them away (what they are currently doing with our liberty)

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books	History+ Documents	Quotations: American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution + more Amendments

o'enemy of the state - Is President Obama a “foreign and domestic enemy” of America and its citizens?

reposted from http://markepstein.wordpress.com/2009/08/15/is-president-obama-a-foreign-and-domestic-enemy-of-america-and-its-citizens/

by Mark Epstein, 15Aug09

The Domestic Attack

The accusation that the Obama administration is “tone deaf” to American angst over health care reform is gaining more credence with each passing day. As President Obama continues talking instead of listening, as well as alienating the very industry whose support of reform is a necessity (and certain reforms are necessary, including tort reform), the president is spending too much time on the attack and, in so doing, provides his detractors with even more fodder. What is exacerbating the reported American anger toward the administration is that the president and his administration are making allegations without a shred of substantive evidence. In other words, people are put off by the obvious Chicago-style thuggery in the White House spin on the health care debate. The Obama administration is missing a golden opportunity to “hear” the America it claims to represent, instead of furthering the widely-held belief that Obama only represents radical leftists and their agenda for the country.

Simultaneously, we see President Obama behaving in the same manner as Iran’s president when it comes to the issue of the Fourth Estate’s First Amendment rights. Moreover, contravening Obama’s assertions to the contrary concerning the “Fairness Doctrine,” his appointment of Mark Lloyd as the Federal Communication Commission’s “Chief Diversity Officer” is a clear message to conservatives to beware, since Lloyd “laid out a ‘battle plan’ for liberal activists to target conservative talk radio stations in 2007.” When viewed in light of Obama’s comments, Pelosi’s accusations, the White House press secretary’s disinformation campaign attacking Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, the mainstream media’s reaction, other individuals holding the administration’s and congress’ feet to the fire on the issue of Obamacare, the use of swastikas by liberals, and the police interviewing a political dissenter there is certainly more evidence giving credence to conservative fears than there is any basis for accusing insurance companies and other health care industry players of conspiring to block health care reform.

If we add the General Electric-owned MSNBC’s vilification of Americans into the equation — the very Americans responsible for providing GE $1 billion in stimulus money — and the White House email controversy, Americans have every right to worry that the current administration is out to stifle constitutionally-guaranteed dissent in its efforts to ram through a socialistic agenda. And then there’s the obvious disparity between the words and behavior of Obama’s supporters, Senator Reid, and Speaker Pelosi insisting that liberal dissent is permissible (even encouraged), but those who find fault with Obama’s agenda are “un-American,” “evil doers,” and “Nazis.” Although much could be written in addressing the left’s illogic, use of ad hominems, and pejoratives directed toward the majority of Americans (in lieu of substantive debate of the health care issue), it’s the overall behavior that speaks volumes and is worthy of close examination for similarities with historically totalitarian regimes.

Included in the concerns that Obama is behaving like a constitutionally-defined “domestic enemy” is the president’s inability to answer specific questions addressing the funding for health reform, while simultaneously giving tacit approval to the Orwellian mass emailings from the White House to Americans who’ve never contacted 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and whose private email addresses should not be found anywhere within the Executive Branch. There are legitimate concerns that the “snitch address,” flag@whitehouse.gov, is one of the methods the administration is using to pit Americans against one another, as well as to spy on Americans opposed to the administration’s agenda. As noted on several occasions at the raucous Town Hall meetings, Americans are upset over a number of issues, not just health care. Thus, Axelrod’s unsolicited email only fans the flames of distrust, which causes fear in many. A fear that Americans should not be experiencing. Instead, a healthy constitutional republic is one in which the government fears the people and the people’s representatives would never dream of conducting “back room” business or attempting to ram through a piece of legislation that only a minority of Americans fully support. The Obama administration’s arrogant behavior belies its stated transparency and willingness to represent the people. In essence, Obama and the Democrats are at war with the majority of Americans on a number of “fronts” and it is reasonable to ask if current White House policy is deliberately designed to undermine our constitutional republic.

Big Brother Is Watching

The Foreign Attack

Since the beginning of the 20th Century, America has not engaged in any major conflict without allied participation. Moreover, since the conclusion of World War II, our country has maintained strategic alliances to thwart expansion of countries whose ideologies are contrary to democracy, that espouse terrorism, or murder their own citizens when they disagree with the country’s leadership.

During the 2008 Presidential Campaign, then candidate Obama repeatedly refered to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a “cycle of violence.” Subsequent to his election, the Obama administration has renounced terminology that refers to our current wars as those that are combating terrorism and the totalitarian internal suppression of its people found within terroristic regimes. Additionally, the president has directed our Armed Forces to Mirandize enemy combatants, close the facility at Guantanomo Bay, Cuba, appeared to genuflect before the corrupt leader of Saudi Arabia, engaged the Iranians as though they were not enemies of world peace (despite Iran’s known involvement in destabilizing Iraq, exporting terrorism, and threatening to anniahlate our only ally in the Middle East), and the president has publicly renounced Christianity as the moral framework the Founding Fathers envisioned as the restraining borders to our republic running amok. Yet, despite inveighing against the previous administration’s policies in conducting the war on terrorism, the president continues them unabated and directs an expansion of the war in Afghanistan. Once again, the president’s behavior does not match his words, except in the case of our ally Israel, the Middle East’s and Southwest Asia’s only democracy.

Though the anti-Semitic behavior of the left is inexplicable from a rational and historically-informed standpoint, the president’s inability to distinguish between a terrorist that kills innocents and a democracy’s military protecting its citizens is cause for trepidation within our own borders. Moreover, the current domestic scene in which the left attempts to suppress free speech and terrorizes its own citizens with Orwellian emails underscores a like-minded approach reserved for dictatorships.

The administration’s approach to internal dissent coupled with a foreign policy embracing the leadership tactics of the terroristic and oppressive regimes of our sworn enemies (i.e., the “Death to America” crowd) is alarming. If we are to objectively analyze the totality of Obama’s actions, then we cannot disassociate the president’s foreign and domestic policies revealing his behavior toward the American people and our enemies — including continuing to lump in close to 12 million illegal non-Americans in his “46 million uninsured Americans” figure. Moreover, we cannot ignore the “top cover” the mainstream media provides the president, as it invents distractions to avoid real discussion of substantive issues germane to the overall debate of Obama’s domestic and foreign agendas.

To begin the analysis of Obama as a constitutionally-defined “foreign enemy” of the United States, we can ask a few simple questions. If your health care plan doesn’t include providing illegal aliens health coverage, then why does the number of uninsured still include them? Since we know that not all illegal aliens are Mexicans working in various low-paying jobs Americans supposedly do not want, then how will the plan distinguish between a Mexican residing in the US illegally from a terrorist who merely used a student visa to gain access to American soil? If the Taliban are not terrorists, then why are we prosecuting a war in Afghanistan? What’s the threat to our country? How can you reasonablly equate Palestinian terrorists who vow another country’s total destruction and the genocide of its people with the only democracy in the Middle East? Why do your public policies and public actions (behavior) embrace totalitarian regimes and why does your administration’s policies toward dissenters to Obamacare resemble the behavior of said totalitarian regimes?

Although the evidence may still be inconclusive as to whether the president is a “foreign enemy” of the United States, it is time to begin asking the question — without any reference to a birth certificate.

     The author, Mark Epstein, is an Orthodox Christian, single-parent (including a daughter with Rett Syndrome), veteran, retired Soldier, and biker who occasionally writes a post about religion, politics, sex, and anything else controversial. This blog is the author’s sometimes cheeky, sometimes serious, way of looking at the folly of the political left, the political right, and anyone else who enjoys making a complete fool of themselves as they seek to deny other Americans their constitutional rights.
     Unlike many so-called conservatives who think compromise with the enemies of our Constitutional Republic is acceptable, the author finds the power-mad, immoral, nanny-stater leftists (and their gutless ‘centrist’ pals) an affront to the Founding Fathers and founding principles of the United States. The only thing worse is a tax-and-spend RINO or Neo-Con.
     Although a libertarian at heart on many issues, abortion is not only morally reprehensible, it conflicts with fundamental tenets of all three of the Western Religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) and our country’s founding documents.
     Having “been there, done that” under four Commanders in Chief, been a witness to the life lost through political and moral compromise, and seen the results of leftist politics in various countries, the author recognizes that ideas have consequences.

Constitution Society: Founding Documents	Online Books	History Links	Quotations: American Values
TimeLine of: the Magna Carta	Declaration of Arbroath	History of: The US Bill of Rights	Constitution + more Amendments

Responsibilities of American Citizenship, The + Capitalism versus Socialism & Communism (1955)

Citizenship:

Capitalism:

These movies are part of the collection: Prelinger Archives at the

Producer: National Education Program
Sponsor: N/A
Audio/Visual: Sd, B&W
Keywords: Cold War; Citizenship, leftist, propaganda, communists, 5th Column, socialists, private vs government ownership, fellow traveler, American Republic, apathy, Freedom, The American Way, republic vs democracy, economics, profit, competition, Spiritual Growth, religion
Creative Commons license: Public Domain

---

"Treason" author: Ann Coulter (2003), a book review (pre-o'who?, recommended reading)

Book Review: Treason By Scott Editor, November 2003 | More Book Reviews

Ann Coulter's third consecutive #1 New York Times bestseller, Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism, hits liberals hard on two fronts: first by accusing them of pandering to Stalin and one of the most brutal Communist regimes in human history, and being weak on the current war on terror.

The theme is that liberals have throughout history sided with the enemy, or at least, whichever side is against the United States.  Going against the strong currents of academia and the historians that have long established Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy as a negative force in America who "destroyed lives and reputations" through his infamous "witch hunts," Coulter does the unthinkable by audaciously defending the late senator who spent his entire career in the Senate outing either Communists or Soviet sympathizers working in a sensitive top-secret positions.

For decades McCarthy has been labeled a liar by the mainstream media, and Coulter gleefully reprints excerpts from the New York Times and Washington Post and other sources that regarded McCarthy as a plague.

Coulter's rebuttal is quite strong, however, thanks to a top-secret Army project that was declassified in 1995 called the Venona Project, a sequence of coded communications between the Soviets and the Americans that have long been accused by the House Un-American Activities Committee and ex-Communists like Whittaker Chambers.  McCarthy was hardly a player in exposing what was already known.

Thanks to Venona, it is now absolutely confirmed that Alger Hiss was a Soviet Spy, despite his prominence in the Truman administration (and he was convicted of perjury before McCarthy ever became a senator.)  Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, among many others, were guilty of treason.

"It is a fact that hundreds of agents of this blood-soaked ideology became top advisors to Democratic presidents ...Stalin's agents held top positions in the White House, the State Department, the Treasury Department, the Army, and the OSS.  Because of Democrat incompetence and moral infirmity, all Americans lived under the threat of nuclear annihilation for half a century.  As Soviet spies passed nuclear technology to Stalin, President Roosevelt gave strict orders that the OSS engage in no espionage against the country ruled by his pal, Uncle Joe" (pg 34).

Yet for the last fifty years many in the media (and of course many liberals) touted the innocence of all those accused of being sympathetic to the Soviets - the Venona Project truly is damning and speaks for itself.  You can read many of transcriptions for yourself on the Internet.

So naturally the negative reaction to Coulter's book lacks substance.  Aside from the usual ad hominem attacks (it's a book by Coulter...who defends McCarthy...so it must obviously be bogus), her critics go for the only angle she allows them to hit on; the "liberals are bad" point.  Instead of rebutting the facts - such as the one of minor importance: McCarthy was right - Coulter's critics label Treason an anti-liberal "screed," saying its only purpose is to attack liberals.

Despite mass accusations, including one surprising criticism from ex-Leftist David Horowitz of FrontPageMag.com, Ms. Coulter does not label all liberals and Democrats traitors, nor accuse them all of being guilty of treason.

Horowitz's main problem with Treason is that Coulter lumps all liberals together accusing them of all being pro-Communists traitors.  And to be sure, the book opens: "Liberals have a preternatural gift for striking a position on the side of treason.  You could be talking about Scrabble and they would instantly leap to the anti-American position.  Everyone says liberals love America, too.  No they don't.  Whenever the nation is under attack, from within or without, liberals side with the enemy."

Certainly this opening paragraph would make any liberal fume in disgust, not allowing Coulter any room for the hyperbole that makes her such an entertaining read.  But let's not got lost in our emotions; Coulter never levels a blanket charge on all Democrats.

In his critique, Horowitz blasts Coulter for not recognizing the anti-Communist Democrats: "Is it the case that liberals like Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson and John F. Kennedy sided with the enemy?  Of course not.  They were anti-Communists, hated by the left as “cold war liberals.”  And they were not alone.  There were many liberals – Scoop Jackson and Jeanne Kirkpatrick among them – who were just as worthy defenders of America and prosecutors of the anti-Communist cause."

Horowitz couldn't be any more correct, but next time he plans on criticizing a book it might serve him well to actually read it, for Coulter does not hide:  "There were, admittedly, a few rare and striking exceptions to the left's overall obtuseness to communist totalitarianism. The Democratic Party was certainly more patriotic then than it has become.  Throughout the sixties, the Democrats could still produce the occasional Scoop Jackson Democrat.  John F. Kennedy's pronouncements on communism could have been spoken by Joe McCarthy.  For all his flaws, Truman unquestionably loved his country.  He was a completely different breed from today's Democrats.  Through the years, there were various epiphanic moments creating yet more anti-communist Democrats.  The Stalin-Hitler pact, Alger Hiss' prothonotary warbler, information about the purges and Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's "The Gulag Archipelago" – all these had their effect" (pg 11).

The middle chapters are a tribute to Coulter's favorite president of the last century, the great Ronald Reagan.  Dispelling any theories arguing the Cold War was won by anybody but Reagan, Coulter exhaustively recounts the days of the Reagan administration and how his did what the predecessors couldn't: bring the Soviet Union to a total collapse.

Sticking to the treason theme, Coulter charges liberals with opposing all anti-Communism measures and for sticking up for the Soviets (remember FDR called Stalin "Uncle Joe") at every turn.

Coulter wonders if there's a double standard looking back at the regimes of Hitler's Nazi Party and Stalin's Soviet Party.  "In 2003, the New York Times cheerfully announced the introduction of a new, 'lighthearted' journal about Communism.  This is an ideology responsible for nearly 100 million murders, or -- as the Times put it -- a 'divisive' ideology. How about a 'lighthearted' journal about suicide bombings or Nazism, also 'divisive' ideologies?  Or must an ideology commit ten times the number of murders of Hitler's Nazi Germany before liberals call it lighthearted" (pg 191?)

Perhaps more people would be willing to celebrate McCarthy today if he blew the whistle on Americans who were in bed with the Nazis instead of the Soviets.  According to Coulter, liberals by their nature have just been sympathetic to the Soviets and Communism ...and she provides plenty of evidence and footnotes to back it up.

Lastly Coulter defends the War on Terrorism, and as most know, she's a major proponent of the Iraq War.  Here one can debate the effectiveness of the Bush administration, as Coulter spends much of her book making the point that wars are won with Republican presidents and lost with Democrat presidents.  Mr. Bush is seriously in danger of breaking the cycle, even if Coulter would never accept it.

It may be too early in history to judge the success of the war on terrorism.  We've got a long way to go and I have always been one to reserve judgment.  Coulter herself was wise not to skulk or devote too many pages to the current war, because she knew it wouldn't be over with the release of her book.

However the story of the Cold War is complete, and Coulter does a convincing job correcting the record and the legacy of Senator McCarthy.  To be sure, I'm not necessarily defending the guy.  I understand he was bullish (as were his critics equally on him.)  He used dirty campaign tactics.  And Coulter defends the embellishment of his war record, though she argues it wasn't as embellished as liberals would have you believe.

The point is McCarthy was a human being, and an obviously flawed one.  But Coulter only wants to know one thing despite whatever you want to say about the man or his methods: "Were there Soviet spies in the State Department?"  Interestingly, no one has yet to offer a substantially rebuttal to Coulter's pro-McCarthy tome.  Sure, there are plenty of attacks on her, and her general belief that liberals "strike the position of treason," but it's a telling sign when they only thing of Coulter's you can attack is her vocabulary choice.

Like it or not, the Venona cables confirm it all, on top of what was already available such as the testimony from ex-Communists, and the mounting evidence Coulter presents in her book.  But it's the Venona Project that speaks for itself, and one must wonder why the media ignored the 1995 declassification of it.  On second thought, considering the case Treason makes against the mainstream media, no wondering is needed at all.

---

o'bamastapo's Amerika - Commies, Marxists, Anarchists, Reds, Pinko Fellow Travelers, Socialists, Revolutionaries

..Obama's plan to silence the right wing..

..Barack Obama circle of radical associates..

How radical are the people currently running our government?

---

o'pied piper - Great Change? A Pied Piper story.

Original Message From: drude Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 Subject: Great Change?????????????????????????

There was a Pied Piper who said,
"We live in the greatest country in the world. Help me change it!"
*And the people said, Change is good!
Then he said, We are going to tax the rich fat-cats,
*And the people said, "Sock it to them!"
and redistribute their wealth..
*And the people said, "Show me the money!"
And then he said, Redistribution of wealth is good for everybody
*And Joe the plumber said, "Are you kidding me?"
And Joe's personal records were hacked and publicized.
*And one lone reporter asked, "Isn't that Marxist policy?"
And she was banished from the kingdom!
Then someone asked, "With no foreign relations experience, how will you deal with radical terrorists?"
And the Pied Piper said, Simple. I'll sit down and talk with them and show them how nice we really are and they'll forget that they ever wanted to kill us all!
Then the Pied Piper said, I'll give 95% of you lower taxes.
*And one, lone voice said, "But 40% of us don't pay ANY taxes!"
So the Pied Piper said, Then I'll give you some of the taxes the fat-cats pay!
*And the people said, "Show me the money!"
Then the Pied Piper said, I'll tax your Capital Gains when you sell your homes!
*And the people yawned and the slumping housing market collapsed.
And he said, I'll mandate employer- funded health care for EVERY worker and raise the minimum wage.
*And the people said, "Gimme some of that!"
Then he said, I'll penalize employers who ship jobs overseas.
*And the people said, "Where's my rebate check?"
Then the Pied Piper actually said, I'll bankrupt the coal industry and electricity rates will skyrocket!
*And the people said, "Coal is dirty, coal is evil, no more coal!
But we don't care for that part about higher electric rates."
So the Pied Piper said, Not to worry. If your rebate isn't enough to cover your expenses, we'll bail you out. Just sign up with ACORN and your troubles are over!
Then he said, illegal immigrants feel scorned and slighted.
Let's grant them amnesty, Social Security, free education, free lunches, free medical care, bi-lingual signs and guaranteed housing.
*And the people said, "Ole`! Bravo!" And they made him King!
And so it came to pass that employers, facing spiraling costs
and ever-higher taxes, raised their prices and laid off workers.
Others simply gave up and went out of business and the economy slowed even further.
Then the Pied Piper said, I am the Messiah and I'm here to save you!
We'll just print more money so everyone will have enough!
But our foreign trading partners said, Wait a minute. Your dollar

isn't worth what it was. You'll have to pay more.

*And the people said, "Wait a minute. That's not fair!"

And the world said, Neither are these other, idiotic programs

you've embraced.

You've become a Socialist state and a second-rate

power.

Now you'll play by our rules!

*And the people said, "What have we done?"

But it was too late.

If you think this is a fairy tale, open your eyes and ears.
It is happening RIGHT NOW!   EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD ...Join me

---