![]() | Mobile Mode Oldies & OTR
Notable Web Sites
Quotes: American Values & Today in Early America
Read Visitors' Comments
Tweet'n Tweets
Videos
When Men Were Men
→ Listen to The Blaze
† Gov. Huckabee
Mark Levin
Michael Savage, Streaming &
Podcasts (iTunes)
Mark Steyn Opines
250+Conservatives
Libertarian † Chuck Baldwin + His Columns
† Historical Founding Culture and Faith: David Barton's & Rick Green's "WallBuilders Live" Podcasts & Articles
|
|
Search Harrold's blog
| Lest We Forget...September 11th, The Victims ... and our enemies.
→ (allies=friends, enemies=treason) ←
"It is a principle incorporated into the settled policy of America, that as peace is better than war, war is better than tribute." -- James Madison (letter to the [Muslim] Dey of Algiers, August 1816) Reference: Madison, III, page 17
|
| The 2016 Presidential Election begins in |
| Also see: o'quotes and o'related videos |
Friday, August 19, 2011
Sunday, January 02, 2011
o'death - Medicare regulations revive "death panels" of ObamaCare bill
December 28, 2010/Liberty Counsel --
Medicare released a new regulation that will pay physicians for discussing end-of-life treatment options with their patients. This provision was originally included in "ObamaCare," but Democrats removed it after a hailstorm of criticism arose regarding so-called "death panels" that would allegedly pressure elderly patients to forgo life-saving treatment.
The language comes from Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), the author of the original end-of-life proposal, whose state is 1 of only 2 that allow physician-assisted suicide. The New York Times reported an email from his office saying, "Thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it, but we will be keeping a close watch and may be calling on you if we need a rapid, targeted response. The longer this goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it."
The "voluntary advance care planning" language was hidden on page 238 of a nearly 700-page document, the implementation of which begins in four days on January 1, 2011. The regulation will cover "(1) [a]n individual's ability to prepare an advance directive in the case where an injury or illness causes the individual to be unable to make health care decisions. (2) Whether or not the physician is willing to follow the individual's wishes as expressed in an advance directive."
Liberty Counsel is challenging the ObamaCare law, which will now be heard by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Judge Norman Moon found that Liberty University and 2 individual plaintiffs had standing to assert their constitutional claims against the individual and employer mandates in the healthcare law and that their claims were ripe for consideration.
Read our News Release for more details.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
values - "Dates that Destroyed America" (Chuck Baldwin)
Sunday, March 21, 2010
December 23, 1913
Monday, March 01, 2010
o'scamcare - MoveOn.org eats its own

We're ready to fight back [Chicago Style thuggery] and hold them accountable. [bully, intimidate, threaten] Over the weekend, 93% of MoveOn members voted [ninety three percent who?] to withhold support [take time to consider the ramifications of scamcare & their constituents' concerns] from any Democrat who helps block an up-or-down vote [the "nuclear" option, ignore the will of the people] on a health care bill with a public option.
Nazi 'toon source: http://facta-non-verba.blogspot.com/2009/09/obamas-health-care-speech-before.html
At the same time, we need to be clear: the "opt-out" version of the public option has real problems [if it was legitimate, it would be "opt-in"]. The most conservative states [is conservative bad?, liberal states with high taxes already likely would opt-out as well] in the country would likely opt out, potentially leaving millions of uninsured folks [why don't they buy insurance, if they can afford it] without access to the affordable health care a public option would provide [make honest wage earners & real tax payers foot the bill for those who don't pay taxes or are illegal].
So while this compromise version [a Democrat euphamism for bait-and-switch tactics] of the public option could help get a bill through the Senate, we need to push hard through the rest of the legislative process to make sure the final bill has a robust public option [like the street con "3 card Monte", every one loses] that doesn't leave anyone out. Our progressive champions [o'bama loons, progressive liberals, slobbering socialists, the Marxists, or Communists] in the House [and in the WH & among o'czars and o'czarinas] are fighting hard for that and we'll support their efforts.
Thanks to the tireless efforts of MoveOn members [o'puppet masters] and the broader progressive [socialist, communist, marxist, free loader] movement, the public option now has a ton of momentum [like screaming fire in a crowded theater]. And we're really close [panic time] to having the votes we need in the Senate. But we need to make sure a few conservative [honest] Democrats don't doom health care reform.
...we can pressure Democrats to support an up-or-down vote? [nuclear option to override the consensus of puplic opinion]
authored by [without the bracketed comments] – Justin, Ilyse, Kat, Laura, and the rest of the [o'soros moveon.org] team
Saturday, February 13, 2010
o'ship-of-fools - 1st Year: "In his own words." (FoxNews.com Jan10) Is this what you voted for?
Buckfarack January 23, 2010 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_2eUGM6z9Y&feature=PlayList&p=A69DFAAC0A2CCC9F&index=0&playnext=1
| Part 1 of 7 | Part 2 of 7 |
| Part 3 of 7 | Part 4 of 7 |
| Part 5 of 7 | Part 6 of 7 |
| Part 7 of 7 | 'Fox News Reporting' examines his fast-track rise from the Illinois legislature to the White House and the promises of hope and change he made along the way. Obama has pushed for big change and has taken aim at the Bush presidency, but he's also continuing some policies he once attacked as mistakes. |
2010 - A 'Party of No' Could Get 'Yes' Votes in November
Government & Politicsarticle source: http://PatriotPost.us
image source: http://antzinpantz.com/kns/?m=20090810
A winning message for RepublicansIn a Super Bowl pre-game interview, Barack Obama announced that he wants to have a televised meeting with both Republicans and Democrats to discuss ideas about crafting health care legislation. Imagine that -- an open debate with both parties equally represented, hashing out plans and crafting a bill using the best ideas brought to the table. In 2008, Candidate Obama told us that was how health care reform would come to pass in his new bipartisan and transparent Washington. The reality has been far different, though entirely predictable to those who recognized him for what he is: a socialist.
Legislation was crafted not to reform health care, but to put it solely under government control. Deals were made behind closed doors, and yet, even with bulletproof majorities in both chambers, the Democrat Congress has not passed a health care bill.
Now Obama is pretending to play the role of peacemaker, but he views bipartisanship as Republicans submitting to his will. Indeed, he won't agree to scrap the existing legislation and start from scratch, even though the public has made its distaste for the bills quite clear.
House Minority Leader John Boehner has made dropping the current legislation a prerequisite for Republicans to come to the table. It is, after all, a waste of time to debate a bill that's essentially dead. Republicans want to cut costs while Democrats want a health insurance entitlement for all. Both sides want to prevent insurance companies from rejecting ill customers, but Democrats, beholden to trial lawyers, reject the common-sense cost-cutting idea of tort reform, among other free-market measures. Unfortunately, neither side is talking about the constitutional role of government.
Even if the meeting happens, both sides are so deeply entrenched that a compromise is rather unlikely. Besides, Obama may be trying to set a political trap of sorts for Republicans by wooing them to the table, offering them a bad deal, then once again accusing them of being "The Party of No," that mantra so often repeated by his accomplices in the Leftmedia.
Such a label wouldn't be bad, however, considering that the alternative means going along with a plan that would raise taxes, remove competition in the insurance industry, drive down the quality of health care in our country, and add hundreds of billions -- if not trillions -- of dollars to the national debt.
In fact, when combined with advocating fiscal responsibility and constitutional Rule of Law, "Just Say No to Socialism" sounds like a winning formula for Republicans come November. Of course, the GOP would have to awaken from its stupor first.
Sunday, January 10, 2010
values - More Independents Choosing ‘Conservative’ in Obama’s First Year, Survey Says

Uncle Sam (Wikipedia Commons)
In fact, the percentage of American Independents who identified as conservatives – 35 percent – increased at the fastest rate in 10 years between 2008 and 2009, the latter Obama’s first year in office.
“The rather abrupt three-point increase between 2008 and 2009 in the percentage of Americans calling themselves conservative is largely owing to an increase – from 30 percent to 35 percent – in the percentage of political independents adopting the label.
According to a compilation of all Gallup political identification surveys from 2009, 40 percent of Americans identified themselves as conservatives, more than the 36 percent who answered moderate and far more than the 21 percent who answered liberal.
“The increased conservatism that Gallup first identified among Americans last June persisted throughout the year, so that the final year-end political ideology figures confirm Gallup's initial reporting: conservatives (40 percent) outnumbered both moderates (36 percent) and liberals (21 percent) across the nation in 2009,” Gallup reported Thursday.
Democratic leaders explained their brand’s seemingly bad fortunes, saying that the 2009 figures merely reflected the public’s desire to see Obama’s health care agenda pass. Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine told CBS News that his party would experience a “tailwind” when the president’s signature initiative passes.
“I think the president is about to achieve a victory with the passage of a comprehensive health reform bill that has eluded every Democratic president since Harry Truman and that will create a real tailwind for the president and the party when that happens,” Kaine told CBS’s “The Early Show.”
“We're starting to see some positive signs,” he said. “We've got more work to do, but I think the passage of historic health care and continued improvement in the economy will surprise some people in November in terms of how Democrats do.”
However, Gallup also found that in a decade that began and ended with liberal presidents, more Americans called themselves conservative or moderate than liberal. From 2000-2009, no more than 22 percent of Americans considered themselves liberal, while both conservative and moderate Americans hovered between 35 and 45 percent, trading places as the largest political identity several times over that period.
In fact, liberals have never made up much more than 20 percent of the country, according to Gallup, over approximately the last 20 years. From 1992 to 2009, liberals never made up more than 22 percent (in 2007 and 2008) of the country.
In a finding that could play out well for Republicans’ mid-term election hopes, conservatism saw its largest single-year gain in support since 1992-1993, the year before Republicans – led by conservative candidates – took control of Congress.
Conservatism saw a three percentage-point gain in 1992-1993 (from 36 to 39 percent). Between 2008 and 2009, conservatism also grew by three points (37 to 40 percent).
The Republican Party continued to be dominated by conservatives, with 71 percent of Republicans calling themselves conservative, as opposed to 35 percent of Independents and only 21 percent of Democrats. Republicans have been becoming increasingly conservative since 2003, growing from 62 percent in 2002 to 71 percent in 2009.
Democrats, likewise, continued becoming more liberal. Thirty-eight percent of Democrats called themselves liberal in 2009, one point less than in 2008 but nine points higher than the 29 percent of liberal Democrats Gallup reported in 2000.
Democrats make up the largest group of self-identified liberals, far outweighing the 18 percent of Independents and only 4 percent of Republicans who choose the label.
Independents continued to flee the “liberal” moniker, according to Gallup, with 78 percent choosing either the conservative (35 percent) or moderate (43 percent) label.
Thursday, January 07, 2010
o'nocchio - America will see the negotiations. (transparent ...he sure is!)
President Obama Tells the world that Health Care negotiations will be Bipartisan, Transparent and televised.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
o'humor - o'bamacare 'toon: You ready for yours? TOP 10 REASONS OBAMACARE IS WRONG FOR AMERICA
Obamacare: One Pill, Two Pill, Red Pill, Blue Pill
Posted July 30th, 2009 in Ongoing Priorities at http://blog.heritage.org/2009/07/30/obamacare-one-pill-two-pill-red-pill-blue-pill/
1.Millions Will Lose Their Current Insurance. Period. End of Story: President Obama wants Americans to believe they can keep their insurance if they like, but research from the government, private research firms, and think tanks show this is not the case. Proposed economic incentives, plus a government-run health plan like the one proposed in the House bill, would cause 88.1 million people to see their current employer-sponsored health plan disappear.
2.Your Health Care Coverage Will Probably Change Anyway: Even if you kept your private insurance, eventually most remaining plans—whether employer plans or individual plans—would have to conform to new federal benefit standards. Moreover, the necessary plan “upgrades” will undoubtedly cost you more in premiums.
3.The Umpire Is Also the First Baseman: The main argument for a “public option” is that it would increase competition. However, if the federal government creates a health care plan that it controls and also sets the rules for the private plans, there is little doubt that Washington would put its private sector “competitors” out of business sooner or later.
4.The Fed Picks Your Treatment: President Obama said: “They’re going to have to give up paying for things that don’t make them healthier. … If there’s a blue pill and a red pill, and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half for the thing that’s going to make you well.” Does that sound like a government that will stay out of your health care decisions?5.Individual Mandate Means Less Liberty and More Taxes: Although he once opposed the idea, President Obama is now open to the imposition of an individual mandate that would require all Americans to have federally-approved health insurance. This unprecedented federal directive not only takes away your individual freedom but could cost you as well. Lawmakers are considering a penalty or tax for those who don’t buy government-approved health plans.
6.Higher Taxes Than Europe Hurt Small Businesses: A proposed surtax on the wealthy will actually hit hundreds of thousands of small business owners who are dealing with a recession. If it is enacted, America’s top earners and job creators will carry a larger overall tax burden than France, Italy, Germany, Japan, etc., with a total average tax rate greater than 52%. Is that the right recipe for jobs and wage growth?
7.Who Makes Medical Decisions? What is the right medical treatment? And should bureaucrats determine what Americans can or cannot have? While the House and Senate language is vague, amendments offered in House and Senate committees to block government rationing of care were routinely defeated. Cost or a federal health board could be the deciding factors. President Obama himself admitted this when he said, “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller,” when asked about an elderly woman who needed a pacemaker.
8.Taxpayer-Funded Abortions? Nineteen Democrats recently asked the President to not sign any bill that doesn’t explicitly exclude “abortion from the scope of any government-defined or subsidized health insurance plan” or any bill that allows a federal health board to “recommend abortion services be included under covered benefits or as part of a benefits package.” Currently, these exclusions do not exist.
9.It’s Not Paid For: The CBO says the current House plan would increase the deficit by $239 billion over 10 years. And that number will likely continue to rise over the long term. Similar entitlement bills in the past, including Medicare, have scored much lower than their actual eventual cost.
10.Rushing It, Not Reading It: We’ve been down this road before—with the failed stimulus package. Back then, we also heard that we were in a crisis and that we needed to pass a 1,000-plus-page bill in a few hours—without reading it—or we would have 8% unemployment. Well, we know what happened. Now, one Congressman has even said it’s pointless to read one of the reform bills without two days and two lawyers to make sense of it. Deception is the only reason to rush through a bill nobody truly understands.
For more information, please visit: http://fixhealthcarepolicy.com/
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
o'scamcare - Health care LIFE petitions delivered!
![]() related, America's Final Solution • LifeNews • harrolds.blogspot.com ...today's Holocaust: Casualties, one cross = 50,000 or less Many are unaware of Planned Parenthood founder Sanger's "Negro Project," "the eugenic plan to limit — or exterminate — the black race and others "unfit to reproduce." [..to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation [in camps] to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring." [..by force if necessary.] "..during 1933 in Sanger's The Birth Control Review (immediate predecessor to the Planned Parenthood Review) an article by Ernst Rudin (1874-1952) was published entitled, "Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need." Rudin was Adolph Hitler's director of genetic sterilization and a founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. (Various references in Grand Illusions) History documents that Sanger supported the Nazi Party philosophies." [ abortion murders by Tiller estimates (at appr'x $5000 per) 60,000 of which 10,000 were late term/full term = $30,000,000.00 "... my first and foremost task will be the annihilation of the Jews." (Adolf Hitler, 1922) "The first thing I'd do, as president, is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do." (Obama, 2007) "I could smell the babies burning." (Tiller's crematorium staff, 1993) Negroes schwarzen, Jews Juden, the unfit und unwanted...beware | ||||||||||||||||

Oldies
Harrolds.Blogspot.com
















Legislation Pending in Congress



