o'sophist - o'illegal is Race Pandering For Hispanic Votes

From: AmeriPAC at http://ameripac.org Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010

 

    http://harrolds.blogspot.com/2010/05/illegals-read-arizona-law-sb1070-hb2162.html

 

A     ALERT: Page 1 Section E. of the Arizona Immigration Law.

        A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, WITHOUT A WARRANT, MAY ARREST A PERSON IF THE OFFICER   HAS PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON HAS COMMITTED ANY PUBLIC OFFENSE THAT MAKES THE PERSON REMOVABLE FROM THE UNITED STATES.

    

       Support Arizona's Immigration Law NOW!
   Arizona Has Passed STRONG Law Against Illegal Immigration.  The Obama, Holder, Janet Napolitano and other lawyers and politicians in the White House respond and: Admit they have not read the 10 page Arizona Immigration Law , Threaten to sue the State of Arizona, Race pander for Hispanic Votes, falsely claim to Profile everyone with brown skin as an Illegal Mexican. These lawyers do not seem to understand Probable Cause. It is defined as - Reasonable cause; having more evidence for than against; a reasonable belief that a crime has or is being committed and is the basis for all lawful searches and arrests.

    For example, a police officer may claim there is probable cause for attempted theft when someone is found trespassing on private property late at night wearing a stocking mask, in order to justify stopping and searching the person for possession of criminal tools. Then ask for ID.

Being in the U.S illegally is already a crime and checking ID's is sensible?

OF COURSE it is -- but the federal government has FAILED in its duty to put a STOP to the illegal immigration INVASION at our southern border; so, the people of Arizona have "stepped up to the plate" and done it themselves!

Even though this is a law that EVERY STATE IN AMERICA SHOULD PASS, Arizona is coming under attack by the forces we've fought so many times before: the pro-illegal immigration lobby. Now Obama and angry politician's are terrorizing American Cities by weakening the authority of law enforcement to use probable cause to fight crime. American's seem to have probable cause to be concerned about the White House failing to protect American communities.

It's time to FIGHT BACK -- and we've got just the way to fight them!  Simply put, the new Arizona law will make it a crime under State law to be in the country illegally. It would also require local police officers to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal immigrants. Other provisions of the bill allow lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws, and make it illegal to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them. As Gov. Brewer said when signing the law, this "protects every Arizona citizen," and she said the state MUST act because the federal government has FAILED.

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation."

EXACTLY. Arizona alone spends $3 billion a year to educate, medicate and incarcerate illegal aliens. But, as has happened with every other State facing this invasion, the federal government has done NOTHING to stop the flow of illegals from the south.

Of course, the response from Barack Hussein Obama and his liberal cronies in Congress was exactly as expected: cries of "racism" and "profiling," instead of listening to the voices of the American people DEMANDING they enforce the laws that are already on the books. In fact, numerous polls show a HUGE majority of public support for this new law, and many polls conducted over the last few years show that 81% of Americans believe that "local and state police should help federal authorities enforce laws against illegal immigration" -- 81 percent!

But despite all of this, supporters of illegal immigration are trying to REVERSE Arizona's law, STOP Congress from enforcing existing laws, and PREVENT any other State from passing a law like Arizona's -- and that means WE have to take action NOW!

TELL EVERY SINGLE GOVERNOR AND MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO SUPPORT ARIZONA'S NEW LAW: SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

It's already started: supporters of illegal immigration are now busing protesters in to the Arizona capitol from as far away as Los Angeles. They have surrounded the capitol building, demanding their "rights" -- meaning, their "rights" to BREAK THE LAW by coming to this country ILLEGALLY!!!

Not only that -- they're going so far as to threaten to MURDER Americans with axes and shovels! Have you even HEARD that on the mainstream media news? Of course not -- but it's right there on YouTube for all the world to see!

WE MUST FIGHT BACK AGAINST THESE PROPONENTS OF BREAKING OUR LAWS AND THREATENING OUR CITIZENS!

So, we've set up our website to enable you to send "Blast Faxes" to every single U.S. Senator, every single U.S. Representative, and every single U.S. State Governor, ALL AT ONCE, demanding that they SUPPORT Arizona's new law against illegal immigration, and SUPPORT efforts for every single state to pass the same law!

For about what it would cost you in time and telephone charges, you can send Blast Faxes to Democrats, Republicans, Independents -- EVERYONE in Congress and EVERY Governor, DEMANDING that they supporting putting a STOP to illegal immigration!   Please, take action right away to DEMAND that Congress and Governors SUPPORT the new law against illegal immigration recently passed by Arizona, and to ENCOURAGE every single State to pass the same law!
 
It's time we stood up and said enough is enough!  VOTE in every state and every election by helping AmeriPAC send support where it is needed.

Please join us with your AmeriPAC donation TODAY. Thank you.  For more information, visit www.ameripac.org

Sincerely, Alan M. Gottlieb, Chairman, AmeriPAC www.AmeriPAC.org 

P.S. It's really VERY VERY SIMPLE: As state Rep. Russell Pearce of Mesa, AZ, stated, "Illegal is illegal. We'll have less crime. We'll have lower taxes. We'll have safer neighborhoods. We'll have shorter lines in the emergency rooms. We'll have smaller classrooms."

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT?  Arizona has an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants and is the state with the most illegal border crossings, with the harsh, remote desert serving as the gateway for thousands of Mexicans and Central Americans. And they have the RIGHT to pass laws enforcing existing laws against illegal immigration!

Politicians in at least five states are calling for their state legislatures to adopt immigration laws that mirror Arizona's new law -- let's make that ALL FIFTY STATES!  Send your faxes right away to make sure these elected officials get OUR message, and not the pro-illegal immigration message of bussed-in protestors -- Thank you

 

Please make checks payable to: American Political Action Committee (AmeriPAC) PO Box Paid for by AmeriPAC, a federally-authorized and qualified multicandidate political action committee. Contributions to AmeriPAC will be used in connection with federal elections. Maximum contribution per individual per calendar year is $5,000. Contributions from foreign nationals and corporations are prohibited. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes.

---

illegals - You old white people. It is your duty to die.

From: baja Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010


http://www.ccir.net HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT!


Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston!  Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims!  Get out!  We are the future.  You are old and tired.  Go on.  We have beaten you.  Leave like beaten rats.  You old white people.  It is your duty to die . . Through love of having children, we are going to take over.

Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions.  They're right.  We will take them over . . . We are here to stay."

Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."

Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America.  They are not making babies.  They are dying.  The explosion is in our population . . . I love it.  They are shitting in their pants with fear.  I love it."

Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."

Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."

Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state.  Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."

Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "

Are these just the words of a few extremists?  Consider that we could fill up many pages with such quotes.  Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders.

THE  U.S.  VS  MEXICO:
On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum.  The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country.  They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down.  As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon.  Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match.  The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."

Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts?  It's called affirmative action or racial privilege.  The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent.  Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice.  It was defeated.  Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants.  They were joined by thirteen Republicans.  Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good.  They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.

Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and third world immigrants should get special, privileged status.  Some examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks and many more.

Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the defense in criminal cases involving Mexican nationals?  Did you know that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so?  According to the L.A. Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs with 17,000 members; 98% of which are Mexican and Asian.  How's your county doing?

According to a New York Times article dated May 19, 1994, 20 years after the great influx of legal immigrants from Southeast Asia, 30% are still on welfare compared to 8% of households nationwide.  A Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes law enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the "greatest criminal challenge the country faces."  Not bad for a group that is still under 5% of the population.

Is education important to you?  Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system.  "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in English.  Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural references."

When I was young, I remember hearing about the immigrants that came through Ellis Island.  They wanted to learn English.  They wanted to breath free.  They wanted to become Americans.  Now too many immigrants come here with demands.  They demand to be taught in their own language.  They demand special privileges--affirmative action.  They demand ethnic studies that glorify their culture.

HOW CAN YOU HELP?  Send copies of this letter to at least two other people, 100 would be even better.  Help us get the word out.   California Coalition for Immigration Reform, 5942 Edinger, Suite 113-117, Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Phone 714.921.7142

---

Obama's Anti-Gun Agenda Heads To Supreme Court

From: ConservativeActionAlerts  Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009

Chicago Gun Ban Case to Determine Gun Rights For All States

The U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will hear the case of McDonald v. City of Chicago, and decide whether the right to keep and bear arms secured by the Second Amendment protects Americans from overreaching state and local governments.

The Supreme Court case is of paramount importance to American citizens, to see that their constitutional rights are respected not only by the Congress, but by state and local governments.

Obama made public his clear anti-gun agenda in March 2004 in Chicago. Obama voted against Illinois Senate Bill 2165 allowing citizens the right to protect themselves and for local ordinances against handgun possession. The measure passed the Illinois Senate by a vote of 38-20 without Obama's vote. STOP Obama's Anti-Gun Agenda now before he can appoint any anti-gun judges.

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) is delighted to bring this case in cooperation with the Illinois State Rifle Association and the four local plaintiffs. We are in this fight because a gun ban is no less onerous to civil rights in Chicago than it was in the District of Columbia. Such a law cannot be allowed to stand unchallenged.

Protecting our gun rights is expensive and it's impossible to put a price tag on. This time freedom will cost $250,000 to defend your Second Amendment rights in this challenge to the Chicago gun ban. SAF stands firmly committed to defend these rights and we are asking you to stand with us and we need your help to stop the anti-freedom extremists now!

We urgently need you to demand that all State Attorneys General file an Amicus Brief stating they agree that the individual right to keep and bear arms is protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and applies to all 50 states.

At issue is a 27-year-old Chicago law banning handguns, requiring the annual taxation of firearms, and otherwise interfering with the right of law-abiding individuals to keep guns at home for self-defense. The case was brought on behalf of four Chicago residents, the Second Amendment Foundation, and the Illinois State Rifle Association.

Last year, in the landmark case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms. However, as that case concerned the actions of the District of Columbia government, a federal entity, the high court was not called upon to decide whether the right bound states and local governments. Over the years, almost the entire Bill of Rights has been held to apply to state and local governments by incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

"The freedoms we enjoy as Americans are secured to us against violation by all levels of government," noted Alan Gura, of Gura & Possessky, PLLC, lead counsel for the McDonald plaintiffs. "State and local politicians should be on notice: the Second Amendment is a normal part of the Bill of Rights, and it is coming to your town."

Otis McDonald, a Chicago resident since 1952 who led the fight to integrate his union local in the 1960s and is a plaintiff in the case, welcomed the news.

"I am grateful the Supreme Court has agreed to hear this case," McDonald said. "I now pray that the Court secures me and all other law-abiding citizens the right to defend ourselves and our families."

Chicago attorney David Sigale commented, "The City of Chicago cannot take from millions of Americans the fundamental freedom of self-defense in one's own home. We are confident the Court will stand on the side of the law-abiding citizens and the Bill of Rights."

"We're pleased to hear that the Supreme Court has decided to take a look at Chicago's gun laws," added ISRA President Don Moran. "In this time of economic uncertainty and increasing lawlessness, the good people of Chicago ought not have to choose between violating Chicago's gun ban, and protecting themselves and their loved ones."

The Chicago gun ban challenge will likely be among the most closely watched constitutional law cases in decades. At stake is not just the question of whether the Second Amendment secures the right to arms against state and local governments, but also the extent to which the Supreme Court preserves individual liberty against encroachment by state and local governments.

Oral argument will possibly be scheduled early this coming winter, with a decision expected by June 2010. Gura will argue the case on behalf of the McDonald plaintiffs.

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

DO NOT BE SILENCED - MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!

For our projects to be successful, we must count on the voluntary financial support from individuals like you who care.

As I write this, the anti-freedom extremists are raising tens of thousands of dollars to defeat us at the Supreme Court - maybe even more! We need your financial support today to ensure we have the resources to beat back anti-gunners who will stop at nothing to take away our right and ability to defend ourselves and our families.

Please give your most generous contribution today. Help me defend your individual right to bear arms in this important Supreme Court case, today!  Your contribution of $20 or $25 is urgently needed today. Your donation for just $10 will help so much. If you can afford to send $50 or $100 or more it would truly be a godsend. Remember, protecting our freedom is not inexpensive. But then, it's impossible to put a price tag on freedom. FAX All 50 State Attorney Generals Now and Donate The $250,000 NeededFor SAF To Defend Second Amendment Rights At The Supreme Court! https://secure.responseenterprises.com/saf_faxag/?a=3069

Together, we can preserve the Constitutional rights our Founding Fathers intended our people to have forever.

For more information about SAF go to http://www.saf.org   Thank you. I know I can count on you.

Sincerely yours,Alan M. Gottlieb, Founder, Second Amendment Foundation

Send Checks To:
Second Amendment Foundation, James Madison Building, Dept Code 3069, 12500 NE 10th Place, Bellevue, WA 98005

Paid for by Second Amendment Foundation 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Contributions are tax deducible.Copyright � 2009 Second Amendment Foundation, All Rights Reserved.

---